Skip to content
Surf Wiki
Save to docs
politics

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

1950 Belgian monarchy referendum

Referendum on the return of King Leopold to the throne of Belgium

1950 Belgian monarchy referendum

Referendum on the return of King Leopold to the throne of Belgium

FieldValue
titleAre you of the opinion that King Leopold III should resume the exercise of his constitutional powers?
countryBelgium
date12 March 1950
yes2,933,382
no2,151,881
invalid151,477
electorate5,635,452
mapKoningskwestie kaart met percentage voor-stemmen.png
map_captionResults by arrondissement

A referendum on allowing King Leopold III's return to Belgium, and restoration of his powers and duties as monarch was held in Belgium on 12 March 1950. The proposal was approved by 58% of voters.

Background

Main article: Royal Question

King Leopold went into exile in June 1944, when Heinrich Himmler ordered him to leave Belgium. Leopold was held by the Nazis in Strobl, Austria until early May 1945, when he was freed by members of the United States 106th Cavalry Group. Because of the political troubles surrounding his wartime behaviour, King Leopold remained in exile in Switzerland until 1950, his brother Prince Charles, Count of Flanders having been installed as Regent after the Liberation in 1944.

The Catholics, who generally supported the King's return, won a majority in the Belgian Senate during the general election of 26 June 1949. The Catholics formed a government with the Liberals. The date of the referendum () the King wanted was set by this government for 12 March 1950.

Socialist Leader Paul-Henri Spaak opposed holding a referendum. He foresaw that the vote for Leopold might fall between 55% and 65%, giving no decisive mandate for the king's return, and that the King would carry Flanders and lose Wallonia. In that case, said Spaak, "the government would not only have on its hands the King's abdication or return, it would also have to appease the anger, acerbity and rancor of Flanders or Wallonia."

Results

Belgian monarchy consultation 1950 results by province
Results by region.

]]

The question voters were asked was: :Dutch: "Zijt U de mening toegedaan dat Koning Leopold III de uitoefening van zijn grondwettelijke machten zou hernemen?" :French: "Êtes-vous d'avis que le Roi Leopold III reprenne l'exercice de ses pouvoirs constitutionnels ?" :Translation: "Are you of the opinion that King Leopold III should resume the exercise of his constitutional powers?"

A majority voted in favour of Leopold's return. In Flanders 72% voted in favour while in Wallonia 58% voted against. In Brussels, 52% voted against.

By arrondissement

ArrondissementProvinceTotal
votesInvalid/
blankForAgainstVotes%Votes%
AntwerpenAntwerp484,93612,236297,863**63.0**174,83737.0
MechelenAntwerp156,0993,905106,450**69.9**45,74430.1
TurnhoutAntwerp134,6843,678110,576**84.4**20,43015.6
BrusselsBrabant832,08726,773387,91448.2417,400**51.8**
LeuvenBrabant197,5407,530125,944**66.3**64,06633.7
NivellesBrabant119,6863,09743,77737.572,812**62.5**
BruggeWest Flanders119,5733,67783,623**72.2**32,27327.8
Veurne-Diksmuide-OostendeWest Flanders118,2654,61582,652**72.7**30,99827.3
Roeselare-TieltWest Flanders116,9453,37296,196**84.7**17,37715.3
KortrijkWest Flanders167,7725,163114,198**70.2**48,41129.8
YpresWest Flanders74,1013,01154,109**76.1**16,98123.9
Gent-EekloEast Flanders328,2989,792224,874**70.6**93,63229.4
Sint-NiklaasEast Flanders111,0481,83384,955**77.8**24,26022.2
DendermondeEast Flanders97,7562,15072,223**75.5**23,38324.5
AalstEast Flanders145,9942,924100,130**70.0**42,94030.0
OudenaardeEast Flanders73,5002,37147,607**66.9**23,52233.1
MonsHainaut162,2504,46749,24331.2108,540**68.8**
SoigniesHainaut103,9522,56534,87534.466,512**65.6**
CharleroiHainaut268,3757,20986,00332.9175,163**67.1**
ThuinHainaut82,5402,29434,52943.045,717**57.0**
Tournai-AthHainaut147,9924,05662,66143.581,275**56.5**
LiègeLiège353,59810,095119,16134.7224,342**65.3**
Huy-WaremmeLiège109,2863,13244,44541.961,709**58.1**
VerviersLiège141,2534,99881,238**59.6**55,01740.4
HasseltLimburg109,4723,51387,241**82.3**18,71817.7
Tongeren-MaaseikLimburg124,3333,616101,783**84.3**18,93415.7
Arlon-Marche-BastogneLuxembourg72,5262,07846,296**65.7**24,15234.3
Neufchâteau-VirtonLuxembourg59,2231,59537,443**65.0**20,18535.0
NamurNamur135,6003,49564,11248.567,993**51.5**
Dinant-PhilippevilleNamur88,0562,23751,261**59.7**34,55840.3
Flanders (four Flemish provinces plus Leuven)2,560,31673,3861,790,424**71.0**696,50628.0
Wallonia (four Walloon provinces plus Nivelles)1,844,33751,318755,04442.11,037,975**57.9**
**Total**5,236,740151,4772,933,382**57.7**2,151,88142.3
Source: Theunissen, Alexandre, Senate

Aftermath

Main article: Royal Question#Return of Leopold

Notes

References

References

  1. (12 March 1950). "Belgium, 12 March 1950: Return of King Leopold III".
  2. (20 March 1950). "Belgium up in the air".
  3. "Niveau de perception : Belgique".
  4. (12 March 1950). "Belgien, 12. März 1950 : Rückkehr König Leopolds III -- [in German]".
  5. Paul Theunissen. (1984). "1950, Ontknoping van de koningskwestie". De Nederlandsche boekhandel, Anvers.
  6. Jean Alexandre. (15 April 1950). "Géographie politique de la Belgique: Résultats de la consultation populaire du 12 Mars 1950". La Revue Nouvelle.
  7. (13 March 1950). "Communication of the Minister of the Interior on the referendum".
Info: Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about 1950 Belgian monarchy referendum — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report