From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
1935 Quebec general election
Canadian provincial election
Canadian provincial election
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| election_name | 1935 Quebec general election |
| country | Quebec |
| type | parliamentary |
| ongoing | no |
| party_colour | no |
| party_name | no |
| previous_election | 1931 Quebec general election |
| previous_year | 1931 |
| previous_mps | 18th Quebec Legislature |
| next_election | 1936 Quebec general election |
| next_year | 1936 |
| elected_members | 19th Quebec Legislature |
| seats_for_election | 89 seats in the [19th Legislative Assembly of Quebec](19th-legislative-assembly-of-quebec) |
| 45 seats were needed for a majority | |
| election_date | November 25, 1935 |
| image1 | File:Louis-Alexandre Taschereau - 1930.png |
| image1_size | 150x150px |
| colour1 | |
| leader1 | Louis-Alexandre Taschereau |
| leader_since1 | 1920 |
| party1 | |
| leaders_seat1 | Montmorency |
| last_election1 | 79 seats, 54.88% |
| seats1 | **47** |
| seat_change1 | 32 |
| percentage1 | **46.53%** |
| swing1 | 8.35pp |
| image2 | Paul Gouin 1945.jpg |
| image2_size | 150x150px |
| colour2 | |
| leader2 | Paul Gouin |
| leader_since2 | 1934 |
| party2 | Action libérale nationale |
| leaders_seat2 | L'Assomption |
| last_election2 | *pre-creation* |
| seats2 | 25 |
| seat_change2 | 25 |
| percentage2 | 29.48% |
| swing2 | 29.48pp |
| image3 | Maurice Duplessis, 1938.png |
| image3_size | 150x150px |
| colour3 | |
| leader3 | Maurice Duplessis |
| leader_since3 | 1933 |
| party3 | |
| leaders_seat3 | Trois-Rivières |
| last_election3 | 11 seats, 43.54% |
| seats3 | 17 |
| seat_change3 | 6 |
| percentage3 | 18.93% |
| swing3 | 24.61pp |
| title | Premier |
| before_election | Louis-Alexandre Taschereau |
| before_party | |
| after_election | Louis-Alexandre Taschereau |
| posttitle | Premier after election |
| after_party |
45 seats were needed for a majority
The 1935 Quebec general election was held on November 25, 1935, to elect members of the Legislative Assembly of the province of Quebec, Canada. The incumbent Quebec Liberal Party led by Louis-Alexandre Taschereau was re-elected, defeating the Action libérale nationale, led by Paul Gouin, and the Quebec Conservative Party, led by Maurice Duplessis.
It was the fourth and final general election victory in a row for Taschereau, who had held office since 1920. He resigned less than seven months later due to a scandal.
The Action libérale nationale (ALN) was a newly formed party led by the son of former Liberal premier Lomer Gouin. It was established by former Liberals who had become dissatisfied with the party. The ALN and Conservatives formed an alliance, the Union Nationale, to contest this election. They merged after the election to become a single party, which soon became a dominant political force.
Campaign


Nominations
There were 208 candidates nominated, of which five subsequently withdrew:
:* Wilfrid Bullock (Ind-Liberal, Shefford) :* Wilfrid Labelle (ALN, Iberville), thus allowing Lucien Lamoureux (Liberal) to be reelected by acclamation :* Roy Sasseville and René Mercier (Ind-Liberals, Gaspé-Nord) :* Arthur Arcand (Ind-Liberal, Montréal–Sainte-Marie), in favour of Gaspard Fauteux (Liberal)
All three candidates returned by acclamation were incumbents:
:* Lucien Lamoureux (Lib, Iberville) :* Peter Bercovitch (Lib, Montréal–Saint-Louis) :* Avila Turcotte (Lib, Richelieu)
Distribution of candidates
| Candidates | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| align="center" | **Lib** | align="center" | **Ind-G** |
| Acclaimed | 3 | ||
| 2 | 64 | ||
| 3 | 19 | ||
| 4 | 4 | ||
| Total | 90 |
Controversy in Terrebonne
In Terrebonne, the election of Athanase David was contested on the ground that the ballot papers were not printed in the form prescribed under the Election Act. At the subsequent hearing, the judge ruled that all cast ballots were declared void. Immediately afterwards, the returning officer announced that, as this resulted in a 0–0 tie, he cast his deciding vote in favour of David.
| Candidate | Initial | |
|---|---|---|
| count | As determined by | |
| Returning Officer | ||
| Athanase David | 4,893 | 1 |
| **Majority** | 720 | 1 |
The returning officer's action was considered to have been without precedent anywhere in the world in countries with parliamentary-style legislatures. The Conservatives lodged an appeal, but the result was upheld by the Quebec Court of Appeal in April 1936. David would become the only member of the Assembly in Quebec history to be elected on only one cast vote.
Results
|-
! colspan=2 rowspan=2 | Political party
! rowspan=2 | Party leader
! colspan=4 | MLAs
! colspan=4 | Votes
|-
! Candidates
!1935
!±
!#
! ±
!%
! ± (pp)
| - |
|---|
| 90 |
| 79 |
| 47 |
| 5 |
| 249,586 |
| 19,146 |
| 46.53 |
| 8.35 |
| - |
| 3 |
| – |
| – |
| – |
| 615 |
| 2,172 |
| 0.11 |
| 0.46 |
| - |
| - |
| 53 |
| – |
| 26 |
| 26 |
| 162,205 |
| |30.24 | |- |33 |11 |16 |5 |97,469 |115,754 |18.17
| 25.37 |
|---|
| - |
| 1 |
| – |
| – |
| – |
| 1,532 |
| |0.29 | |- |1 |– |– |– |94 |12 |0.02
| – |
|---|
| - |
| 19 |
| – |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| 21,587 |
| 20,522 |
| 4.02 |
| 3.80 |
| - |
| 2 |
| – |
| – |
| – |
| 2,238 |
| 1,757 |
| 0.42 |
| 0.32 |
| - |
| 1 |
| – |
| – |
| – |
| 998 |
| |0.19 | |- |1 |– |– |– |37 |547 |–
| 0.12 |
|---|
| ! colspan="3" style="text-align:left;" |
| 204 |
| ! " colspan="3" |
| ! " colspan="2" |
| ! " colspan="2" |
| - |
| 15,232 |
| 11,042 |
| - |
| 551,593 |
| 57,708 |
| 76.16 |
| 0.85 |
| - |
| 724,260 |
| 82,936 |
| - |
| 3 |
| 3 |
| } |
Synopsis of results
| Riding | Winning party | Turnout | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| including spoilt ballots | VotesAffiliations without candidates gaining 1st or 2nd place results provincewide, or otherwise not receiving more than 1% of the total vote, are grouped under "I-Oth" or "Other" | Name | **[1931](1931-quebec-general-election)** | Party | Votes | Share | Margin | ||||||||||||
| # | Margin | ||||||||||||||||||
| % | Lib | ALN | Con | I-Lib | Lib-O | Lab | Other | Total | |||||||||||
| Abitibi | Lib | Lib | 6,088 | 55.78% | 1,261 | 11.55% | 80.85% | 6,088 | – | 4,827 | – | – | – | – | 10,915 | ||||
| Argenteuil | Lib | Lib | 2,412 | 51.31% | 123 | 2.62% | 77.61% | 2,412 | 2,289 | – | – | – | – | – | 4,701 | ||||
| Arthabaska | Lib | Lib | 4,143 | 69.36% | 2,313 | 38.72% | 84.12% | 4,143 | – | 1,830 | – | – | – | – | 5,973 | ||||
| Bagot | Lib | Lib | 2,386 | 57.98% | 657 | 15.97% | 89.06% | 2,386 | 1,729 | – | – | – | – | – | 4,115 | ||||
| Beauce | Lib | ALN | 6,862 | 80.41% | 5,190 | 60.82% | 83.45% | 1,672 | 6,862 | – | – | – | – | – | 8,534 | ||||
| Beauharnois | Lib | Con | 2,706 | 53.38% | 343 | 6.77% | 82.16% | 2,363 | – | 2,706 | – | – | – | – | 5,069 | ||||
| Bellechasse | Lib | Lib | 2,483 | 54.08% | 375 | 8.17% | 83.22% | 2,483 | 2,108 | – | – | – | – | – | 4,591 | ||||
| Berthier | Lib | Lib | 2,897 | 58.77% | 865 | 17.55% | 91.58% | 2,897 | 2,032 | – | – | – | – | – | 4,929 | ||||
| Bonaventure | Lib | Lib | 4,507 | 62.56% | 1,810 | 25.12% | 81.86% | 4,507 | 2,697 | – | – | – | – | – | 7,204 | ||||
| Brome | Lib | Lib | 1,999 | 57.28% | 508 | 14.56% | 82.19% | 1,999 | – | 1,491 | – | – | – | – | 3,490 | ||||
| Chambly | Con | Lib | 3,023 | 54.95% | 545 | 9.91% | 71.87% | 3,023 | – | 2,478 | – | – | – | – | 5,501 | ||||
| Champlain | Lib | ALN | 3,257 | 56.20% | 719 | 12.41% | 76.09% | 2,538 | 3,257 | – | – | – | – | – | 5,795 | ||||
| Charlevoix—Saguenay | Lib | Lib | 5,220 | 65.57% | 2,479 | 31.14% | 76.76% | 5,220 | 2,741 | – | – | – | – | – | 7,961 | ||||
| Châteauguay | Lib | Lib | 1,967 | 58.04% | 545 | 16.08% | 86.26% | 1,967 | 1,422 | – | – | – | – | – | 3,389 | ||||
| Chicoutimi | Lib | ALN | 7,484 | 72.60% | 4,659 | 45.19% | 76.25% | 2,825 | 7,484 | – | – | – | – | – | 10,309 | ||||
| Compton | Lib | Con | 2,803 | 52.27% | 243 | 4.53% | 83.19% | 2,560 | – | 2,803 | – | – | – | – | 5,363 | ||||
| Deux-Montagnes | Con | Lib | 1,848 | 50.19% | 14 | 0.38% | 92.53% | 1,848 | – | 1,834 | – | – | – | – | 3,682 | ||||
| Dorchester | Lib | ALN | 3,661 | 55.94% | 777 | 11.87% | 84.37% | 2,884 | 3,661 | – | – | – | – | – | 6,545 | ||||
| Drummond | Lib | Lib | 3,245 | 47.57% | 20 | 0.29% | 79.71% | 3,245 | – | 3,225 | 351 | – | – | – | 6,821 | ||||
| Frontenac | Lib | ALN | 3,310 | 62.19% | 1,298 | 24.39% | 84.57% | 2,012 | 3,310 | – | – | – | – | – | 5,322 | ||||
| Gaspé-Nord | Lib | Lib | 1,228 | 44.27% | 96 | 3.46% | 83.41% | 1,228 | 414 | – | 1,132 | – | – | – | 2,774 | ||||
| Gaspé-Sud | Lib | Lib | 3,019 | 50.42% | 1,281 | 21.39% | 86.10% | 3,019 | – | 660 | 2,309 | – | – | – | 5,988 | ||||
| Gatineau | Lib | Lib | 2,793 | 57.95% | 766 | 15.89% | 63.66% | 2,793 | 2,027 | – | – | – | – | – | 4,820 | ||||
| Hull | Con | Lib | 3,053 | 48.93% | 795 | 12.74% | 59.29% | 3,053 | – | 2,258 | 928 | – | – | – | 6,239 | ||||
| Huntingdon | Con | Con | 1,750 | 54.79% | 306 | 9.58% | 83.59% | 1,444 | – | 1,750 | – | – | – | – | 3,194 | ||||
| Iberville | Lib | Lib | *acclaimed (opponent withdrew)* | ||||||||||||||||
| Îles-de-la-Madeleine | Lib | Lib | 1,358 | 67.29% | 963 | 47.72% | 87.20% | 1,358 | 395 | – | 265 | – | – | – | 2,018 | ||||
| Jacques-Cartier | Lib | ALN | 4,909 | 56.84% | 1,182 | 13.69% | 73.16% | 3,727 | 4,909 | – | – | – | – | – | 8,636 | ||||
| Joliette | Lib | Lib | 3,484 | 53.32% | 434 | 6.64% | 86.80% | 3,484 | – | 3,050 | – | – | – | – | 6,534 | ||||
| Kamouraska | Lib | Lib | 2,918 | 57.27% | 741 | 14.54% | 83.99% | 2,918 | 2,177 | – | – | – | – | – | 5,095 | ||||
| L'Assomption | Lib | ALN | 1,969 | 50.80% | 62 | 1.60% | 89.29% | 1,907 | 1,969 | – | – | – | – | – | 3,876 | ||||
| L'Islet | Lib | Lib | 2,454 | 59.32% | 771 | 18.64% | 81.33% | 2,454 | 1,683 | – | – | – | – | – | 4,137 | ||||
| Labelle | Lib | ALN | 2,604 | 62.93% | 1,070 | 25.86% | 80.81% | 1,534 | 2,604 | – | – | – | – | – | 4,138 | ||||
| Lac-Saint-Jean | Lib | Con | 2,255 | 50.59% | 53 | 1.19% | 86.90% | 2,202 | – | 2,255 | – | – | – | – | 4,457 | ||||
| Laval | Lib | Con | 10,125 | 53.62% | 2,412 | 12.77% | 69.50% | 7,713 | – | 10,125 | 1,044 | – | – | – | 18,882 | ||||
| Laviolette | Lib | ALN | 3,497 | 61.00% | 1,261 | 22.00% | 72.64% | 2,236 | 3,497 | – | – | – | – | – | 5,733 | ||||
| Lévis | Lib | ALN | 3,346 | 42.33% | 595 | 7.53% | 86.19% | 1,808 | 3,346 | – | 2,751 | – | – | – | 7,905 | ||||
| Lotbinière | Lib | Lib | 4,088 | 80.58% | 3,103 | 61.17% | 77.67% | 4,088 | 985 | – | – | – | – | – | 5,073 | ||||
| Maisonneuve | Lib | Con | 9,408 | 56.34% | 2,757 | 16.51% | 65.26% | 6,651 | – | 9,408 | – | – | 639 | – | 16,698 | ||||
| Maskinongé | Lib | Lib | 2,319 | 64.20% | 1,026 | 28.41% | 78.04% | 2,319 | 1,293 | – | – | – | – | – | 3,612 | ||||
| Matane | Lib | Lib | 2,780 | 57.53% | 728 | 15.07% | 72.12% | 2,780 | 2,052 | – | – | – | – | – | 4,832 | ||||
| Matapédia | Lib | Lib | 2,809 | 50.86% | 95 | 1.72% | 86.71% | 2,809 | 2,714 | – | – | – | – | – | 5,523 | ||||
| Mégantic | Lib | ALN | 4,480 | 59.06% | 1,375 | 18.13% | 84.61% | 3,105 | 4,480 | – | – | – | – | – | 7,585 | ||||
| Missisquoi | Lib | Con | 2,686 | 53.23% | 481 | 9.53% | 83.64% | 2,205 | – | 2,686 | – | – | – | 155 | 5,046 | ||||
| Montcalm | Lib | Lib | 1,763 | 52.77% | 185 | 5.54% | 85.17% | 1,763 | – | 1,578 | – | – | – | – | 3,341 | ||||
| Montmagny | Lib | ALN | 2,340 | 52.51% | 224 | 5.03% | 83.87% | 2,116 | 2,340 | – | – | – | – | – | 4,456 | ||||
| Montmorency | Lib | Lib | 2,196 | 56.26% | 489 | 12.53% | 90.42% | 2,196 | 1,707 | – | – | – | – | – | 3,903 | ||||
| Montréal-Dorion | Lib | ALN | 4,979 | 56.17% | 1,094 | 12.34% | 66.99% | 3,885 | 4,979 | – | – | – | – | – | 8,864 | ||||
| Montréal-Laurier | Lib | ALN | 2,471 | 35.00% | 872 | 12.35% | 60.15% | 1,594 | 2,471 | – | 1,397 | – | 1,599 | – | 7,061 | ||||
| Montréal-Mercier | Lib | Lib | 9,071 | 50.05% | 776 | 4.28% | 71.30% | 9,071 | 8,295 | – | 757 | – | – | – | 18,123 | ||||
| Montréal–Saint-Georges | Con | Con | 1,414 | 55.54% | 282 | 11.08% | 49.90% | 1,132 | – | 1,414 | – | – | – | – | 2,546 | ||||
| Montréal–Saint-Henri | Lib | ALN | 2,418 | 35.03% | 128 | 1.85% | 67.09% | 2,290 | 2,418 | – | 2,194 | – | – | – | 6,902 | ||||
| Montreal–Saint-Jacques | Lib | Con | 3,036 | 50.38% | 46 | 0.76% | 72.49% | 2,990 | – | 3,036 | – | – | – | – | 6,026 | ||||
| Montréal–Saint-Laurent | Lib | Lib | 3,351 | 76.72% | 2,334 | 53.43% | 94.25% | 3,351 | – | 1,017 | – | – | – | – | 4,368 | ||||
| Montréal–Saint-Louis | Lib | Lib | *acclaimed (receiving officer not available to receive opponent's nomination papers)* | ||||||||||||||||
| Montreal–Sainte-Anne | Lib | I-Lib | 1,541 | 46.25% | 550 | 16.51% | 65.12% | 991 | 716 | – | 1,541 | – | – | 84 | 3,332 | ||||
| Montréal–Sainte-Marie | Lib | ALN | 4,782 | 49.92% | 361 | 3.77% | 66.11% | 4,421 | 4,782 | – | – | – | – | 376 | 9,579 | ||||
| Montréal-Verdun | Con | Con | 6,518 | 49.06% | 3,017 | 22.71% | 58.53% | 3,501 | – | 6,518 | 3,268 | – | – | – | 13,287 | ||||
| Napierville-Laprairie | Lib | Lib | 2,641 | 58.74% | 1,158 | 25.76% | 88.68% | 2,641 | 1,483 | – | 372 | – | – | – | 4,496 | ||||
| Nicolet | Lib | Lib | 3,427 | 54.41% | 556 | 8.83% | 79.82% | 3,427 | – | 2,871 | – | – | – | – | 6,298 | ||||
| Papineau | Lib | ALN | 4,075 | 56.72% | 966 | 13.45% | 73.11% | 3,109 | 4,075 | – | – | – | – | – | 7,184 | ||||
| Pontiac | Lib | Lib | 1,779 | 44.31% | 62 | 1.54% | 67.79% | 1,779 | 1,717 | – | 519 | – | – | – | 4,015 | ||||
| Portneuf | Lib | ALN | 4,502 | 56.32% | 1,047 | 13.10% | 84.49% | 3,455 | 4,502 | – | – | – | – | 37 | 7,994 | ||||
| Québec-Centre | Lib | ALN | 3,824 | 52.74% | 398 | 5.49% | 80.81% | 3,426 | 3,824 | – | – | – | – | – | 7,250 | ||||
| Québec-Comté | Lib | Lib | 3,987 | 48.07% | 234 | 2.82% | 91.36% | 3,987 | 3,753 | – | 554 | – | – | – | 8,294 | ||||
| Québec-Est | Lib | ALN | 5,629 | 57.61% | 1,487 | 15.22% | 84.13% | 4,142 | 5,629 | – | – | – | – | – | 9,771 | ||||
| Québec-Ouest | Lib | Lib | 1,894 | 58.44% | 547 | 16.88% | 81.71% | 1,894 | – | 1,347 | – | – | – | – | 3,241 | ||||
| Richelieu | Lib | Lib | *acclaimed (opponent withdrew)* | ||||||||||||||||
| Richmond | Lib | Con | 3,170 | 55.58% | 637 | 11.17% | 83.23% | 2,533 | – | 3,170 | – | – | – | – | 5,703 | ||||
| Rimouski | Lib | Lib | 3,055 | 53.49% | 399 | 6.99% | 79.54% | 3,055 | 2,656 | – | – | – | – | – | 5,711 | ||||
| Rivière-du-Loup | Lib | Lib | 3,866 | 59.26% | 1,208 | 18.52% | 84.53% | 3,866 | 2,658 | – | – | – | – | – | 6,524 | ||||
| Roberval | Lib | ALN | 3,768 | 60.56% | 1,611 | 25.89% | 81.59% | 2,157 | 3,768 | – | 297 | – | – | – | 6,222 | ||||
| Rouville | Con | Con | 1,938 | 53.08% | 225 | 6.16% | 87.16% | 1,713 | – | 1,938 | – | – | – | – | 3,651 | ||||
| Saint-Hyacinthe | Lib | Lib | 3,381 | 53.68% | 463 | 7.35% | 86.13% | 3,381 | 2,918 | – | – | – | – | – | 6,299 | ||||
| Saint-Jean | Lib | Lib | 2,626 | 63.16% | 1,094 | 26.31% | 79.55% | 2,626 | – | – | – | 1,532 | – | – | 4,158 | ||||
| Saint-Maurice | Lib | ALN | 4,219 | 59.72% | 1,373 | 19.43% | 82.05% | 2,846 | 4,219 | – | – | – | – | – | 7,065 | ||||
| Saint-Sauveur | Con | Con | 4,184 | 50.51% | 1,082 | 13.06% | 85.80% | 3,102 | – | 4,184 | – | – | – | 998 | 8,284 | ||||
| Shefford | Lib | ALN | 3,708 | 53.30% | 459 | 6.60% | 85.29% | 3,249 | 3,708 | – | – | – | – | – | 6,957 | ||||
| Sherbrooke | Lib | ALN | 4,777 | 60.68% | 1,681 | 21.35% | 75.06% | 3,096 | 4,777 | – | – | – | – | – | 7,873 | ||||
| Soulanges | Lib | Lib | 1,287 | 57.66% | 342 | 15.32% | 85.75% | 1,287 | – | 945 | – | – | – | – | 2,232 | ||||
| Stanstead | Lib | ALN | 2,871 | 52.98% | 323 | 5.96% | 77.22% | 2,548 | 2,871 | – | – | – | – | – | 5,419 | ||||
| Témiscamingue | Lib | ALN | 2,929 | 53.63% | 1,343 | 24.59% | 70.10% | 1,586 | 2,929 | – | 853 | – | – | 94 | 5,462 | ||||
| Témiscouata | Lib | Lib | 2,112 | 53.25% | 258 | 6.51% | 87.03% | 2,112 | 1,854 | – | – | – | – | – | 3,966 | ||||
| Terrebonne | Lib | Lib | *Returning officer cast sole ballot (all others declared void)* | ||||||||||||||||
| Trois-Rivières | Con | Con | 4,873 | 57.03% | 1,202 | 14.07% | 86.70% | 3,671 | – | 4,873 | – | – | – | – | 8,544 | ||||
| Vaudreuil | Lib | Lib | 1,120 | 37.35% | 65 | 2.17% | 84.65% | 1,120 | – | 824 | 1,055 | – | – | – | 2,999 | ||||
| Verchères | Lib | Lib | 2,077 | 64.50% | 934 | 29.01% | 90.87% | 2,077 | 1,143 | – | – | – | – | – | 3,220 | ||||
| Westmount | Con | Con | 8,288 | 55.75% | 1,709 | 11.50% | 46.39% | 6,579 | – | 8,288 | – | – | – | – | 14,867 | ||||
| Wolfe | Lib | Lib | 2,023 | 51.89% | 147 | 3.77% | 88.27% | 2,023 | 1,876 | – | – | – | – | – | 3,899 | ||||
| Yamaska | Con | Con | 2,080 | 52.39% | 190 | 4.79% | 91.93% | 1,890 | – | 2,080 | – | – | – | – | 3,970 |
: = open seat : = turnout is above provincial average : = winning candidate was in previous Legislature : = incumbent had switched allegiance : = not incumbent; was previously elected to the Legislature : = incumbency arose from byelection gain : = previously incumbent in another riding : = other incumbents renominated : = previously an MP in the House of Commons of Canada : = multiple candidates
Analysis
| Party in 1st place | Party in 2nd place | Total | Lib | ALN | CON | Ind-Lib | Lib-Opp | Lab |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 43 | ||||
| *Action libérale nationale* | 24 | 1 | 1 | 26 | ||||
| 16 | 16 | |||||||
| 1 | 1 | |||||||
| Total | 41 | 26 | 13 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 86 |
| Parties | Acclaimed | Declared | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 1 | 43 | 41 | 2 | 90 | ||
| 26 | 26 | 2 | 54 | ||||
| 16 | 13 | 2 | 31 | ||||
| 1 | 4 | 12 | 2 | 19 | |||
| 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| 1 | 1 | ||||||
| 2 | 1 | 3 | |||||
| 1 | 1 | ||||||
| 1 | 1 | ||||||
| 1 | 1 |
| Source | Party | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| align="center" | **Lib** | **ALN** | align="center" | **Con** |
| Seats retained | Incumbents returned | 31 | ||
| Incumbents returned - acclaimed and declared | 4 | |||
| Open seats held | 9 | |||
| Seats changing hands | Incumbents defeated - new MLAs | 1 | ||
| Incumbents defeated - previous members returned | 1 | |||
| Open seats gained | 1 | 11 | ||
| Incumbent changed allegiance | 1 | |||
| **Total** | 47 | 26 |
References
References
- . (November 19, 1935). ["On compte 208 candidats en lice dans Québec"](https://numerique.banq.qc.ca/patrimoine/details/52327/4070636). *[[Le Droit]]*.
- . (November 20, 1935). ["Cinq candidats se retirent"](https://numerique.banq.qc.ca/patrimoine/details/52327/2794609). *[[Le Devoir]]*.
- . (December 16, 1935). ["M. le juge Guibeault déclare nulle l'élection de Terrebonne. L'officier-rapporteur élit M. David"](https://numerique.banq.qc.ca/patrimoine/details/52327/2794652). *[[Le Devoir]]*.
- . (December 17, 1935). ["Terrebonne votes all found illegal"](https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=7b4tAAAAIBAJ&sjid=C5kFAAAAIBAJ&pg=6617%2C1641440). *[[Montreal Gazette]]*.
- . (December 6, 1935). ["Le juge Guibault continue le recomptage du scrutin dans le comté de Terrebonne"](https://numerique.banq.qc.ca/patrimoine/details/52327/2794636). *[[Le Devoir]]*.
- . ["Election results (Terrebonne)"](https://www.assnat.qc.ca/fr/patrimoine/resultatselec/t.html#terr). *[[National Assembly of Quebec]]*.
- . (December 17, 1935). ["Unionists act quickly to bar David election"](https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=7b4tAAAAIBAJ&sjid=C5kFAAAAIBAJ&pg=6130%2C1610484). *[[Montreal Gazette]]*.
- . (April 14, 1936). ["David wins round in election fight"](https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=m34tAAAAIBAJ&sjid=B5kFAAAAIBAJ&pg=6798%2C1478486). *[[Montreal Gazette]]*.
- Drouilly, Pierre. (November 7, 2017). "Élections québécoises de 1935". Atlas des élections au Québec.
- . ["Les membres de l'Assemblée nationale par circonscription"](https://www.assnat.qc.ca/fr/patrimoine/depcir/index.html). *[[National Assembly of Quebec]]*.
- . (November 19, 1935). ["L'élection dans St-Louis"](https://numerique.banq.qc.ca/patrimoine/details/52327/2794607). *[[Le Devoir]]*.
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about 1935 Quebec general election — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report