From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
1919 Norwegian prohibition referendum
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| date | 5–6 October 1919 |
| country | Norway |
| yes | 489017 |
| no | 304673 |
| invalid | 3784 |
| electorate | 1198522 |
| map | Norwegian prohibition referendum, 1919.svg |
| map_size | 250 |
| map_caption | Results by county |
A referendum on introducing prohibition was held in Norway on 5 and 6 October 1919. Partial prohibition had been in effect since 1917, and the prohibition proposal did not include all types of alcohol, only spirits. The proposal was approved by 61.6% of voters. A second referendum on whether the prohibition should be maintained was held in 1926, resulting in an overturning of the law.
Results
By county
| County | Votes for (%) |
|---|---|
| Østfold | 65.4 |
| Akershus | 33.7 |
| Oslo | 21.0 |
| Hedmark | 49.2 |
| Oppland | 59.4 |
| Buskerud | 42.4 |
| Vestfold | 49.9 |
| Telemark | 72.6 |
| Aust-Agder | 76.3 |
| Vest-Agder | 77.6 |
| Rogaland | 82.1 |
| Hordaland | 80.8 |
| Bergen | 45.3 |
| Sogn og Fjordane | 79.2 |
| Møre og Romsdal | 88.0 |
| Sør-Trøndelag | 70.0 |
| Nord-Trøndelag | 77.8 |
| Nordland | 73.2 |
| Troms | 74.1 |
| Finnmark | 66.9 |
References
References
- [[Dieter Nohlen]] & Philip Stöver (2010) ''Elections in Europe: A data handbook'', p1438 {{ISBN. 978-3-8329-5609-7
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about 1919 Norwegian prohibition referendum — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report