From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
1918 Danish Folketing election
none
none
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| country | Denmark |
| previous_election | [1915](1915-danish-folketing-election) |
| next_election | April 1920 |
| seats_for_election | All 140 seats in the Folketing |
| majority_seats | 71 |
| election_date | 22 April 1918 |
| leader1 | Klaus Berntsen |
| party1 | Venstre (Denmark) |
| last_election1 | 43 |
| seats1 | 45 |
| percentage1 | 29.41 |
| leader2 | Thorvald Stauning |
| party2 | Social Democrats (Denmark) |
| last_election2 | 32 |
| seats2 | 39 |
| percentage2 | 28.66 |
| leader3 | Carl Theodor Zahle |
| party3 | Danish Social Liberal Party |
| last_election3 | 31 |
| seats3 | 32 |
| percentage3 | 20.67 |
| leader4 | Emil Piper |
| party4 | Conservative People's Party (Denmark) |
| last_election4 | New |
| seats4 | 22 |
| percentage4 | 18.29 |
| party5 | Industry Party |
| last_election5 | New |
| seats5 | 1 |
| percentage5 | 1.30 |
| leader6 | – |
| party6 | Independents |
| last_election6 | 0 |
| seats6 | 1 |
| percentage6 | 0.40 |
| title | Prime Minister |
| before_election | Carl Theodor Zahle |
| before_party | Danish Social Liberal Party |
| after_election | Carl Theodor Zahle |
| after_party | Danish Social Liberal Party |
| map | Folketing1918.svg |
Folketing elections were held in Denmark on 22 April 1918, the first in which women could vote. The result was a victory for Venstre, which won 45 of the 140 seats in the Folketing, which had been expanded from 114 to 140 seats. Voter turnout was 75.5%.
Electoral system
The Folketing was elected by rural–urban proportional representation. Copenhagen had 24 members elected by party-list proportional representation using the d'Hondt system, while in the rest of the country 93 members (42 in the Danish Islands and 51 in Jutland) were elected in single-member constituencies using first-past-the-post voting. There were a further 23 leveling seats to make the results more proportional.
Of the 23 leveling seats, twenty (nine in the islands and eleven in Jutland) were allocated on a regional basis, and three (one in the islands and two in Jutland) were allocated based on the nationwide vote (including Copenhagen). The allocation of candidates to leveling seats was based on a best-loser rule, using a form of Scorporo; in each single-member constituency a Hare quota of votes for the appropriate region was subtracted from the winner's votes and the remainders were pooled at a county level. The candidates with the highest proportion of the votes relative to the region's Hare quota were allocated the leveling seats.
The 1918 elections were the only ones in Danish history to feature this mixed system. Future elections would be entirely using proportional representation with the single-member districts not affecting the party-level results.
Results
References
References
- [[Dieter Nohlen]] & Philip Stöver (2010) ''Elections in Europe: A data handbook'', p524 {{ISBN. 978-3-8329-5609-7
- Nohlen & Stöver, p537
- Saby, R. S.. (1919). "Danish Parliamentary Elections of 1918". American Political Science Review.
- [https://www.thedanishparliament.dk/~/media/pdf/publikationer/english/the-parliamentary-system-of-denmark_2011.ashx The Parliamentary Electoral System in Denmark] {{Webarchive. link. (2022-01-21 Folketing)
- Adolph, Jensen. (July 1918). "Rigsdagsvalgene i April-Maj 1918 med Suppleringsvalg i Tiden 1915-18". Danmarks Statistik.
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about 1918 Danish Folketing election — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report