1886 Charleston earthquake

Earthquake

With the epicenter just northwest of Charleston, South Carolina, the shock was felt as far away as Boston, Massachusetts, to the north, Chicago, Illinois, and Milwaukee, Wisconsin, to the northwest, New Orleans, Louisiana, to the west, and across water to Cuba to the south and Bermuda to the east. The earthquake was so severe that outside the immediate area, there was speculation that the Florida peninsula had broken away from North America. There were at least 60 fatalities.

Sand boils were common throughout the affected area due to soil liquefaction. Aftershocks continued to be felt for weeks after the event. Minor earthquake activity that still continues in the area in the early 21st century may be a continuation of aftershocks.

With the development of earthquake studies and technology, this event has been extensively studied as an example of an intraplate earthquake. It is believed to have occurred on faults formed during the break-up of Pangaea. Similar faults are found all along the east coast of North America. It is thought that such ancient faults remain active from forces exerted on them by present-day motions of the North American plate. The exact mechanisms of intraplate earthquakes are a subject of much ongoing research.

Roger Bilham and Susan Hough studied historical mapping projects published between 1884 and 1919 and discovered a 1 m uplift at Summerville along the South Carolina Railroad. Photographic evidence of the South Carolina Railroad southeast of Summerville also showed a right-lateral offset of 4.5 ± 0.3 m on the track. Direct observation of the earthquake's effects also reported the rail bed being "forced to the right", supporting the identification of this offset. This offset occurred at the location of the Summerville Fault; the fault's position also aligns itself with the results of seismic reflection surveys. Seismicity of the area supports a north-northeast–south-southwest trending, west-dipping structure at an angle of 40–45°. They proposed a 27 km long rupture along the fault based on the description of extreme damage in Summerville and a lesser severity of damage in Pinopolis, further north of the proposed northern rupture termination.

Damage

Building damage

Within the city, many of the buildings sustained damage; some had to be torn down and rebuilt. The most prominent damage was done to buildings constructed out of brick, amounting to 81% of building damage. Buildings that had a wood frame suffered significantly less damage. Another factor that affected the percent of buildings destroyed was what kind of ground these buildings were built on. Buildings constructed on made ground were significantly more likely to be damaged than buildings constructed on solid ground; however, this relationship only occurred in wood-frame buildings, with 14% of wood-frame buildings built on made ground sustaining damage, compared to 0.5% of wood-frame buildings built on solid ground sustaining damage. This relationship was negligible as it pertains to the damage of buildings made of brick.

The most prominent buildings that were destroyed were commercial buildings, while residential buildings sustained significantly less damage. This is due to the fact that commercial buildings were older, had a more prominent top compared to the base of the building, and were made of brick.

The Old White Meeting House near Summerville, Dorchester County, South Carolina was reduced to ruins.

Other man-made structures were also damaged as a result of earth splits caused by the earthquake. Railroad tracks in Charleston and nearby areas were snapped and trains were derailed. Dams broke, which caused flooding in surrounding farms and roads. The ground liquefied in many spots which further damaged many buildings, roads, bridges, and farm fields.

Other damage

Wires were cut and the railroad tracks were torn apart, cutting residents off from the outside world. The damage was assessed to be between $5 million and $6 million. This would be about $112 million today. In total, there were about 60 deaths from the earthquake. The Charleston earthquake was then followed by a series of aftershocks. It was reported there to be 300 smaller aftershocks within the first 30 years following the earthquake in 1886 and 435 total.

Major damage occurred as far away as Tybee Island, Georgia, which is more than 60 miles away. Structural damage was reported several hundred miles from Charleston, including in central Alabama, central Ohio, eastern Kentucky, southern Virginia and western West Virginia.

Aftermath

Many building owners added earthquake bolts to existing unreinforced masonry buildings in order to add support to the structure to avoid having to demolish it because of instability. The bolts pass through the existing masonry walls, tying walls on opposite sides of the structure together for stability. Additionally, the South Carolina Emergency Management Division (SCEMD) has been created to plan disaster mitigation as well as respond to current disasters in order to reduce property damage and save lives.

Local photographer George LaGrange Cook took a series of photographs of the city after the quake, publishing them as Cook's Earthquake Views of Charleston and Vicinity. A collection of his work is held by the Gibbes Museum of Art in the city.

After the initial earthquake, for the next 30 years, there were 435 total aftershocks from the earthquake. Some of these started directly after the earthquake and were more frequent and the longer after the earthquake, the more spaced out the aftershocks were.

The initial shock in Charleston lasted for about 45 seconds and was extremely destructive, leaving nearly all of the 8,000 city structures with either interior damage or broken windows. The first aftershock followed just ten minutes later, and had the city rumbling once again. In the next 24 hours, at least seven different aftershocks were felt in Charleston and its surrounding areas. The earthquake and its aftershocks caused damage to buildings in cities such as Savannah and Augusta, Georgia, as well as Columbia, South Carolina, more than 100 miles from Charleston. The quake was even felt in cities as far as Boston and Chicago, where plaster fell from ceilings in upper floors of some buildings.

It has been estimated that if an earthquake of this size were to occur in the same place today, it would result in an approximately $20 billion loss just in South Carolina, as well as approximately 900 deaths and 44,000 injuries. However, as the earthquakes that have occurred in Charleston are large but infrequent, happening every 500–600 years, it is very unlikely that another earthquake of this size will occur any time soon.

References

References

1. Bollinger, G. A.. (1972). "Historical and recent seismic activity in South Carolina". [[Seismological Society of America]].
2. "Charleston Quake, 1886". United States Geological Survey.
3. (1889). "H.Ex.Doc. 50-1 – Report of the Secretary of the Interior, Volume IV: being part of the message and documents communicated to the two houses of Congress at the beginning of the ... session of the ... Congress".
4. Pickney, Paul. (1906). "Lessions Learned from the Charleston Quake".
5. (2023). "Modern earthquakes in US could be aftershocks from quakes in the 1800s, scientists say".
6. (2023). "The 1886 Charleston, South Carolina, Earthquake: Relic Railroad Offset Reveals Rupture". The Seismic Record.
7. (April 1, 1983). "Building damage at Charleston, South Carolina, associated with the 1886 earthquake". Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.
8. "Old White Meeting House Ruins and Cemetery, Dorchester County (SC Hwy 642, Summerville vicinity)". South Carolina Department of Archives and History.
9. Zalzal, Kate. "Benchmarks: August 31, 1886: Magnitude-7 earthquake rocks Charleston, South Carolina".
10. "Earthquake shakes Charleston, South Carolina".
11. "Benchmarks: August 31, 1886: Magnitude-7 earthquake rocks Charleston, South Carolina".
12. "The 1886 Charleston, South Carolina, Earthquake – A 1986 Perspective". United States Geological Survey.
13. Kevin P. Corbley. (Winter 2002–2003). "South Carolina Devises Earthquake Preparedness Plan With GIS".
14. (September 24, 2019). "Telling Tales". Charleston Magazine.
15. "Cook, George LaGrange – American".
16. Smith, Bruce. (August 31, 1986). "Charleston Still Shaking With Memories of 1886 Earthquake".
17. (June 2008). "Liquefaction Potential Map of Charleston, South Carolina Based on the 1886 Earthquake". Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering.
18. Ertle, Jamie. (September 30, 2021). "Seismologist discusses recent earthquakes in Lowcountry".
19. (2016). "Modern Seismicity and the Fault Responsible for the 1886 Charleston, South Carolina, Earthquake". Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.
20. (1993). "Seismicity of the United States, 1568–1989 (Revised)". [[United States Government Printing Office]].