From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
Quark–lepton complementarity
The quark–lepton complementarity (QLC) is a possible fundamental symmetry between quarks and leptons. First proposed in 1990 by Foot and Lew,
Possible evidence for QLC
Recent neutrino experiments confirm that the Pontecorvo–Maki–Nakagawa–Sakata matrix U contains large mixing angles. For example, atmospheric measurements of particle decay yield ≈ 45°, while solar experiments yield ≈ 34°. Compare these results with ≈ 9° which is clearly smaller, at about ~× the size, |display-authors=6 and with the quark mixing angles in the Cabibbo–Kobayashi–Maskawa matrix U . The disparity that nature indicates between quark and lepton mixing angles has been viewed in terms of a "quark–lepton complementarity" which can be expressed in the relations : \theta_{12}^\text{PMNS}+\theta_{12}^\text{CKM} \approx 45^\circ ,, : \theta_{23}^\text{PMNS}+\theta_{23}^\text{CKM} \approx 45^\circ ,. Possible consequences of QLC have been investigated in the literature and in particular a simple correspondence between the PMNS and CKM matrices have been proposed and analyzed in terms of a correlation matrix. The correlation matrix V is roughly{{efn| Since the CKM relates quarks to quarks, and the PMNS matrix relates leptons to leptons, the raw product uses "incompatible" co‑ordinates; at the very least, a unitary matrix should lie between them, to rotate their axes into some kind of alignment of lepton co‑ordinates to quark co‑ordinates, before multiplying them. However, lacking a clear theoretical motivation for any particular rotation as-yet, the product with the matrix axes without any alignment serves to provide estimates which may need later adjustment. defined as the product of the CKM and PMNS matrices: : V_\text{M} = U_\text{CKM} \cdot U_\text{PMNS} , ,
Unitarity implies: : U_\text{PMNS} = U^{\dagger}\text{CKM} V\text{M} , .
Open questions
One may ask where the large lepton mixings come from, and whether this information is implicit in the form of the V matrix. This question has been widely investigated in the literature, but its answer is still open. Furthermore, in some Grand Unification Theories (GUTs) the direct QLC correlation between the CKM and the PMNS mixing matrix can be obtained. In this class of models, the V matrix is determined by the heavy Majorana neutrino mass matrix.
Despite the naïve relations between the PMNS and CKM angles, a detailed analysis shows that the correlation matrix is phenomenologically compatible with a tribimaximal pattern, and only marginally with a bimaximal pattern. It is possible to include bimaximal forms of the correlation matrix V in models with renormalization effects that are relevant, however, only in particular cases with\ \tan \beta 40\ and with quasi-degenerate neutrino masses.
Footnotes
References
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about Quark–lepton complementarity — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report