Skip to content
Surf Wiki
Save to docs
general/1920s-aircraft-piston-engines

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

Pratt & Whitney R-1860 Hornet B

Early 20th century aircraft engine


Early 20th century aircraft engine

FieldValue
nameR-1860 Hornet B
imagePrattWhitney Hornet R-1860-B 1.JPG
captionPratt & Whitney R-1860 Hornet B
engine_typeRadial engine
national_originUnited States
manufacturerPratt & Whitney
first_run1929
major_applications
developed_fromPratt & Whitney R-1690

The Pratt & Whitney R-1860 Hornet B was a relatively uncommon aircraft engine. It was a development of Pratt & Whitney's earlier R-1690 Hornet and was basically similar, but enlarged in capacity from 1,690 to 1860 cuin. Cylinder bore was increased by 1/8" and the crankshaft stroke by 3/8". Both engines were air-cooled radial engines, with a single row of nine cylinders.

Design and development

The cylinder and valve design was typical for Pratt & Whitney, a simple design with two large valves driven by pushrods. The enlarged engine was designed by George Willgoos and was first available in 1929.

The Hornet series of engines was similar to the Wasp, but larger. In both series a nine-cylinder single-row engine was later supplemented by an enlarged fourteen cylinder engine, with two rows of the same cylinders, but reduced in number to seven per row to aid cooling to the rear row (it was never made into a larger, 18 cylinder radial like the related Wasp was).

Two of these engines, the enlarged single-row Hornet B described here and the R-1830 Twin Wasp, were of near-identical displacement (1860 vs. 1830), although the fourteen-cylinder Twin Wasp was more complex and costly than the nine-cylinder, single-row Hornet B. The Twin Wasp was by far the more powerful engine though, even in its early versions it produced 800 bhp to the Hornet B's 575 bhp. Having more cylinders per the same displacement also creates a smoother engine, since the individual pistons are smaller and lighter, and the stroke is shorter, which reduces the vibration of reciprocation, and therefore crew and mechanical fatigue. The reduced stroke also allows for a higher maximum RPM limit, since the mean piston speed is reduced, the distance the piston has to cover per each engine revolution being shorter. Having a shorter stroke but a higher rpm limit for the same displacement reduces the peak torque levels, but allows for a higher maximum horsepower rating. A further advantage was the reduced diameter of the Wasp: 48 inches compared to 57. This reduced drag, and the relatively large diameter of the Hornet would also have been a serious drawback for visibility if used in a small single-engined aircraft.

Although a technically competent design, the enlarged Hornet B engine was not a commercial success. Customers preferred to buy the R-1830 Twin Wasp instead, which in time became the most numerous aircraft engine ever produced.

Applications

  • Bellanca C-27 Airbus
  • Boeing Monomail
  • Boeing YB-9
  • Consolidated Commodore
  • Consolidated Fleetster
  • Fokker F-32
  • Keystone B-4A
  • Keystone LB-8 (prototype only)
  • Keystone XLB-12 (engine evaluation testbed only)
  • Martin XT6M (prototype only)
  • Sikorsky S-40
  • Sikorsky S-41

Specifications

and start a new, fully formatted line with -- and Aircraft Piston Engines by Herschel Smith |power/weight=

References

;Notes

;Bibliography

References

  1. Gunston, p.163
  2. Connors, p.79
  3. Smithsonian
Info: Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about Pratt & Whitney R-1860 Hornet B — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report