NATO

History

Main article: History of NATO

20th century

NATO has its roots in the Atlantic Charter, a 1941 agreement between the United States and United Kingdom. The Charter laid out a framework for international cooperation without territorial expansion after World War II. On 4 March 1947, the Treaty of Dunkirk was signed by France and the United Kingdom during the aftermath of World War II and the start of the Cold War as a Treaty of Alliance and Mutual Assistance in the event of possible attacks by Germany. In March 1948, this alliance was expanded in the Treaty of Brussels to include the Benelux countries, forming the Brussels Treaty Organization, commonly known as the Western Union. Talks for a wider military alliance, which could include North America, also began that month in the United States, where their foreign policy under the Truman Doctrine set out in 1947 promoted international solidarity against actions they saw as communist aggression, such as the February 1948 coup d'état in Czechoslovakia. These talks resulted in the signature of the North Atlantic Treaty on 4 April 1949 by the member states of the Western Union plus the United States, Canada, Portugal, Italy, Norway, Denmark, and Iceland. Canadian diplomat Lester B. Pearson was a key author and drafter of the treaty.

The North Atlantic Treaty was largely dormant until the Korean War initiated the establishment of NATO to implement it with an integrated military structure. This included the formation of Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE) in 1951, which adopted many of the Western Union's military structures and plans, including their agreements on standardizing equipment and agreements on stationing foreign military forces in European countries. In 1952, the post of Secretary General of NATO was established as the organization's chief civilian. That year also saw the first major NATO maritime exercises, Exercise Mainbrace and the accession of Greece and Turkey to the organization. Following the London and Paris Conferences, West Germany was permitted to rearm militarily, as they joined NATO in May 1955, which was, in turn, a major factor in the creation of the Soviet-dominated Warsaw Pact, delineating the two opposing sides of the Cold War.

The building of the Berlin Wall in 1961 marked a height in Cold War tensions, when 400,000 US troops were stationed in Europe. Doubts over the strength of the relationship between the European states and the United States ebbed and flowed, along with doubts over the credibility of the NATO defence against a prospective Soviet invasion – doubts that led to the development of the independent French nuclear deterrent and the withdrawal of France from NATO's military structure in 1966. In 1982, the newly democratic Spain joined the alliance.

The Revolutions of 1989 in Europe led to a strategic re-evaluation of NATO's purpose, nature, tasks, and focus on the continent. In October 1990, East Germany became part of the Federal Republic of Germany and the alliance, and in November 1990, the alliance signed the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe (CFE) in Paris with the Soviet Union. It mandated specific military reductions across the continent, which continued after the collapse of the Warsaw Pact in February 1991 and the dissolution of the Soviet Union that December, which removed the de facto main adversaries of NATO. This began a drawdown of military spending and equipment in Europe. The CFE treaty allowed signatories to remove 52,000 pieces of conventional armaments in the following sixteen years, and allowed military spending by NATO's European members to decline by 28 percent from 1990 to 2015. In 1990, several Western leaders gave assurances to Mikhail Gorbachev that NATO would not expand further east, as revealed by memoranda of private conversations.

In the 1990s, the organization extended its activities into political and humanitarian situations that had not formerly been NATO concerns. During the breakup of Yugoslavia, the organization conducted its first military interventions in Bosnia from 1992 to 1995 and later Yugoslavia in 1999.

Politically, the organization sought better relations with the newly autonomous Central and Eastern European states, and diplomatic forums for regional cooperation between NATO and its neighbours were set up during this post-Cold War period, including the Partnership for Peace and the Mediterranean Dialogue initiative in 1994, the Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council in 1997, and the NATO–Russia Permanent Joint Council in 1998. At the 1999 Washington summit, Hungary, Poland, and the Czech Republic officially joined NATO, and the organization also issued new guidelines for membership with individualized "Membership Action Plans". These plans governed the subsequent addition of new alliance members.

21st century

Article 5 of the North Atlantic treaty, requiring member states to come to the aid of any member state subject to an armed attack, was invoked for the first and only time after the September 11 attacks, after which troops were deployed to Afghanistan under the NATO-led ISAF. The organization has operated a range of additional roles since then, including sending trainers to Iraq, assisting in counter-piracy operations.

The election of French president Nicolas Sarkozy in 2007 led to a major reform of France's military position, culminating with the return to full membership on 4 April 2009, which also included France rejoining the NATO Military Command Structure, while maintaining an independent nuclear deterrent.

The 2014 Russian annexation of Crimea led to strong condemnation by all NATO members, and was one of the seven times that Article 4, which calls for consultation among NATO members, has been invoked. Prior times included during the Iraq War and Syrian civil war. At the 2014 Wales summit, the leaders of NATO's member states formally committed for the first time to spend the equivalent of at least two percent of their gross domestic products on defence by 2024, which had previously been only an informal guideline.

At the 2016 Warsaw summit, NATO countries agreed on the creation of NATO Enhanced Forward Presence, which deployed four multinational battalion-sized battlegroups in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland. Before and during the Russo-Ukrainian war, several NATO countries sent ground troops, warships and fighter aircraft to reinforce the alliance's eastern flank, and multiple countries again invoked Article 4. In March 2022, NATO leaders met at Brussels for an extraordinary summit which also involved Group of Seven and European Union leaders. NATO member states agreed to establish four additional battlegroups in Bulgaria, Hungary, Romania, and Slovakia, and elements of the NATO Response Force were activated for the first time in NATO's history.

As of June 2022, NATO had deployed 40,000 troops along its 2,500 km Eastern flank to deter Russian aggression. More than half of this number have been deployed in Bulgaria, Romania, Hungary, Slovakia, and Poland, which five countries muster a considerable combined ex-NATO force of 259,000 troops. To supplement Bulgaria's Air Force, Spain sent Eurofighter Typhoons, the Netherlands sent eight F-35 attack aircraft, and additional French and US attack aircraft would arrive soon as well. In 2025, Germany stationed a full armoured brigade in Lithuania.

Military operations

Main article: List of NATO operations

Early operations

No military operations were conducted by NATO during the Cold War. Following the end of the Cold War, the first operations, Anchor Guard in 1990 and Ace Guard in 1991, were prompted by the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait. Airborne early warning aircraft were sent to provide coverage of southeastern Turkey, and later a quick-reaction force was deployed to the area.

Bosnia and Herzegovina intervention

Main article: NATO intervention in Bosnia and Herzegovina

The Bosnian War began in 1992, as a result of the breakup of Yugoslavia. The deteriorating situation led to United Nations Security Council Resolution 816 on 9 October 1992, authorizing its member-states to enforce a previously declared no-fly zone under the United Nations Protection Force over central Bosnia and Herzegovina. NATO complied and started enforcing the ban on 12 April 1993 with Operation Deny Flight. From June 1993 until October 1996, Operation Sharp Guard added maritime enforcement of the arms embargo and economic sanctions against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. On 28 February 1994, NATO took its first wartime action by shooting down four Bosnian Serb aircraft violating the no-fly zone.

On 10 and 11 April 1994, the United Nations Protection Force called in air strikes to protect the Goražde safe area, resulting in the bombing of a Bosnian Serb military command outpost near Goražde by two US F-16 jets acting under NATO direction. In retaliation, Serbs took 150 U.N. personnel hostage on 14 April. On 16 April a British Sea Harrier was shot down over Goražde by Serb forces.

In August 1995, a two-week NATO bombing campaign, Operation Deliberate Force, began against the Army of the Republika Srpska, after the Srebrenica genocide. Further NATO air strikes helped bring the Yugoslav Wars to an end, resulting in the Dayton Agreement in November 1995.

Kosovo intervention

Main article: NATO bombing of Yugoslavia, Kosovo Force

In an effort to stop Slobodan Milošević's Serbian-led crackdown on KLA separatists and Albanian civilians in Kosovo, the United Nations Security Council passed Resolution 1199 on 23 September 1998 to demand a ceasefire.

Negotiations under US Special Envoy Richard Holbrooke broke down on 23 March 1999, and he handed the matter to NATO, which acted on protecting regional security and started a 78-day bombing campaign on 24 March 1999. Operation Allied Force targeted the military capabilities of what was then the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. During the crisis, NATO also deployed one of its international reaction forces, the ACE Mobile Force (Land), to Albania as the Albania Force (AFOR), to deliver humanitarian aid to refugees from Kosovo.

The campaign was and has been criticized over its civilian casualties, including the bombing of the Chinese embassy in Belgrade, and over whether it had legitimacy. The US, the UK, and most other NATO countries opposed efforts to require the UN Security Council to approve NATO military strikes, such as the action against Serbia in 1999, while France and some others claimed that the alliance needed UN approval. The US/UK side claimed that this would undermine the authority of the alliance, and they noted that Russia and China would have exercised their Security Council vetoes to block the strike on Yugoslavia, and could do the same in future conflicts where NATO intervention was required, thus nullifying the entire potency and purpose of the organization. Recognizing the post-Cold War military environment, NATO adopted the Alliance Strategic Concept during its Washington summit in April 1999 that emphasized conflict prevention and crisis management.

Milošević finally accepted the terms of an international peace plan on 3 June 1999, ending the Kosovo War. On 11 June, Milošević further accepted UN resolution 1244, under the mandate of which NATO then helped establish the KFOR peacekeeping force. Nearly one million refugees had fled Kosovo, and part of KFOR's mandate was to protect the humanitarian missions, in addition to deterring violence. In August–September 2001, the alliance also mounted Operation Essential Harvest, a mission disarming ethnic Albanian militias in the Republic of Macedonia. , around 4,500 KFOR soldiers, representing 27 countries, continue to operate in the area.

War in Afghanistan

Main article: International Security Assistance Force, War in Afghanistan (2001–2021)

The September 11 attacks in the United States caused NATO to invoke Article 5 of the NATO Charter for the first time in the organization's history. The Article states that an attack on any member shall be considered to be an attack on all. The invocation was confirmed on 4 October 2001 when NATO determined that the attacks were indeed eligible under the terms of the North Atlantic Treaty. The eight official actions taken by NATO in response to the attacks included Operation Eagle Assist and Operation Active Endeavour, a naval operation in the Mediterranean Sea designed to prevent the movement of terrorists or weapons of mass destruction, and to enhance the security of shipping in general, which began on 4 October 2001.

The alliance showed unity: on 16 April 2003, NATO agreed to take command of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF), which included troops from 42 countries. The decision came at the request of Germany and the Netherlands, the two countries leading ISAF at the time of the agreement, and all nineteen NATO ambassadors approved it unanimously. The handover of control to NATO took place on 11 August, and marked the first time in NATO's history that it took charge of a mission outside the north Atlantic area.

ISAF was initially charged with securing Kabul and surrounding areas from the Taliban, al-Qaeda and factional warlords, so as to allow for the establishment of the Afghan Transitional Administration headed by Hamid Karzai. In October 2003, the UN Security Council authorized the expansion of the ISAF mission throughout Afghanistan, and ISAF subsequently expanded the mission in four main stages over the whole of the country.

On 31 July 2006, the ISAF additionally took over military operations in the south of Afghanistan from a US-led anti-terrorism coalition. Due to the intensity of the fighting in the south, in 2011 France allowed a squadron of Mirage 2000 fighter/attack aircraft to be moved into the area, to Kandahar, in order to reinforce the alliance's efforts. During its 2012 Chicago Summit, NATO endorsed a plan to end the Afghanistan war and to remove the NATO-led ISAF Forces by the end of December 2014. ISAF was disestablished in December 2014 and replaced by the follow-on training Resolute Support Mission.

On 14 April 2021, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said the alliance had agreed to start withdrawing its troops from Afghanistan by 1 May. Soon after the withdrawal of NATO troops started, the Taliban launched an offensive against the Afghan government, quickly advancing in front of collapsing Afghan Armed Forces. By 15 August 2021, Taliban militants controlled the vast majority of Afghanistan and had encircled the capital city of Kabul. Some politicians in NATO member states have described the chaotic withdrawal of Western troops from Afghanistan and the collapse of the Afghan government as the greatest debacle that NATO has suffered since its founding.

Iraq training mission

Main article: NATO Training Mission – Iraq

In August 2004, during the Iraq War, NATO formed the NATO Training Mission – Iraq, a training mission to assist the Iraqi security forces in conjunction with the US-led MNF-I. The NATO Training Mission-Iraq (NTM-I) was established at the request of the Iraqi Interim Government under the provisions of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1546. The aim of NTM-I was to assist in the development of Iraqi security forces training structures and institutions so that Iraq can build an effective and sustainable capability that addresses the needs of the country. NTM-I was not a combat mission but is a distinct mission, under the political control of the North Atlantic Council. Its operational emphasis was on training and mentoring. The activities of the mission were coordinated with Iraqi authorities and the US-led Deputy Commanding General Advising and Training, who was also dual-hatted as the Commander of NTM-I. The mission officially concluded on 17 December 2011.

Turkey invoked the first Article 4 meetings in 2003 at the start of the Iraq War. Turkey also invoked this article twice in 2012 during the Syrian civil war, after the downing of an unarmed Turkish F-4 reconnaissance jet, and after a mortar was fired at Turkey from Syria, and again in 2015 after threats by Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant to its territorial integrity.

Gulf of Aden anti-piracy

Main article: Operation Ocean Shield

In 2008 the United Nations Secretary-General called on member-states to protect the ships of , which was distributing aid as part of the World Food Programme mission in Somalia.

The North Atlantic Council and other countries, including Russia, China and South Korea, formed Operation Ocean Shield. The operation sought to dissuade and interrupt pirate attacks, protect vessels, and to increase the general level of security in the region. Beginning on 17 August 2009, NATO deployed warships in an operation to protect maritime traffic in the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean from Somali pirates, and help strengthen the navies and coast guards of regional states.

Libya intervention

Main article: 2011 military intervention in Libya

During the Libyan Civil War, violence between protesters and the Libyan government under Colonel Muammar Gaddafi escalated, and on 17 March 2011 led to the passage of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973, which called for a ceasefire, and authorized military action to protect civilians. A coalition that included several NATO members began enforcing a no-fly zone over Libya shortly afterwards, beginning with Opération Harmattan by the French Air Force on 19 March.

On 20 March 2011, NATO states agreed on enforcing an arms embargo against Libya with Operation Unified Protector using ships from NATO Standing Maritime Group 1 and Standing Mine Countermeasures Group 1, and additional ships and submarines from NATO members. They would "monitor, report and, if needed, interdict vessels suspected of carrying illegal arms or mercenaries".

On 24 March, NATO agreed to take control of the no-fly zone from the initial coalition, while command of targeting ground units remained with the coalition's forces. NATO began officially enforcing the UN resolution on 27 March 2011 with assistance from Qatar and the United Arab Emirates. By June, reports of divisions within the alliance surfaced as only eight of the 28 member states were participating in combat operations, resulting in a confrontation between US Defense Secretary Robert Gates and countries such as Poland, Spain, the Netherlands, Turkey, and Germany with Gates calling on the latter to contribute more and the latter believing the organization has overstepped its mandate in the conflict. In his final policy speech in Brussels on 10 June, Gates further criticized allied countries in suggesting their actions could cause the demise of NATO. The German foreign ministry pointed to "a considerable [German] contribution to NATO and NATO-led operations" and to the fact that this engagement was highly valued by President Obama.

While the mission was extended into September, Norway that day (10 June) announced it would begin scaling down contributions and complete withdrawal by 1 August. Earlier that week it was reported Danish air fighters were running out of bombs. The following week, the head of the Royal Navy said the country's operations in the conflict were not sustainable. By the end of the mission in October 2011, after the death of Colonel Gaddafi, NATO planes had flown about 9,500 strike sorties against pro-Gaddafi targets. A report from the organization Human Rights Watch in May 2012 identified at least 72 civilians killed in the campaign.

Following a coup d'état attempt in October 2013, Libyan Prime Minister Ali Zeidan requested technical advice and trainers from NATO to assist with ongoing security issues.

Turkish border

Main article: Operation Active Fence

Use of Article 5 has been threatened multiple times and four out of seven official Article 4 consultations have been called due to spillover in Turkey from the Syrian civil war. In April 2012, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan considered invoking Article 5 of the NATO treaty to protect Turkish national security in a dispute over the Syrian civil war. The alliance responded quickly, and a spokesperson said the alliance was "monitoring the situation very closely and will continue to do so" and "takes it very seriously protecting its members."

After the shooting down of a Turkish military jet by Syria in June 2012 and Syrian forces shelling Turkish cities in October 2012 resulting in two Article 4 consultations, NATO approved Operation Active Fence. In the past decade the conflict has only escalated. In response to the 2015 Suruç bombing, which Turkey attributed to ISIS, and other security issues along its southern border, Turkey called for an emergency meeting. The latest consultation happened in February 2020, as part of increasing tensions due to the Northwestern Syria offensive, which involved Syrian and suspected Russian airstrikes on Turkish troops, and risked direct confrontation between Russia and a NATO member.

Eastern flank

Main article: Operation Eastern Sentry

Operation Eastern Sentry is a NATO military initiative launched in response to Russian drone incursions into Polish airspace in September 2025. The operation aims to strengthen the alliance's eastern flank and deter further aggression. Multiple member states are contributing military assets, including fighter jets and naval units, to enhance air and ground defense capabilities. Eastern Sentry is designed to provide a flexible and agile response to threats, with a focus on countering drone technology.

Membership

Main article: Member states of NATO

The 32 NATO members are:

• Albania
• Belgium
• Bulgaria
• Canada
• Croatia
• Czech Republic
• Denmark
• Estonia
• Finland
• France
• Germany
• Greece
• Hungary
• Iceland
• Italy
• Latvia
• Lithuania
• Luxembourg
• Montenegro
• Netherlands
• North Macedonia
• Norway
• Poland
• Portugal
• Romania
• Slovakia
• Slovenia
• Spain
• Sweden
• Turkey
• United Kingdom
• United States

|}

NATO has thirty-two members, mostly in Europe with two in North America. NATO's "area of responsibility", within which attacks on member states are eligible for an Article 5 response, is defined under Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty to include member territory in Europe, North America, Turkey, and islands in the North Atlantic north of the Tropic of Cancer. Attacks on vessels, aircraft and other forces in the North Atlantic (again, north of the Tropic of Cancer) and the Mediterranean Sea may also provoke an Article 5 response. During the original treaty negotiations, the United States insisted that colonies such as the Belgian Congo be excluded from the treaty. French Algeria was, however, covered until its independence on 3 July 1962. Twelve of these thirty-two are original members who joined in 1949, while the other twenty joined in one of ten enlargement rounds.

Special arrangements

The three Nordic countries which joined NATO as founding members, Denmark, Iceland, and Norway, chose to limit their participation in three areas: there would be no permanent peacetime bases, no nuclear warheads and no Allied military activity (unless invited) permitted on their territory. However, Denmark allows the U.S. Space Force to maintain Pituffik Space Base, in Greenland.

From the mid-1960s to the mid-1990s, France pursued a military strategy of independence from NATO under a policy dubbed "Gaullo-Mitterrandism". Nicolas Sarkozy negotiated the return of France to the integrated military command and the Defence Planning Committee in 2009, the latter being disbanded the following year. France remains the only NATO member outside the Nuclear Planning Group and, unlike the United States and the United Kingdom, will not commit its nuclear-armed submarines to the alliance.

Enlargement

Main article: Enlargement of NATO

NATO was established on 4 April 1949 by the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty (Washington Treaty). The 12 founding members of the alliance were Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Iceland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

Four new members joined during the Cold War: Greece (1952), Turkey (1952), West Germany (1955) and Spain (1982). Following the dissolution of the Soviet Union, many former Warsaw Pact and post-Soviet states sought membership. In 1990, the territory of the former East Germany was added with the reunification of Germany. At the 1999 Washington summit, Hungary, Poland, and the Czech Republic officially joined, and NATO issued new guidelines for membership, with individualized "Membership Action Plans". These plans governed the addition of new members: Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia in 2004, Albania and Croatia in 2009, Montenegro in 2017, and North Macedonia in 2020. Finland and Sweden are the newest members, joining in 2023 and 2024 respectively, spurred on by the Russo-Ukrainian war.

Ukraine's relationship with NATO began with the NATO–Ukraine Action Plan in 2002. In 2005, Russian president Vladimir Putin said that if Ukraine joined NATO, "we will respect their choice, because it is their sovereign right to decide their own defence policy, and this will not worsen relations between our countries". However, since his 2007 Munich speech, Putin has strongly opposed further enlargement. In 2010, under President Viktor Yanukovych, Ukraine re-affirmed its non-aligned status and renounced aspirations of joining NATO. During the 2014 Ukrainian Revolution, Russia occupied Crimea and supported armed separatists in eastern Ukraine. Because of this, in December 2014 Ukraine's parliament voted to end its non-aligned status, and in 2019 it enshrined the goal of NATO membership in the Constitution. At the June 2021 Brussels Summit, NATO leaders affirmed that Ukraine would eventually join, and supported Ukraine's right to self-determination without interference. In late 2021, there was another massive Russian military buildup on Ukraine's borders. Russian president Putin warned that Ukraine joining NATO, and the deployment of missile defense systems or long-range missiles in Ukraine, would cross a red line. However, Ukraine was a long way from potential membership, and there were no such plans to deploy missiles. The Russian Foreign Ministry drafted a treaty that would forbid Ukraine or any former Soviet state from ever joining NATO. Secretary-General Stoltenberg replied that the decision is up to Ukraine and NATO members, adding "Russia has no veto...and Russia has no right to establish a sphere of influence to try to control their neighbors". NATO offered to improve communications with Russia and discuss missile placements and military exercises, as long as Russia withdrew troops from Ukraine's borders. However, relations diminished after the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Ukraine applied for NATO membership in September 2022 after Russia proclaimed it had annexed the country's southeast.

Georgia was promised "future membership" during the 2008 summit in Bucharest, but US president Barack Obama said in 2014 that the country was not "currently on a path" to membership.

Russian leaders have said that NATO enlargement went against informal understandings between Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev and European and US negotiators that allowed for peaceful German reunification. A June 2016 Levada Center poll found that 68 percent of Russians think that deploying NATO troops in the Baltic states and Poland – former Eastern bloc countries bordering Russia – is a threat to Russia. In contrast, 65 percent of Poles surveyed in a 2017 Pew Research Center report identified Russia as a "major threat", with an average of 31 percent saying so across all NATO countries, and 67 percent of Poles surveyed in 2018 favour US forces being based in Poland. Of non-CIS Eastern European countries surveyed by Gallup in 2016, all but Serbia and Montenegro were more likely than not to view NATO as a protective alliance rather than a threat. A 2006 study in the journal Security Studies argued that NATO enlargement contributed to democratic consolidation in Central and Eastern Europe. China also opposes further expansion.

NATO defence expenditure

Direct contributions

Member states pay for NATO's three common funds (the civil and military budgets and the security investment programme) based on a cost-sharing formula that includes per capita gross national income and other factors. In 2023–2024, the United States and Germany were the biggest contributors to the NATO budget at 16.2% each.

Indirect contributions

Member states pay for and maintain their own troops and equipment. They contribute to NATO operations and missions by committing troops and equipment on a voluntary basis. Since 2006, the goal has been for each country to spend at least 2 percent of its gross domestic product on its own defence; in 2014, a NATO declaration said that countries not meeting the goal would "aim to move towards the 2 percent guideline within a decade". In July 2022, NATO estimated that 11 members would meet the target in 2023. On 14 February 2024, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said that 18 member states would meet the 2% target in 2024. On 17 June 2024, prior to the 2024 Washington summit, Stoltenberg updated that figure and announced that a record 23 of 32 NATO member states were meeting their defense spending targets of 2% of their country's GDP. NATO added that defense spending for European member states and Canada was up 18% in the past year alone.

Partnerships with third countries

Main article: Foreign relations of NATO

The Partnership for Peace (PfP) programme was established in 1994 and is based on individual bilateral relations between each partner country and NATO: each country may choose the extent of its participation. Members include all current and former members of the Commonwealth of Independent States. The Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council (EAPC) was first established on 29 May 1997, and is a forum for regular coordination, consultation and dialogue between all fifty participants. The PfP programme is considered the operational wing of the Euro-Atlantic Partnership.

The European Union (EU) signed a comprehensive package of arrangements with NATO under the Berlin Plus agreement on 16 December 2002. With this agreement, the EU was given the possibility of using NATO assets if it wanted to act independently in an international crisis, on the condition that NATO itself did not want to act – the so-called "right of first refusal". For example, Article 42(7) of the 1982 Treaty of Lisbon specifies that "If a Member State is the victim of armed aggression on its territory, the other Member States shall have towards it an obligation of aid and assistance by all the means in their power". The treaty applies globally to specified territories, whereas NATO is restricted under its Article 6 to operations north of the Tropic of Cancer. It provides a "double framework" for the EU countries that are also linked with the PfP programme.

Additionally, NATO cooperates and discusses its activities with numerous other non-NATO members. The Mediterranean Dialogue was established in 1994 to coordinate in a similar way with Israel and countries in North Africa. The Istanbul Cooperation Initiative was announced in 2004 as a dialogue forum for the Middle East along the same lines as the Mediterranean Dialogue. The four participants are also linked through the Gulf Cooperation Council. In June 2018, Qatar expressed a wish to join NATO, who ruled it out, saying that only additional European countries could join according to Article 10 of NATO's founding treaty. Qatar and NATO had earlier signed a joint security agreement, in January 2018.

Political dialogue with Japan began in 1990, and since then, the Alliance has gradually increased its contact with countries that do not form part of any of these cooperation initiatives. In 1998, NATO established a set of general guidelines that do not allow for a formal institutionalization of relations, but reflect the Allies' desire to increase cooperation. Following extensive debate, the term "Contact Countries" was agreed by the Allies in 2000. By 2012, the Alliance had broadened this group, which meets to discuss issues such as counter-piracy and technology exchange, under the names "global partners" or "partners across the globe". Australia and New Zealand, both global partners, are also members of the AUSCANNZUKUS strategic alliance, and similar regional or bilateral agreements between contact countries and NATO members also aid cooperation. NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg stated that NATO needs to "address the rise of China", by closely cooperating with Australia, New Zealand, Japan and South Korea. Colombia is NATO's latest partner and has access to the full range of cooperative activities offered; it is the first and only Latin American country to cooperate with NATO.

Structure

Main article: Structure of NATO

All agencies and organizations of NATO are integrated into either the civilian administrative or military executive roles. For the most part, they perform roles and functions that directly or indirectly support the security role of the alliance as a whole.

The civilian structure includes:

• The North Atlantic Council (NAC) is the body which has effective governance authority and powers of decision in NATO, consisting of member states' permanent representatives or representatives at higher level (ministers of foreign affairs or defence, or heads of state or government). The NAC convenes at least once a week and takes major decisions regarding NATO's policies. The meetings of the North Atlantic Council are chaired by the secretary general and, when decisions have to be made, action is agreed upon by consensus. There is no voting or decision by majority. Each state represented at the Council table or on any of its subordinate committees retains complete sovereignty and responsibility for its own decisions.
• The NATO Parliamentary Assembly (NATO PA) is a body that sets broad strategic goals for NATO, which meets at two session per year. NATO PA interacts directly with the parliamentary structures of the national governments of the member states which appoint Permanent Members, or ambassadors to NATO. The NATO Parliamentary Assembly is made up of legislators from the member countries of the North Atlantic Alliance as well as thirteen associate members. It is however officially a structure different from NATO, and has as aim to join deputies of NATO countries in order to discuss security policies on the NATO Council.
• NATO headquarters, located on Boulevard Léopold III/Leopold III-laan, B-1110 Brussels, which is in the City of Brussels municipality. The staff at the Headquarters is composed of national delegations of member countries and includes civilian and military liaison offices and officers or diplomatic missions and diplomats of partner countries, as well as the International Staff and International Military Staff filled from serving members of the armed forces of member states. Non-governmental groups have also grown up in support of NATO, broadly under the banner of the Atlantic Council/Atlantic Treaty Association movement.

The military structure includes:

• The Military Committee (MC) is the body of NATO that is composed of member states' Chiefs of Defence (CHOD) and advises the North Atlantic Council (NAC) on military policy and strategy. The national CHODs are regularly represented in the MC by their permanent Military Representatives (MilRep), who often are two- or three-star flag officers. Like the council, from time to time the Military Committee also meets at a higher level, namely at the level of Chiefs of Defence, the most senior military officer in each country's armed forces. The MC is led by its chairman, who directs NATO's military operations. Until 2008 the Military Committee excluded France, due to that country's 1966 decision to remove itself from the NATO Military Command Structure, which it rejoined in 1995. Until France rejoined NATO, it was not represented on the Defence Planning Committee, and this led to conflicts between it and NATO members. Such was the case in the lead up to Operation Iraqi Freedom.
• Allied Command Operations (ACO) is the NATO command responsible for NATO operations worldwide.
• The Rapid Deployable Corps include Eurocorps, I. German/Dutch Corps, Multinational Corps Northeast, and NATO Rapid Deployable Italian Corps among others, as well as naval High Readiness Forces (HRFs), which all report to Allied Command Operations.
• Allied Command Transformation (ACT), responsible for transformation and training of NATO forces.

Legal authority of NATO commanders

NATO is an alliance of 32 sovereign states and their individual sovereignty is unaffected by participation in the alliance. NATO has no parliaments, no laws, no enforcement, and no power to punish individual citizens. As a consequence of this lack of sovereignty the power and authority of a NATO commander are limited. NATO commanders cannot punish offences such as failure to obey a lawful order; dereliction of duty; or disrespect to a senior officer. NATO commanders expect obedience but sometimes need to subordinate their desires or plans to the operators who are themselves subject to sovereign codes of conduct like the UCMJ. A case in point was the clash between General Sir Mike Jackson and General Wesley Clark over KFOR actions at Pristina Airport.

NATO commanders can issue orders to their subordinate commanders in the form of operational plans (OPLANs), operational orders (OPORDERs), tactical direction, or fragmental orders (FRAGOs) and others. The joint rules of engagement must be followed, and the Law of Armed Conflict must be obeyed at all times. Operational resources "remain under national command but have been transferred temporarily to NATO. Although these national units, through the formal process of transfer of authority, have been placed under the operational command and control of a NATO commander, they never lose their national character." Senior national representatives, like CDS, "are designated as so-called red-cardholders". Caveats are restrictions listed "nation by nation... that NATO Commanders... must take into account".

References

Works cited

References

1. "Defence Expenditure of NATO Countries (2014–2024)". NATO.
2. (17 September 1949). "Final Communiqué". NATO.
3. (4 April 1949). "The North Atlantic Treaty". NATO.
4. "Mark Rutte takes office as NATO Secretary General". NATO.
5. NATO. "Defence expenditures and NATO's 5% commitment".
6. (10 June 2021). "Biden, Johnson sign new Atlantic Charter on trade, defense amid Covid recovery".
7. (December 2009). "The origins of WEU: Western Union".
8. "A short history of NATO". NATO.
9. "Canada and NATO – 1949".
10. (2011). "Speaking Out: A Congressman's Lifelong Fight Against Bigotry, Famine, and War". Chicago Review Press, Incorporated.
11. (1973). "The McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of World Biography: An International Reference Work". McGraw-Hill.
12. Ismay, Hastings. (4 September 2001). "NATO the first five years 1949–1954". NATO.
13. Baldwin, Hanson. (28 September 1952). "Navies Meet the Test in Operation Mainbrace". New York Times.
14. (24 March 1952). "NATO: The Man with the Oilcan".
15. Glass, Andrew. (14 May 2014). "Soviet Union establishes Warsaw Pact, May 14, 1955".
16. Olmsted, Dan. (September 2020). "Should the United States Keep Troops in Germany?".
17. Cody, Edward. (12 March 2009). "After 43 Years, France to Rejoin NATO as Full Member". [[The Washington Post]].
18. "Spain and NATO". Source: U.S. Library of Congress.
19. Harding, Luke. (14 July 2007). "Kremlin tears up arms pact with Nato". The Observer.
20. Kimball, Daryl. (August 2017). "The Conventional Armed Forces in Europe (CFE) Treaty and the Adapted CFE Treaty at a Glance".
21. Techau, Jan. (2 September 2015). "The Politics of 2 Percent: NATO and the Security Vacuum in Europe".
22. (2021). "NATO's Expansion After the Cold War: Geopolitics and Impacts for International Security". Springer Nature.
23. (12 December 2017). "Declassified documents show security assurances against NATO expansion to Soviet leaders from Baker, Bush, Genscher, Kohl, Gates, Mitterrand, Thatcher, Hurd, Major, and Woerner". National Security Archive.
24. Wiegrefe, Klaus. (18 February 2022). "Neuer Aktenfund von 1991 stützt russischen Vorwurf". [[Der Spiegel]].
25. Baker, Peter. (9 January 2022). "In Ukraine Conflict, Putin Relies on a Promise That Ultimately Wasn't". [[The New York Times]].
26. (6 February 2019). "NATO Announces Special 70th Anniversary Summit In London In December".
27. Jing Ke. (2008). "Did the US Media Reflect the Reality of the Kosovo War in an Objective Manner? A Case Study of The Washington Post and The Washington Times".
28. NATO. "Relations with the Republic of North Macedonia (Archived)".
29. (3 October 2001). "Invocation of Article 5 confirmed". North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
30. "Counter-piracy operations". North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
31. Stratton, Allegra. (17 June 2008). "Sarkozy military plan unveiled". The Guardian.
32. (11 November 2014). "Defence Planning Committee (DPC) (Archived)". NATO.
33. (4 March 2014). "Statement by the North Atlantic Council following meeting under article 4 of the Washington Treaty". NATO Newsroom.
34. (24 February 2022). "The consultation process and Article 4".
35. (2 September 2015). "The Politics of 2 Percent: NATO and the Security Vacuum in Europe". [[Carnegie Europe]].
36. (28 March 2022). "NATO's military presence in the east of the Alliance".
37. (11 February 2022). "U.S. sending 3,000 more troops to Poland amid fresh Ukraine invasion warnings".
38. (21 January 2022). "Spain sends warships to Black Sea, considers sending warplanes".
39. (9 February 2022). "Spain will send four fighter jets and 130 troops to Bulgaria".
40. (25 March 2022). "NATO, G7, EU leaders display unity, avoid confrontation with Russia".
41. Gonzalez, Oriana. (26 February 2022). "NATO Response Force deploys for first time".
42. (14 June 2022). "NATO BOOSTS FORCES IN EAST TO DETER RUSSIAN MENACE". Balkan Insight.
43. "Germany is building a big scary army". The Economist.
44. (2009). "NATO's Operations 1949–Present". NATO.
45. "NATO Handbook: Evolution of the Conflict". NATO.
46. link. (12 September 2009, accessed 25 April 2015.)
47. {{harvnb. Zenko. 2010
48. Tice, Jim. (22 February 2009). "Thousands more now eligible for NATO Medal". [[Army Times]].
49. Crossette, Barbara. (24 September 1998). "Security Council tells Serbs to stop Kosovo offensive". The New York Times.
50. (24 March 1999). "Nato to strike Yugoslavia". BBC News.
51. Thorpe, Nick. (24 March 2004). "UN Kosovo mission walks a tightrope". BBC News.
52. (19 December 2005). "The Kosovo refugee crisis".
53. (24 April 1999). "NATO reaffirms power to take action without UN approval". [[CNN]].
54. "Allied Command Atlantic". NATO.
55. (28 August 2000). "Kosovo Report Card". [[International Crisis Group]].
56. Helm, Toby. (27 September 2001). "Macedonia mission a success, says Nato". The Daily Telegraph.
57. (10 July 2023). "NATO's role in Kosovo". NATO.
58. (2021). "Creating common sense: Getting NATO to Afghanistan". Journal of Transatlantic Studies.
59. (2 October 2001). "NATO Update: Invocation of Article 5 confirmed". NATO.
60. (11 August 2003). "NATO takes historic step into Afghanistan".
61. "UNSC Resolution 1510, October 13, 2003".
62. "ISAF Chronology". NATO.
63. Morales, Alex. (5 October 2006). "NATO Takes Control of East Afghanistan From U.S.-Led Coalition". [[Bloomberg L.P.]].
64. "La France et l'OTAN". Le Monde.
65. (21 May 2012). "NATO sets "irreversible" but risky course to end Afghan war". Reuters.
66. Rasmussen, Sune Engel. (28 December 2014). "Nato ends combat operations in Afghanistan". The Guardian.
67. (14 April 2021). "NATO to Cut Forces in Afghanistan, Match US Withdrawal". [[VOA News]].
68. Graham-Harrison, Emma. (13 July 2021). "Afghanistan stunned by scale and speed of security forces' collapse". The Guardian.
69. (16 August 2021). "Taliban surge in Afghanistan: EU and NATO in state of shock". Deutsche Welle.
70. (16 August 2021). "Afghanistan takeover sparks concern from NATO allies". Deutsche Welle.
71. (16 August 2021). "Migration fears complicate Europe's response to Afghanistan crisis". Politico.
72. "Official Website".
73. El Gamal, Rania. (17 December 2011). "NATO closes up training mission in Iraq". Reuters.
74. Croft, Adrian. (3 October 2012). "NATO demands halt to Syria aggression against Turkey". [[Reuters]].
75. (26 July 2015). "Turkey calls for rare NATO talks after attacks along Syrian border". CNN.
76. (30 September 2014). "Operation Allied Provider". [[Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe]].
77. "Operation Ocean Shield". NATO.
78. (October 2010). "2009 Operation Ocean Shield News Articles". NATO.
79. (12 July 2016). "Operation Ocean Shield purpose".
80. "Counter-piracy operations (2008-2016)".
81. (March 17, 2011). "Security Council Approves 'No-Fly Zone' over Libya, Authorizing 'All Necessary Measures' to Protect Civilians, by Vote of 10 in Favour with 5 Abstentions".
82. Anrig, Christian F.. (2011). "Allied Air Power over Libya: A Preliminary Assessment". [[Air & Space Power Journal]].
83. (22 March 2011). "Statement by the NATO Secretary General on Libya arms embargo". NATO.
84. (23 March 2011). "Press briefing by NATO Spokesperson Oana Lungescu, Brigadier General Pierre St-Amand, Canadian Air Force and General Massimo Panizzi, spokesperson of the Chairman of the Military Committee". NATO.
85. (25 March 2011). "NATO reaches deal to take over Libya operation; allied planes hit ground forces". Washington Post.
86. (24 March 2011). "NATO to police Libya no-fly zone".
87. O'Sullivan, Arieh. (31 March 2011). "UAE and Qatar pack an Arab punch in Libya operation". Jerusalem Post.
88. link. (12 August 2011 , Khaled al-Ramahi. ''Malaysia Star''. 9 June 2011. Retrieved 9 June 2011)
89. link. (10 October 2017 , ''Wall Street Journal''. Retrieved 9 June 2011)
90. [https://latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-libya-nato-20110609,0,6023643.story "Gates Calls on NATO Allies to Do More in Libya"] {{Webarchive. link. (14 March 2022 , Jim Garamone. US Department of Defense. 8 June 2011. Retrieved 9 June 2011)
91. Cloud, David S. (9 June 2011). [https://latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-libya-nato-20110609,0,6023643.story "Gates calls for more NATO allies to join Libya air campaign"] {{Webarchive. link. (14 March 2022 , ''Los Angeles Times''. Retrieved 9 June 2011)
92. link. (5 November 2013 , ''Washington Times''. Retrieved 29 January 2013)
93. Birnbaum, Michael (10 June 2011). [https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/gates-rebukes-european-allies-in-farewell-speech/2011/06/10/AG9tKeOH_story.html "Gates rebukes European allies in farewell speech"] {{Webarchive. link. (25 August 2017 , ''Washington Post''. Retrieved 10 June 2011.)
94. Amland, Bjoern H. (10 June 2011). [https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/sdut-norway-to-quit-libya-operation-by-august-2011jun10-story.html "Norway to quit Libya operation by August"] {{Webarchive. link. (11 April 2020 , Associated Press.)
95. [http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20110610/world/Danish-planes-running-out-of-bombs.369868 "Danish planes running out of bombs"] {{Webarchive. link. (12 June 2011 , ''Times of Malta''. 10 June 2011. Retrieved 11 June 2011)
96. [https://archive.today/20120724041541/http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=6770530&c=EUR&s=AIR "Danish Planes in Libya Running Out of Bombs: Report"], ''Defense News''. 9 June 2011. Retrieved 11 June 2011
97. [https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8573849/Navy-chief-Britain-cannot-keep-up-its-role-in-Libya-air-war-due-to-cuts.html "Navy chief: Britain cannot keep up its role in Libya air war due to cuts"] {{Webarchive. link. (13 September 2018 , James Kirkup. ''The Telegraph''. 13 June 2011. Retrieved 29 January 2013)
98. (11 October 2011). "NATO: Ongoing resistance by pro-Gadhafi forces in Libya is 'surprising'". The Washington Post.
99. (21 October 2011). "NATO strategy in Libya may not work elsewhere". USA Today.
100. Tharoor, Ishaan. (16 May 2012). "How Many Innocent Civilians Did NATO Kill in Libya?".
101. Croft, Adrian. "NATO to advise Libya on strengthening security forces". Reuters.
102. [http://www.todayszaman.com/diplomacy_pm-turkey-may-invoke-natos-article-5-over-syrian-border-fire_277185.html todayszaman.com: "PM: Turkey may invoke NATO's Article 5 over Syrian border fire"] {{webarchive. link. (26 June 2015 , 11 April 2012)
103. [http://www.todayszaman.com/diplomacy_observers-say-natos-fifth-charter-comes-into-play-if-clashes-with-syria-get-worse_277187.html todayszaman.com: "Observers say NATO's fifth charter comes into play if clashes with Syria get worse"] {{webarchive. link. (26 June 2015 , 11 April 2012)
104. [http://www.todayszaman.com/diplomacy_nato-says-monitoring-tension-in-turkey-syria-border_277247.html todayszaman.com: "NATO says monitoring tension in Turkey-Syria border"] {{webarchive. link. (26 June 2015 , 12 April 2012)
105. (24 February 2022). "The consultation process and Article 4".
106. [https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/turkey/11764178/Turkey-calls-for-Nato-meeting-to-discuss-Isil-and-PKK.html telegraph.co.uk: "Turkey calls for emergency Nato meeting to discuss Isil and PKK"] {{Webarchive. link. (16 October 2022 , 26 July 2015)
107. Ford, Dana. (27 July 2015). "Turkey calls for rare NATO talks after attacks along Syrian border". CNN.
108. (27 July 2015). "Turkey and U.S. Plan to Create Syria 'Safe Zone' Free of ISIS".
109. (28 July 2015). "Statement by the North Atlantic Council following meeting under Article 4 of the Washington Treaty".
110. (28 February 2020). "Russia denies involvement in airstrikes on Turkish troops in Idlib".
111. (29 February 2020). "Greece 'vetoes NATO statement' on support for Turkey amid Syria escalation".
112. (September 12, 2025). "NATO launches 'Eastern Sentry' operation in response to Russian drone incursions". CNN.
113. NATO. (4 April 1949). "The North Atlantic Treaty".
114. (23 February 2013). "The area of responsibility". NATO.
115. (11 April 2011). "Washington Treaty". NATO.
116. (12 July 2023). "How does a country join NATO?".
117. "Denmark and NATO – 1949".
118. (29 April 2019). "Why the concept of Gaullo-Mitterrandism is still relevant".
119. NATO. "Member countries".
120. NATO. "Relations with the Republic of North Macedonia (Archived)".
121. (4 April 2023). "NATO's border with Russia doubles as Finland joins". BBC News.
122. (7 March 2024). "Notification Reference No. 2024-008".
123. "NATO Topics: Individual Partnership Action Plans". NATO.
124. Vladimir V. Putin, [http://www.en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/22952 "France 3 Interview, 7 May 2005"]. President of Russia.
125. (15 July 2010). "Yanukovych signs law declaring Ukraine's non-aligned status". [[Kyiv Post]].
126. (23 December 2014). "Ukraine drops non-aligned status in swipe at Moscow". [[France 24]].
127. (7 February 2019). "Ukraine's parliament backs changes to Constitution confirming Ukraine's path toward EU, NATO". [[Ukrainian Independent Information Agency]].
128. "The law amending the Constitution on the course of accession to the EU and NATO has entered into force {{!}} European integration portal".
129. "Brussels Summit Communiqué issued by the Heads of State and Government participating in the meeting of the North Atlantic Council in Brussels 14 June 2021".
130. (30 November 2021). "Russia will act if Nato countries cross Ukraine 'red lines', Putin says". The Guardian.
131. (1 December 2021). "NATO Pushes Back Against Russian President Putin's 'Red Lines' Over Ukraine". The Drive.
132. (30 November 2021). "Putin warns Russia will act if NATO crosses its red lines in Ukraine". Reuters.
133. (17 December 2021). "Russia demands NATO roll back from East Europe and stay out of Ukraine". [[Reuters]].
134. (1 December 2021). "NATO chief: "Russia has no right to establish a sphere of influence"". Axios.
135. (10 December 2021). "Is Russia preparing to invade Ukraine? And other questions". BBC News.
136. (26 January 2022). "US offers no concessions in response to Russia on Ukraine". [[Associated Press]].
137. (30 September 2022). "Ukraine applies for Nato membership after Russia annexes territory". [[The Guardian]].
138. George J, Teigen JM. (2008). "NATO Enlargement and Institution Building: Military Personnel Policy Challenges in the Post-Soviet Context". European Security.
139. Cathcourt, Will. (27 March 2014). "Obama Tells Georgia to Forget About NATO After Encouraging It to Join". [[The Daily Beast]].
140. (26 November 2009). "NATO's Eastward Expansion: Did the West Break Its Promise to Moscow?". [[Spiegel Online]].
141. [http://www.levada.ru/en/2016/11/04/levada-center_chicago_council/ Levada-Center and Chicago Council on Global Affairs about Russian-American relations] {{Webarchive. link. (19 August 2017 . Levada-Center. 4 November 2016.)
142. (16 August 2017). "Pew survey: Russia disliked around world; most in Poland, Turkey see Kremlin as major threat". Kyiv Post.
143. "NATO summit: Poland pins its hopes on the USA". Deutsche Welle.
144. (10 February 2017). "Most NATO Members in Eastern Europe See It as Protection". Gallup.
145. Epstein, Rachel. (2006). "Nato Enlargement and the Spread of Democracy: Evidence and Expectations". Security Studies.
146. (4 February 2022). "China joins Russia in opposing Nato expansion". BBC News.
147. (15 February 2012). "NATO Common Funds Burdensharing: Background and Current Issues". [[Congressional Research Service]].
148. (13 February 2024). "Fact-checking Trump comments on 'delinquent' NATO countries". [[Roll Call]].
149. (14 February 2024). "Funding NATO". [[North Atlantic Treaty Organization]].
150. (13 February 2024). "What did Trump say about NATO funding and what is Article 5?". [[Reuters]].
151. Sabbagh, Dan. (14 February 2024). "Nato chief rebukes Donald Trump and announces record defence spending". [[The Guardian]].
152. (17 June 2024). "Secretary General in Washington: NATO makes America stronger". NATO.
153. (17 June 2024). "A record number of NATO allies are hitting their defense spending target during war in Ukraine". Associated Press.
154. "NATO Spending by Country 2025".
155. (9 July 2007). "Cooperative Archer military exercise begins in Georgia".
156. "Partnership for Peace". NATO.
157. "Nato and Belarus – partnership, past tensions and future possibilities". [[Foreign Policy and Security Research Center]].
158. "NATO Topics: The Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council". NATO.
159. "Declaration by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan". NATO.
160. Boxhoorn, Bram. (21 September 2005). "Broad Support for NATO in the Netherlands". ATA Education.
161. Howorth, Jolyon. (2019). "Strategic Autonomy and EU-NATO Cooperation: A Win-Win Approach". L'Europe en Formation.
162. (7 June 2016). "Official Journal of the European Union".
163. (6 March 2009). "NATO Partner countries". NATO.
164. (5 June 2018). "Qatar eyes full NATO membership: Defense minister". The Peninsula.
165. (6 June 2018). "Nato rejects Qatar membership ambition". Dhaka Tribune.
166. (16 January 2018). "Qatar signs security agreement with NATO". NATO.
167. "NATO Topics:NATO's relations with Contact Countries".
168. (September 2010). "NATO PARTNERSHIPS: DOD Needs to Assess U.S. Assistance in Response to Changes to the Partnership for Peace Program". [[United States Government Accountability Office]].
169. (2 April 2012). "Partners". NATO.
170. (2025-05-12). "Topic: NATO's partnerships".
171. Mair, John. (7 August 2019). "NATO needs to address China's rise, says Stoltenberg". Reuters.
172. (19 May 2017). "Relations with Colombia". nato.int.
173. (26 May 2018). "Colombia to be NATO's first Latin American global partner".
174. (5 July 2016). "Topic: Consensus decision-making at NATO".
175. Piehler, G. Kurt. (24 July 2013). "Encyclopedia of Military Science". SAGE Publications.
176. (30 June 2023). "NATO Parliamentary Assembly in brief".
177. "NATO homepage".
178. (10 August 2010). "NATO Headquarters". NATO.
179. Small, Melvin. (1 June 1998). "The Atlantic Council—The Early Years". NATO.
180. (7 April 2016). "Atlantic Treaty Association and Youth Atlantic Treaty Association". NATO.
181. (31 March 2023). "Chair of the Military Committee".
182. (17 June 2008). "France to rejoin NATO command". CNN.
183. Fuller, Thomas. (18 February 2003). "Reaching accord, EU warns Saddam of his 'last chance'". International Herald Tribune.
184. "About us". [[Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe]].
185. (26 November 2012). "The Rapid Deployable Corps". NATO.
186. "Who We Are". [[Allied Command Transformation]].
187. (July 2014). "Legal Authority of NATO Commanders". NATO Legal Gazette.
188. (4 September 2007). "Gen Sir Mike Jackson: My clash with Nato chief". Telegraph Media Group Limited.