From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
Language isolate
Language that has no demonstrable genetic relationship with other languages
Language that has no demonstrable genetic relationship with other languages

A language isolate, or an isolated language, is a language that has no demonstrable genetic relationship with any other languages. Basque in Europe, Ainu and Burushaski in Asia, Sandawe in Africa, Haida and Zuni in North America, Kanoê and Trumai in South America, and Tiwi in Oceania are all examples of such languages. The exact number of language isolates is yet unknown due to insufficient data on several languages.
One explanation for the existence of language isolates is that they might be the last remaining member of a larger language family. Such languages might have had relatives in the past that have since disappeared without being documented, leaving them an orphaned language. One example is the Ket language spoken in central Siberia, which belongs to the wider Yeniseian language family; had it been discovered in recent times independently from its now extinct relatives, such as Yugh and Kott, it would have been classified as an isolate. Another explanation for language isolates is that they arose independently in isolation and thus do not share a common linguistic genesis with any other language but themselves. This explanation mostly applies to sign languages that have developed independently of other spoken or signed languages.
Some languages once seen as isolates may be reclassified as small families if some of their dialects are judged to be sufficiently different from the standard to be seen as different languages. Examples include Japanese and Georgian: Japanese is now part of the Japonic language family with the Ryukyuan languages, and Georgian is the main language in the Kartvelian language family. There is a difference between language isolates and unclassified languages, but they can be difficult to differentiate when it comes to classifying extinct languages. If such efforts eventually do prove fruitful, a language previously considered an isolate may no longer be considered one, as happened with the Yanyuwa language of northern Australia, which has been placed in the Pama–Nyungan family. Since linguists do not always agree on whether a genetic relationship has been demonstrated, it is often disputed whether a language is an isolate.
Genetic relationships
Main article: Genetic relationship (linguistics)
A genetic relationship is when two different languages are descended from a common ancestral language. This is what makes up a language family, which is a set of languages for which sufficient evidence exists to demonstrate that they descend from a single ancestral language and are therefore genetically related. For example, English is related to other Indo-European languages and Mandarin Chinese is related to other Sino-Tibetan languages. By this criterion, each language isolate constitutes a family of its own.
This is not to be confused with family-level isolates, which are not language isolates themselves but form a primary branch of a language family, such as Armenian within Indo-European and Paiwan within Austronesian.
Extinct isolates
Caution is required when speaking of extinct languages as language isolates. Despite their great age, Sumerian and Elamite can be safely classified as isolates, as the languages are well enough documented that, if modern relatives existed, they would be recognizably related. A language thought to be an isolate may turn out to be related to other languages once enough material is recovered, but this is unlikely for extinct languages whose written records have not been preserved.
Many extinct languages are very poorly attested, which may lead to them being considered unclassified languages instead of language isolates. This occurs when linguists do not have enough information on a language to classify it as either a language isolate or as a part of another language family.
Isolates v. unclassified languages
Unclassified languages are different from language isolates in that they have no demonstrable genetic relationships to other languages due to a lack of sufficient data. In order to be considered a language isolate, a language needs to have sufficient data for comparisons with other languages through methods of historical-comparative linguistics to show that it does not have any genetic relationships.
Many extinct and living languages today are very poorly attested, and the fact that they cannot be linked to other languages may be a reflection of linguists' poor knowledge of them. Hattic, Gutian, and Kassite are all considered unclassified languages, but their status is disputed by a minority of linguists. Many extinct languages of the Americas such as Cayuse and Majena may likewise have been isolates. Several unclassified languages could also be language isolates, but linguists cannot be sure of this without sufficient evidence.
Sign language isolates
A number of sign languages have arisen independently, without any ancestral language, and thus are language isolates. These include Nicaraguan Sign Language, a well-documented case of what has happened in schools for the deaf in many countries. In Tanzania, for example, there are seven schools for the deaf, each with its own sign language with no connection to any other language. Sign languages have also developed outside schools, in communities with high incidences of deafness, such as Kata Kolok in Bali, and half a dozen sign languages of the hill tribes in Thailand including the Ban Khor Sign Language.
These and more are all presumed isolates or small local families, because many deaf communities are made up of people whose hearing parents do not use sign language, and have manifestly, as shown by the language itself, not borrowed their sign language from other deaf communities during the recorded history of these languages.
Reclassification
Some languages once seen as isolates may be reclassified as small families because their genetic relationship to other languages has been established. This happened with Japanese and Ryukyuan languages, Korean and Koreanic languages, Atakapa and Akokisa languages, Tol and Jicaque of El Palmar languages, and the Xincan Guatemala language family in which linguists have grouped the Chiquimulilla, Guazacapán, Jumaytepeque, and Yupiltepeque languages.
List of language isolates by continent
Below is a list of known language isolates, arranged by continent, along with notes on possible relations to other languages or language families.
The status column indicates the degree of endangerment of the language, according to the definitions of the UNESCO Atlas of the World's Languages in Danger. "Vibrant" languages are those in full use by speakers of every generation, with consistent native acquisition by children. "Vulnerable" languages have a similarly wide base of native speakers, but a restricted use and the long-term risk of language shift. "Endangered" languages are either acquired irregularly or spoken only by older generations. "Moribund" languages have only a few remaining native speakers, with no new acquisition, highly restricted use, and near-universal multilingualism. "Extinct" languages have no native speakers, but are sufficiently documented to be classified as isolates.
Africa
With few exceptions, all of Africa's languages have been gathered into four major phyla: Afroasiatic, Niger–Congo, Nilo-Saharan and Khoisan. However, the genetic unity of some language families, like Nilo-Saharan, is questionable, and so there may be many more language families and isolates than currently accepted. Data for several African languages, like Kwisi, are not sufficient for classification. In addition, Jalaa, Shabo, Laal, Kujargé, and a few other languages within Nilo-Saharan and Afroasiatic-speaking areas may turn out to be isolates upon further investigation. Defaka and Ega are highly divergent languages located within Niger–Congo-speaking areas, and may also possibly be language isolates.
| Language | Speakers | Status | Countries | Comments | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bangime | 3,500 | Vibrant | Mali | Spoken in the Bandiagara Escarpment. Used as an anti-language. | |||||||||||
| Bayot | 35,000 | Senegal, Guinea-Bissau | Basic vocabulary shows no relation to other languages. | ||||||||||||
| Gule | Extinct | Sudan | editor-last1= Hammarström | editor-first1 = Harald | editor-last2 = Forke | editor-first2 = Robert | editor-last3 = Haspelmath | editor-first3 = Martin | editor-last4 = Bank | editor-first4 = Sebastian | year = 2020 | title = Gule | work = Glottolog 4.3 | url = https://glottolog.org/resource/languoid/id/gule1241}} | |
| Hadza | 1,000 | Vulnerable | Tanzania | last1=Witzlack-Makarevich | first1=Alena | last2=Nakagawa | first2=Hirosi | editor1-last=Ekkehard-Wolff | editor1-first=H. | title=The Cambridge Handbook of African Linguistics | date=2019 | publisher=CUP | pages=382–416 | chapter=Linguistic Features and Typologies in Languages Commonly Referred to as 'Khoisan'}} Language use is vigorous, though there are fewer than 1,000 speakers. | |
| Jalaa | Extinct | Nigeria | Strongly influenced by Dikaka, but most vocabulary is very unusual. | ||||||||||||
| Laal | 750 | Moribund | Chad | Spoken in three villages along the Chari River in Moyen-Chari Region. Poorly known. Also known as Gori. Possibly a distinct branch of Niger–Congo, Chadic of the Afroasiatic languages, or mixed. | |||||||||||
| Mpra | Extinct | Ghana | It is known only from a 70-word list given in a 1931 article. Blench (2007) considers it to be a possible language isolate. | ||||||||||||
| Ongota | 12 | Moribund | Ethiopia | Likely isolated. | |||||||||||
| Sandawe | 60,000 | Vibrant | Tanzania | Spoken in the northwest of Dodoma Region. Tentatively linked to the Khoe languages. | |||||||||||
| Shabo | 400 | Endangered | Ethiopia | Spoken in Anderaccha, Gecha, and Kaabo of the Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples' Region. Linked to the Gumuz and Koman families in the proposed Komuz branch of the Nilo-Saharan languages. | |||||||||||
| Siamou | 40,000 | Vibrant | Burkina Faso, Mali, Ivory Coast | Traditionally classified as Kru. Due to lack of evidence or any resemblance is classified now as an isolate. |
Asia
| Language | Speakers | Status | Countries | Comments | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ainu | 25,000 | Endangered | Japan | Spoken on the island of Hokkaido in Japan. Sometimes hypothesized to be related to Korean and Japanese, while at other times proposed to be a branch of Altaic. | |
| Bugun | 900 | Endangered | India | url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130526230734/http://www.rogerblench.info/Language/South%20Asia/NEI/General/Lingres/Declassifying%20Arunachal.pdf | date=2013-05-26 }} |
| Burushaski | 130,000 | Vulnerable | Pakistan, India | Spoken in the Yasin Valley and Hunza Valley of Gilgit-Baltistan and Hari Parbat of Jammu and Kashmir. Linked to Caucasian languages, Indo-European, and Na-Dene languages in various proposals. | |
| Elamite | Extinct | Iran | Formerly spoken in Elam, along the northeast coast of the Persian Gulf. Attested from around 2800 BC to 300 BC. Some propose a relationship to the Dravidian languages (see Elamo-Dravidian), but this is not well-supported. | ||
| Hruso | 3,000 | Vulnerable | India | Possible language isolate spoken by the Hruso people of Arunachal Pradesh in India. | |
| Kusunda | 23 | Moribund | Nepal | Spoken in Gandaki Province. The recent discovery of a few speakers shows that it is not demonstrably related to anything else. | |
| Miju | 18,000 | Endangered | India | Possible language isolate spoken by the Miju Mishmi of Arunachal Pradesh in India. | |
| Nihali | 2,500 | Spoken in northern Maharashtra along the Tapti River. Strong lexical Munda influence from Korku, as well as Dravidian and Indo-Aryan languages. Used as anti-language by speakers. | |||
| Nivkh | 200 | Moribund | Russia | 978-3-86288-687-6}} Has been linked to Chukotko-Kamchatkan languages. | |
| 'Ole | 1 | Moribund | Bhutan | ʼOle, also called ʼOlekha or Black Mountain Monpa, is a moribund, possibly Sino-Tibetan language spoken natively by 1 person in the Black Mountains of Wangdue Phodrang and Trongsa Districts in western Bhutan. The term ʼOle refers to a clan of speakers. | |
| Puroik | 20,000 | Vulnerable | India, China | Possible language isolate spoken by the Puroik people of Arunachal Pradesh in India and of Lhünzê County, Tibet, in China. | |
| Sumerian | Extinct | Iraq | Spoken in Mesopotamia until around 1800 BC, but used as a classical language until 100 AD. Long-extinct, but well-attested language of ancient Sumer. | ||
| Tambora | Indonesia | Poorly documented, extinct since the 1815 eruption of Mount Tambora, basic vocabulary points towards it being an isolate. | |||
| Vedda | 300 | Endangered | Sri Lanka | Highly influenced by Sinhala and Tamil to the extent some linguists have classed it as a creole language. |
Oceania
Current research considers that the "Papuasphere" centered in New Guinea includes as many as 37 isolates. (The more is known about these languages in the future, the more likely it is for these languages to be later assigned to a known language family.) To these, one must add several isolates found among non-Pama-Nyungan languages of Australia:
| Language | Speakers | Status | Countries | Comments | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abinomn | 300 | Vibrant | Indonesia | Spoken in the far north of New Guinea. Also known as Bas or Foia. Language is considered safe by UNESCO but endangered by Ethnologue. | ||||||||||||
| Abun | 3,000 | Spoken in the northern area of Bird's Head Peninsula located in the province of Southwest Papua. Linked to West Papuan languages but Palmer (2018), Ethnologue, and Glottolog consider it an isolate. | ||||||||||||||
| Anêm | 800 | Papua New Guinea | url=https://www.ethnologue.com/country/PG/languages | title=Papua New Guinea languages | work=Ethnologue: Languages of the World | edition=22nd | editor1-last=Eberhard | editor1-first=David M. | editor2-last=Simons | editor2-first=Gary F. | editor3-last=Fennig | editor3-first=Charles D. | date=2019 | location=Dallas | publisher=SIL International}} Perhaps related to Yélî Dnye and Ata. | |
| Ata | 2,000 | Spoken in the central highlands of New Britain. Also known as Wasi. Perhaps related to Yélî Dnye and Anem. | ||||||||||||||
| Burmeso | 250 | Indonesia | Spoken in Mamberamo Raya Regency, Papua Province. Linked to West Papuan languages but Stephen Wurm and William A. Foley consider it an isolate. | |||||||||||||
| Busa | 370 | Papua New Guinea | Spoken in Sandaun Province, northwestern Papua New Guinea. Added to Senu River. | |||||||||||||
| Giimbiyu | Extinct | Australia | Arnhem Land language family]]. | |||||||||||||
| Isirawa | 1,800 | Vibrant | Papua New Guinea | Whilst classed as a Kwerbic language, it only shares 20% of its vocabulary and is considered by some linguists to be an isolate. | ||||||||||||
| Kol | 4,000 | Spoken in the northeastern part of New Britain. Possibly related to the poorly known Sulka, or the Baining languages, suggested as part of the East Papuan languages. | ||||||||||||||
| Kuot | 1,500 | Spoken on New Ireland. Also known as Panaras. Suggested to form part of the East Papuan family. | ||||||||||||||
| Lavukaleve | 1,700 | Vulnerable | Solomon Islands | Classified as an isolate by Endangered Languages Project; historically classified as a Central Solomon language, but little evidence was found of a relationship by Muller. | ||||||||||||
| Malak-Malak | 10 | Moribund | Australia | Spoken in northern Australia. Often considered part of one Northern Daly family together with Tyeraity. Used to be considered genetically related to the Wagaydyic languages, but nowadays they are considered genetically distinct. | ||||||||||||
| Marrgu | Extinct | Marrgu had been assumed to be an Iwaidjan language like its neighbours. However, Evans (2006) has produced evidence that it was a language isolate, with possible connection to the extinct and poorly attested Wurrugu. | ||||||||||||||
| Mawes | Indonesia | Likely isolate. | ||||||||||||||
| Maybrat | 25,000 | Vibrant | Spoken in the central area of the Bird's Head Peninsula located in the province of Southwest Papua. Sometimes linked to West Papuan languages but others consider it an isolate. | |||||||||||||
| Molof | 230 | Vulnerable | url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201125143227/https://www.langlxmelanesia.com/wichmann313-386.pdf | date=2020-11-25 }}. In: Hammarström, Harald and Wilco van den Heuvel (eds.), History, contact and classification of Papuan languages (Language and Linguistics in Melanesia, Special Issue 2012), 313-386. Port Moresby: Linguistic Society of Papua New Guinea. | ||||||||||||
| Mpur | 5,000 | Vibrant | Spoken in the Mpur and Amberbaken Districts, Tambrauw Regency on the north coast of the Bird's Head Peninsula. | |||||||||||||
| Murrinh-patha | 2,100 | Australia | Spoken on the eastern coast of Joseph Bonaparte Gulf in the Top End. The proposed linkage to Ngan'gityemerri in one Southern Daly family is generally accepted to be valid. | |||||||||||||
| Ngan'gityemerri | 26 | Moribund | Spoken in the Top End along the Daly River. The proposed linkage to Murrinh-patha in one Southern Daly family is generally accepted to be valid. | |||||||||||||
| Porome | 1,200 | Vibrant | Papua New Guinea | Spoken in 6 villages in West Kikori Rural LLG and East Kikori Rural LLG of Gulf Province, near the Aird Hills and Kikori River tributaries. | ||||||||||||
| Pyu | 250 | Vulnerable | Spoken in Green River Rural LLG in Sandaun Province, near the Indonesian border. Linked to neighboring Left May and Amto-Musan in a proposed Arai-Samaia family. | |||||||||||||
| Sulka | 2,500 | Vibrant | Spoken across the eastern end of New Britain. Suggested to form part of the East Papuan family. | |||||||||||||
| Tause | 500 | Vulnerable | Indonesia | Was classified to encourage research as a Lakes Plain language, but there has been little evidence so has been classed as an isolate. | ||||||||||||
| Tayap | Moribund | Papua New Guinea | Formerly spoken in the village of Gapun. Links to Lower Sepik languages and Torricelli languages have been explored, but the general consensus among linguists is that it is an isolate unrelated to surrounding languages. | |||||||||||||
| Tiwi | 2,100 | Vulnerable | Australia | Spoken in the Tiwi Islands in the Timor Sea. Traditionally Tiwi is polysynthetic, but the Tiwi spoken by younger generations is not. | ||||||||||||
| Touo | 1,900 | Solomon Islands | Classified as an isolate by Glottolog. | |||||||||||||
| Umbugarla | Extinct | Australia | Possibly a language isolate. Ngomburr likely a dialect. | |||||||||||||
| Usku | 20 ~ 160 | Moribund | Indonesia | Foley (2018) classifies it as a language isolate. | ||||||||||||
| Wagiman | 11 | Australia | Spoken in the southern part of the Top End. May be distantly related to the Yangmanic languages, which might in turn be a member of the Macro-Gunwinyguan family, but neither link has been demonstrated. | |||||||||||||
| Wardaman | 50 | Spoken in the southern part of the Top End. The extinct and poorly attested Dagoman and Yangman dialects are sometimes treated as separate languages, forming a Yangmanic family, to which Wagiman may be distantly related. Possibly a member of the Macro-Gunwinyguan family, but this has yet to be demonstrated. | ||||||||||||||
| Yele | 5,000 | Vibrant | Papua New Guinea | Stebbins et al. (2018) classifies Yélî Dnye as an isolate. They explain similarities with Austronesian as being due to contact and diffusion. |
Europe
| Language | Speakers | Status | Countries | Comments | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basque | url=https://basquetribune.com/the-basque-language-gains-speakers-but-no-surge-in-usage/ | title=The Basque Language Gains Speakers, but No Surge in Usage – Basque Tribune }} 434,000 passive speakers | Vulnerable | Spain, France | Natively known as Euskara, the Basque language is found in the historical region of the Basque Country between France and Spain. It has no known living relatives, although Aquitanian is commonly regarded as related to or a direct ancestor of Basque. Some linguists have claimed similarities with various languages of the Caucasus that are indicative of a relationship, while others have proposed a relation to Iberian and to the hypothetical Dené–Caucasian languages. |
North America
| Language | Speakers | Status | Countries | Comments | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alsea | Extinct | United States | Poorly attested. Spoken along the central coast of Oregon until the early 1950s. Sometimes regarded as two separate languages. Often included in the Penutian hypothesis in a Coast Oregon Penutian branch. | ||||||||||||||
| Atakapa | Spoken on the Gulf coast of eastern Texas and southwestern Louisiana until the early 1900s. Often linked to Muskogean in a Gulf hypothesis. | ||||||||||||||||
| Cayuse | Spoken in Oregon until the 1930s. Classified as a language isolate per Campbell (2024). | ||||||||||||||||
| Chimariko | Spoken in northern California until the 1950s. Part of the Hokan hypothesis. | ||||||||||||||||
| Chitimacha | last1=Brown | first1=Cecil | last2=Wichmann | first2=Soren | last3=Beck | first3=Dacid | title=Chitimacha: a Mesoamerican Language Spoken in the Lower Mississippi Valley | journal=International Journal of American Linguistics | date=2014 | volume=80 | issue=4 | pages=426–484 | doi=10.1086/677911 | s2cid=145538166 }} Possibly in the Totozoquean family of Mesoamerica. | |||
| Coahuilteco | United States, Mexico | Spoken in southern Texas and northeastern Mexico until the 1700s. Part of the Pakawan hypothesis, has been linked to the hypothesised Hokan languages in a larger group. | |||||||||||||||
| Cotoname | Spoken in extreme southern Texas and northeastern Mexico until . Part of the Pakawan hypothesis, has been linked to the hypothesised Hokan languages in a larger group. | ||||||||||||||||
| Cuitlatec | Mexico | last1=Escalante Hernández | first1=Robert | title=El Cuitlateco | date=1982 | publisher=Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia | location=México, D.F.}} Has been proposed to be part of Macro-Chibchan and Uto-Aztecan. | ||||||||||
| Esselen | United States | Poorly known. Spoken in the Big Sur region of California until the early 1800s. Part of the Hokan hypothesis. | |||||||||||||||
| Haida | 13 | Moribund | Canada, United States | Spoken in the Haida Gwaii archipelago off the northwest coast of British Columbia, and the southern islands of the Alexander Archipelago in southeastern Alaska. Some proposals connect it to the Na-Dené languages, but these have fallen into disfavor. | |||||||||||||
| Huave | 20,000 | Vulnerable | Mexico | last1=Campbell | first1=Lyle | title=American Indian Languages – The Historical Linguistics of Native America | date=1997 | publisher=Oxford Studies in Anthropological Linguistics, Oxford University Press. | location=Oxford }} | ||||||||
| Karuk | 12 | Moribund | United States | Spoken along the Klamath River in northwestern California. Part of the Hokan hypothesis, but little evidence for this. | |||||||||||||
| Keres | 13,200 | Endangered | Spoken in several pueblos throughout New Mexico, including Cochiti and Acoma Pueblos. Has two main dialects: Eastern and Western. Sometimes those two dialects are separated into languages in a Keresan family. | ||||||||||||||
| Kutenai | 345 | Moribund | Canada, United States | Spoken in the Rockies of northeastern Idaho, northwestern Montana and southeastern British Columbia. Attempts have been made to place it in a Macro-Algic or Macro-Salishan family, but these have not gained significant support. | |||||||||||||
| Natchez | Extinct | United States | last=Kimball | first=Geoffry | chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nd5o9juMePEC&pg=PA385 | chapter=Natchez | title=Native Languages of the Southeastern United States | editor=Janine Scancarelli | editor2=Heather Kay Hardy | publisher=University of Nebraska Press | year=2005 | pages=385–453 | isbn=978-0-8032-4235-7}} Often linked to Muskogean in a Gulf hypothesis. Attempts at revival have produced six people with some fluency.{{Cite news | last = Smith | |||
| Purépecha | 142,500 | Endangered | Mexico | Spoken in the north of Michoacán state. Language of the ancient Tarascan kingdom. Sometimes regarded as two languages. | |||||||||||||
| Salinan | Extinct | United States | Spoken along the south-central coast of California. Part of the Hokan hypothesis. | ||||||||||||||
| Seri | 720 | Vulnerable | Mexico | Spoken along the coast of the Gulf of California, in the southwest of Sonora state. Part of the Hokan hypothesis. | |||||||||||||
| Siuslaw | Extinct | United States | Spoken on the southwest coast of Oregon until 1960. Likely related to Alsea, Coosan languages, or possibly the Wintuan languages. Part of the Penutian hypothesis. | ||||||||||||||
| Takelma | last1=Kendall | first1=Daythall | title=The Takelma Verb: Towards Proto-Takelma-Kalapuyan | journal=International Journal of American Linguistics | date=1997 | volume=63 | issue=1 | pages=1–17 | doi=10.1086/466312 | jstor=1265863 | s2cid=144593968}} Part of the Penutian hypothesis. | ||||||
| Timucua | Well attested. Spoken in northern Florida and southern Georgia until the mid- to late 1700s. Briefly spoken in Cuba by a migrant community established in 1763. A connection with the poorly known Tawasa language has been suggested, but this may be a dialect. | ||||||||||||||||
| Tonkawa | Spoken in central and northern Texas until the early 1940s. | ||||||||||||||||
| Tunica | Spoken in western Mississippi, northeastern Louisiana, and southeastern Arkansas until 1948. | ||||||||||||||||
| Washo | 20 | Moribund | Spoken along the Truckee River in the Sierra Nevada of eastern California and northwestern Nevada. Part of the Hokan hypothesis. | ||||||||||||||
| Yana | Extinct | Well-attested. Spoken in northern California until 1916. Part of the Hokan hypothesis. | |||||||||||||||
| Yuchi | Spoken in Oklahoma, but formerly spoken in eastern Tennessee. A connection to the Siouan languages has been proposed. The last native speaker died in 2021, but there is an ongoing revitalization project that has trained a small number of L2s. | ||||||||||||||||
| Zuni | 9,600 | Vulnerable | Spoken in Zuni Pueblo in northwestern New Mexico. Links to Penutian and Keres have been proposed. |
South America
| Language | Speakers | Status | Countries | Comments | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aikanã | 150 | Endangered | Brazil | Spoken in the Amazon of eastern Rondônia. Links to Kanoê and Kwaza have been tentatively proposed. Arawakan has been suggested. | ||||||||||
| Andaqui | Extinct | Colombia | Spoken in the southern highlands of Colombia the 1970s. It has been linked to the Paezan or Barbacoan languages, but no connections have been demonstrated. Adelaar (2004) classifies it as a language isolate. | |||||||||||
| Andoque | 370 | Endangered | Colombia, Peru | Spoken on the upper reaches of the Japurá River. Extinct in Peru. Possibly Witotoan. | ||||||||||
| Arutani | 6 | Moribund | Brazil, Venezuela | Spoken along the Paragua River and Uraricaá River in the far southern area of Bolívar State, Venezuela and the far northern area of Roraima, Brazil. Part of the proposed Arutani–Sape language family but more likely to be an isolate. | ||||||||||
| Betoi | Extinct | Venezuela | Spoken in the Apure River basin near the Colombian border until the 18th century. Paezan has been suggested. | |||||||||||
| Candoshi-Shapra | 1,100 | Endangered | Peru | Spoken along the Chapuli, Huitoyacu, Pastaza, and Morona river valleys in southwestern Loreto. Has been linked to various language families, but no agreement exists on its classification. | ||||||||||
| Canichana | Extinct | Bolivia | Spoken in the Llanos de Moxos region of Beni Department until around 2000. Connections with various language families have been proposed, none widely accepted. | |||||||||||
| Cayuvava | 12 | Moribund | Spoken in the Amazon west of Mamore River, north of Santa Ana del Yacuma in the Beni Department. | |||||||||||
| Chimane | 5,300 | Vulnerable | Spoken along the Beni river in Beni Department. Also spelled Tsimané. Sometimes split into multiple languages in a Moséten family. Linked to the Chonan languages in a Moseten-Chonan hypothesis. | |||||||||||
| Chiquitano | 2,400 | Endangered | Bolivia, Brazil | Spoken in the eastern part of Santa Cruz department and the southwestern part of Mato Grosso state. Has been linked to the Macro-Jê family. | ||||||||||
| Chono | Extinct | Chile | Spoken in Chonos Archipelago and Chiloé Archipelago until 1875. Glottolog and Campbell (2024) characterize it as a language isolate. | |||||||||||
| Cofán | 1,500 | Endangered | Colombia, Ecuador | Spoken in northern Sucumbíos Province and southern Putumayo Department. Also called A'ingae. Sometimes classified as Chibchan, but the similarities appear to be due to borrowings. Seriously endangered in Colombia. | ||||||||||
| Fulniô | 1,000 | Moribund | Brazil | Spoken in the states of Paraíba, Pernambuco, Alagoas, Sergipe, and the northern part of Bahia. Divided into two dialects, Fulniô and Yatê. Sometimes classified as a Macro-Jê language. | ||||||||||
| Guachí | Extinct | Argentina | Formerly spoken in Argentina by the Guachí. Linkage has been proposed to the Mataco–Guaicuru language family, however Campbell (2012) classifies it as an isolate. | |||||||||||
| Guató | url=https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110419405/html | title=Amazonian Languages: Language Isolates. Volume I: Aikanã to Kandozi-Chapra | date=2023 | publisher=Walter de Gruyter | isbn=978-3-11-041940-5 | editor-last=Epps | editor-first=Patience | location=Berlin | doi=10.1515/9783110419405 | editor-last2=Michael | editor-first2=Lev}} | Moribund | Brazil | Spoken in the far south of Mato Grosso near the Bolivian border. Has been classified as Macro-Jê, but this is disputed. |
| Irantxe | 90 | Endangered | Spoken by the Irántxe and Mỹky peoples in the state of Mato Grosso in Brazil. Recent descriptions of the language analyze it as a language isolate. According to Arruda (2003), it "bears no similarity with other language families". | |||||||||||
| Itonama | 1 | Moribund | Bolivia | Spoken in the far-eastern part of Beni Department. A relationship to Paezan has been suggested. | ||||||||||
| Kamëntšá | 4,000 | Endangered | Colombia | Spoken in Sibundoy in the Putumayo Department. Also known as Camsa, Coche, Sibundoy, Kamentxa, Kamse, or Camëntsëá. | ||||||||||
| Kanoê | 3 | Moribund | Brazil | Spoken in southeastern Rondônia. Also known as Kapishana. Tentatively linked to Kwaza and Aikanã. Part of a Macro-Paesan proposal. | ||||||||||
| Kunza | Extinct | Chile | Spoken in areas near Salar de Atacama until the 1950s. Also known as Atacameño. Part of a Macro-Paesan proposal. | |||||||||||
| Kwaza | 25 | Moribund | Brazil | Spoken in eastern Rondônia. Connections have been proposed with Aikanã and Kanoê. | ||||||||||
| Leco | 20 | Bolivia | Spoken at the foot of the Andes in the department of La Paz. | |||||||||||
| Máku-Auari | Extinct | Brazil | Spoken on the Brazil–Venezuela border in Roraima until 2000. Also known as Máku or Maku. Likely language isolate. Has been linked to the Arutani–Sape and the Macro-Puinavean language families. | |||||||||||
| Mapuche | 260,000 | Vulnerable | Chile, Argentina | Spoken in areas of the far-southern Andes and in the Chiloé Archipelago. Also known as Mapudungun, Araucano or Araucanian. Variously part of Andean, Macro-Panoan, or Mataco–Guaicuru proposals. Sometimes Huilliche is treated as a separate language, reclassifying Mapuche into an Araucanian family. | ||||||||||
| Matanawi | Extinct | Brazil | Spoken on the Castanha River and Madeirinha River in Amazonas in Brazil until the middle of the 20th century. Has been linked to the Mura-Pirahã language. | |||||||||||
| Mochica | Peru | Spoken along the northwest coast of Peru and in an inland village until . Usually considered to be a language isolate, but has also been hypothesized as belonging to a wider Chimuan language family. | ||||||||||||
| Movima | 1,400 | Vulnerable | Bolivia | Spoken in the Llanos de Moxos, in the north of Beni Department. Affiliations with Canichana, Chibcha and Macro-Tucanoan have been proposed, none of these have been proven. | ||||||||||
| Munichi | Extinct | Peru | Spoken in the southern part of Loreto Region until the late 1990s. Possibly evolved either from a mixed language or a sister language to Proto-Arawak. | |||||||||||
| Mure | Bolivia | Formerly spoken in the Jesuit Missions of Moxos in Beni Department. Isolate according to Glottolog. | ||||||||||||
| Nasayuwe | 60,000 | Vulnerable | Colombia | Spoken in the northern part of Cauca Department. Also known as Páez. Several proposed relationships in the Paezan hypothesis but nothing conclusive. | ||||||||||
| Omurano | Extinct | Peru | Spoken near the Marañón River until 2006. Linkage to the Saparo–Yawan language family has been proposed. | |||||||||||
| Oti | Brazil | Spoken in São Paulo until the early 1900s. Macro-Jê has been suggested. | ||||||||||||
| Pankararú | Spoken between the Moxotó River and the Pajeú River in eastern Brazil after until the 1960s. Probably a language isolate. | |||||||||||||
| Payaguá | Argentina, Paraguay | Spoken in Argentina and Paraguay by the Payaguá until 1943. Linkage has been proposed to the Mataco–Guaicuru language family, however Campbell (2012) classifies it as an isolate. | ||||||||||||
| Pirahã | 380 | Vibrant | Brazil | Spoken along the Maici River in Amazonas, Brazil. The only living dialect of Mura language. | ||||||||||
| Puelche | Extinct | Argentina, Chile | Spoken in the Pampas region, last speaker died around 1960. Sometimes linked to Het, as part of the Chonan languages. Included in a proposed Macro-Jibaro family. | |||||||||||
| Puinave | 3,000 | Endangered | Colombia, Venezuela | Spoken in 32 communities along the banks of the Inírida River in Guainía Department, Colombia and in 10 communities along the Orinoco River, in the Colombia–Venezuela border region. Generally considered to be a language isolate, but sometimes linked to Macro-Puinavean language family along with other families and lesser attested languages. | ||||||||||
| Ramanos | Extinct | Bolivia | Spoken in Moxos Province in Bolivia until the 1790s. Isolate according to Glottolog. | |||||||||||
| Sapé | Venezuela | Spoken along the Paragua River and Karuna River in Venezuela until 2018. Also known as Kaliana or Caliana. Part of the proposed Arutani–Sape language family but more likely to be an isolate. | ||||||||||||
| Taruma | 3 | Moribund | Brazil, Guyana and Suriname | Originally spoken around the mouth of the Rio Negro river, now located in Maruranau village among the Wapishana. Kaufman (1990) proposed it to be distantly related to Katembri, but this relationship has not been repeated in recent surveys of South American languages by Campbell (2012), confirming that this language is an isolate. | ||||||||||
| Taushiro | 1 | Peru | Spoken in the northeastern area of the Loreto province. Linkage to the Saparo–Yawan language family has been proposed. | |||||||||||
| Tequiraca | Extinct | Spoken in the central part of Loreto until the 1950s. Also known as Auishiri. A connection with Canichana has been proposed by Kaufman (1994). | ||||||||||||
| Trumai | 51 | Moribund | Brazil | Settled on the upper Xingu River. Currently reside in the Xingu National Park in the northern part of Mato Grosso. | ||||||||||
| Tuxá | Extinct | Spoken in the states of Bahia and Pernambuco in Brazil until after 1960s. Isolate according to Glottolog. | ||||||||||||
| Urarina | 3,000 | Vulnerable | Peru | Spoken in the central part of the Loreto Region. Part of the Macro-Jibaro proposal. | ||||||||||
| Waorani | 2,000 | Ecuador, Peru | Also known as Sabela. Spoken between the Napo and Curaray rivers. Could be spoken by several groups living in isolation. | |||||||||||
| Warao | 32,800 | Endangered | Guyana, Suriname and Venezuela | Spoken in the Orinoco Delta. Sometimes linked to Paezan. | ||||||||||
| Yahgan | Extinct | Chile | Spoken in far-southern Tierra del Fuego until 2022. Also called Yámana. | |||||||||||
| Yaruro | 7,900 | Vibrant | Venezuela | Spoken along the Orinoco, Cinaruco, Meta, and Apure rivers. Linked to the extinct Esmeralda language. | ||||||||||
| Yuracaré | 2,700 | Endangered | Bolivia | Spoken in the foothills of the Andes, in Cochabamba and Beni Departments. Connections to Mosetenan, Pano–Tacanan, Arawakan, and Chonan have been suggested. |
References
Bibliography
- Campbell, Lyle, ed. 2017. Language Isolates. Routledge.
- Campbell, Lyle. (1997). American Indian languages: The Historical Linguistics of Native America. New York: Oxford University Press. .
- Goddard, Ives (Ed.). (1996). Languages. Handbook of North American Indians (W. C. Sturtevant, General Ed.) (Vol. 17). Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution. .
- Goddard, Ives. (1999). Native Languages and Language Families of North America (rev. and enlarged ed. with additions and corrections). [Map]. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press (Smithsonian Institution). (Updated version of the map in Goddard 1996). .
- Grimes, Barbara F. (Ed.). (2000). Ethnologue: Languages of the world, (14th ed.). Dallas, TX: SIL International. . (Online edition: Ethnologue: Languages of the World).
- Mithun, Marianne. (1999). The languages of Native North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (hbk); .
- Salaberri, Iker, Krajewska, Dorota, Santazilia, Ekaitz & Zuloaga, Eneko (eds.). (2025). Investigating Language Isolates. Typological and Diachronic Perspectives. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
- Sturtevant, William C. (Ed.). (1978–present). Handbook of North American Indians (Vol. 1–20). Washington, D. C.: Smithsonian Institution. (Vols. 1–3, 16, 18–20 not yet published).
References
- Campbell, Lyle. (2010-08-24). "Language Isolates and Their History, or, What's Weird, Anyway?". Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society.
- (2025-01-16). "State of the art of research on language isolates: Introduction". John Benjamins Publishing Company.
- p. xi. Lyle Campbell. 2018. "Introduction". ''Language Isolates'' edited by Lyle Campbell, pp. xi–xiv. Routledge.
- Urban, Matthias. (April 2021). "The geography and development of language isolates". Royal Society Open Science.
- Bradley, John. (2016). "Wuka nya-nganunga li-Yanyuwa li-Anthawirriyarra = Language for us, the Yanyuwa Saltwater People: a Yanyuwa encyclopaedia".
- Thomason, Sarah Grey. (1988). "Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics".
- (2004). "The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the World's Ancient Languages". Cambridge University Press.
- (2000). "The Tarim mummies: ancient China and the mystery of the earliest peoples from the West, with 190 illustrations, 13 in color". Thames & Hudson.
- (1979). "A Concise dictionary of Indian tribes of North America". Reference Publications.
- (July 2001). "Children Creating Language: How Nicaraguan Sign Language Acquired a Spatial Grammar". Psychological Science.
- T., Muzale, H. R.. (2004). "Kamusi ya Lugha ya Alama ya Tanzania (LAT) = Tanzanian Sign Language (TSL) dictionary: Kiswahili-TSL-English". Languages of Tanzania Project, University of Dar es Salaam.
- de Vos, Connie. (March 2011). "Kata Kolok Color Terms and the Emergence of Lexical Signs in Rural Signing Communities". The Senses and Society.
- Nonaka, Angela M.. (July 2009). "Estimating size, scope, and membership of the speech/sign communities of undocumented indigenous/village sign languages: The Ban Khor case study". Language & Communication.
- "UNESCO Interactive Atlas of the World's Languages in Danger". UNESCO.
- Blench, Roger. 2017. African language isolates. In ''Language Isolates'', edited by Lyle Campbell, pp. 176–206. Routledge.
- Starostin, George. (5 February 2016). "The Nilo-Saharan hypothesis tested through lexicostatistics: current state of affairs".
- (2020-04-16). "glottolog/glottolog: Glottolog database 4.2.1".
- Blench, Roger. "Niger-Congo: an Alternative View".
- (September 2018). "Bangime: Secret Language, Language Isolate, or Language Island?".
- "Some Hypotheses About Possible Isolates within the Atlantic Branch of the Niger-Congo Phylum".
- Zamponi, Raoul (2025, forthcoming). ''[https://www.academia.edu/126721374/Zamponi_R_2025_Gule_Routledge_London_and_New_York Gule]''. Routledge World Languages. London: Routledge.
- (2020). "Gule". [[Glottolog]] 4.3.
- (2019). "The Cambridge Handbook of African Linguistics". CUP.
- (29 April 2018). "Highlights of Hadza Fieldwork".
- (2001). "Jalaa: An Almost Forgotten Language of Northeastern Nigeria: A Language Isolate?". Sprache und Geschichte in Afrika.
- Blench, Roger (2007) ''[http://www.ddl.ish-lyon.cnrs.fr/projets/clhass/PageWeb/ressources/Isolats/Mpra%20%20Blench%202007.pdf Recovering data on Mpra (=Mpre) a possible language isolate in North-Central Ghana]''
- Dimmendaal, Gerrit J.. (2011). "Historical Linguistics and the Comparative Study of African Languages". John Benjamins.
- Dimmendaal, Gerrit J.. (2020). "The Oxford Handbook of African Languages". Oxford University Press.
- Güldemann, Tom. (2018). "The Languages and Linguistics of Africa". De Gruyter Mouton.
- (2010). "The Classification of Gumuz and Koman Languages". Language Isolates in Africa Workshop.
- Güldemann, Tom. (2018). "The Languages and Linguistics of Africa". De Gruyter Mouton.
- Joseph Greenberg (2000–2002): ''Indo-European and Its Closest Relatives: The Eurasiatic Language Family'', 2 volumes. Stanford University Press.
- James Tyrone Patrie (1978): ''The genetic relationship of the Ainu language''. PhD thesis, University of Hawaii.
- James Tyrone Patrie (1982): ''The Genetic Relationship of the Ainu Language.'' University of Hawaii Press. {{ISBN. 0-8248-0724-3
- Blench, Roger. 2011. [http://www.rogerblench.info/Language/South%20Asia/NEI/General/Lingres/Declassifying%20Arunachal.pdf ''(De)classifying Arunachal languages: Reconsidering the evidence''] {{webarchive. link. (2013-05-26)
- {{e27. Burushaski
- "John D Bengtson".
- Hamp, Eric P.. (August 2013). "The Expansion of the Indo-European Languages: An Indo-Europeanist's Evolving View". Sino-Platonic Papers.
- Casule, Ilija. 2003. Evidence for the Indo-European laryngeals in Burushaski and its genetic affiliation with Indo-European. ''The Journal of Indo-European Studies'' 31:1–2, pp 21–86.
- [[John Bengtson]], ''Some features of Dene–Caucasian phonology (with special reference to Basque).'' Cahiers de l'Institut de Linguistique de Louvain (CILL) 30.4: 33–54,
- John Bengtson and V. Blazek, "Lexica Dene–Caucasica". Central Asiatic Journal 39, 1995, 11–50 & 161–164
- Stolper, Matthew W. 2008. ''Elamite''. In ''The Ancient Languages of Mesopotamia, Egypt, and Aksum''. pp. 47–50.
- David McAlpin, "Toward Proto-Elamo-Dravidian", ''Language'' vol. 50 no. 1 (1974); David McAlpin: "Elamite and Dravidian, Further Evidence of Relationships", ''Current Anthropology'' vol. 16 no. 1 (1975); David McAlpin: "Linguistic prehistory: the Dravidian situation", in Madhav M. Deshpande and Peter Edwin Hook: ''Aryan and Non-Aryan in India'', Center for South and Southeast Asian Studies, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (1979); David McAlpin, "Proto-Elamo-Dravidian: The Evidence and its Implications", ''Transactions of the American Philosophical Society'' vol. 71 pt. 3, (1981)
- "caste-ethnicity-report {{!}} national_population and housing_census_year results".
- (2019-01-04). "Resuscitating dying Kusunda language". Kathmandupost.com.
- Seidel, Frank. (2015-10-09). "Language Documentation and Endangerment in Africa". John Benjamins Publishing Company.
- "Nihali".
- Nagaraja, K.S. (2014). "The Nihali Language". Central Institute of Indian Languages.
- Fortescue, Michael. 2016. ''Comparative Nivkh Dictionary''. Languages of the World/Dictionaries (LW/D) 62. Munich: Lincom Europa. {{ISBN. 978-3-86288-687-6
- (2011). "The relationship of Nivkh to Chukotko-Kamchatkan revisited". Lingua.
- van Driem, George. (July 1992). "In Quest of Mahākirānti". Center of Nepal and Asian Studies Journal.
- [[Joan Oates]] (1979). ''Babylon'' [Revised Edition] Thames and Hudston, Ltd. 1986 p. 30, 52–53.
- "UNESCO Atlas of the World's Languages in danger".
- Palmer, Bill. (2017). "The Languages and Linguistics of the New Guinea Area". De Gruyter.
- "Size and vitality of Abinomn".
- {{e25. Abun
- (2020). "Abun". [[Glottolog]] 4.3.
- Palmer, Bill. (2018). "The Languages and Linguistics of the New Guinea Area: A Comprehensive Guide". De Gruyter Mouton.
- (2019). "Papua New Guinea languages". [[SIL International]].
- (2018). "The Languages and Linguistics of the New Guinea Area: A Comprehensive Guide". De Gruyter Mouton.
- Ross, Malcolm. (2001). "Is there an East Papuan phylum? Evidence from pronouns". Pacific Linguistics.
- Ross, Malcolm. (2005). "Pronouns as a preliminary diagnostic for grouping Papuan languages". Pacific Linguistics.
- Foley, William A. (2018). "The languages of Northwest New Guinea". In Palmer, Bill (ed.). The Languages and Linguistics of the New Guinea Area: A Comprehensive Guide. The World of Linguistics. Vol. 4. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. pp. 433–568. {{ISBN. 978-3-11-028642-7.
- [https://sites.google.com/site/newguineaworld/families/senu-river NewGuineaWorld, Senu River]
- Campbell, R. "A Sketch Grammar of Urningangk, Erre and Mengerrdji: the Giimbiyu languages of Western Arnhem Land". Honours thesis. University of Melbourne, 2006.
- "Kol".
- (2002). "The East Papuan Languages: A Preliminary Typological Appraisal". Oceanic Linguistics.
- "Did you know Lavukaleve is threatened?".
- Müller, André, Viveka Velupillai, Søren Wichmann, Cecil H. Brown, Eric W. Holman, Sebastian Sauppe, Pamela Brown, Harald Hammarström, Oleg Belyaev, Johann-Mattis List, Dik Bakker, Dmitri Egorov, Matthias Urban, Robert Mailhammer, Matthew S. Dryer, Evgenia Korovina, David Beck, Helen Geyer, Pattie Epps, Anthony Grant, and Pilar Valenzuela. 2013. ''[https://asjp.clld.org/static/WorldLanguageTree-004.zip ASJP World Language Trees of Lexical Similarity: Version 4 (October 2013)]''.
- Nordlinger, Rachel. (2017). "Oxford Handbook of Polysynthesis". Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- {{AIATSIS. N45
- Foley (2018)
- Harald Hammarström. 2010. The Genetic Position of the Mawes Language. Paper presented at the Workshop on the Languages of Papua 2, 8–12 February 2010, Manokwari, Indonesia.
- [https://newguineaworld.linguistik.uzh.ch/families/pauwasi-river New Guinea World]
- Wichmann, Søren. 2013. [http://www.langlxmelanesia.com/wichmann313-386.pdf A classification of Papuan languages] {{Webarchive. link. (2020-11-25 . In: Hammarström, Harald and Wilco van den Heuvel (eds.), History, contact and classification of Papuan languages (Language and Linguistics in Melanesia, Special Issue 2012), 313-386. Port Moresby: Linguistic Society of Papua New Guinea.)
- Foley, William A.. (2018). "The Languages and Linguistics of the New Guinea Area: A Comprehensive Guide". De Gruyter Mouton.
- "SBS Australian Census Explorer".
- Green, I. "The Genetic Status of Murrinh-patha" in Evans, N., ed. "The Non-Pama-Nyungan Languages of Northern Australia: comparative studies of the continent's most linguistically complex region". ''Studies in Language Change'', 552. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, 2003.
- "NewGuineaWorld, Arai and Samaia Rivers".
- (2019). "A Grammar and Dictionary of Tayap: The Life and Death of a Papuan Language". Walter de Gruyter Inc..
- "SBS Australian Census Explorer".
- Lee, Jennifer. (1987). "Tiwi Today: A Study of Language Change in a Contact Situation". Pacific Linguistics.
- "Glottolog 5.2 - Touo".
- Merlan, F. "A Grammar of Wardaman: a language of the Northern Territory of Australia." Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1994.
- Evans, N. "Introduction" in Evans, N., ed. "The Non-Pama-Nyungan Languages of Northern Australia: comparative studies of the continent's most linguistically complex region". ''Studies in Language Change'', 552. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, 2003.
- Stebbins et al. 2018
- "The Basque Language Gains Speakers, but No Surge in Usage – Basque Tribune".
- {{in lang. fr [http://www.mintzaira.fr/fileadmin/documents/Aktualitateak/015_VI_ENQUETE_PB__Fr.pdf VI° Enquête Sociolinguistique en Euskal herria (Communauté Autonome d'Euskadi, Navarre et Pays Basque Nord)] {{Webarchive. link. (21 August 2018 (2016).))
- (1995). "Towards a history of the Basque language". J. Benjamins Pub. Co.
- Mallory, J.P.. (1989). "In search of the Indo-Europeans: language, archaeology, and myth". Thames and Hudson.
- Orduña Aznar, Eduardo. (2005). "Sobre algunos posibles numerales en textos ibéricos". Palaeohispanica.
- (2004). "Some features of Dene-Caucasian Phonology (with special reference to Basque)". Cahiers de l'Institut de Linguistique de Louvain.
- (1989). "The Structure of the Alsea Verb Root: Papers from the 1989 Hokan-Penutian Workshop. Ed. Scott DeLancey". University of Oregon Papers in Linguistics.
- (1997). "Coast Oregon Penutian: Problems and Possibilities". International Journal of American Linguistics.
- Munro, Pamela. (1994). "Gulf and Yuki-Gulf". Anthropological Linguistics.
- Campbell, Lyle. (2024-06-25). "North American Indian Languages North of Mexico". Oxford University PressNew York.
- (2011). "Californian Indian Languages". University of California Press.
- (2009). "Chimariko Grammar: Areal and Typographical Perspective". University of California Press.
- (2014). "Chitimacha: a Mesoamerican Language Spoken in the Lower Mississippi Valley". International Journal of American Linguistics.
- (1996). "Coahuiltecan: A Closer Look". Anthropological Linguistics.
- (2011). "Comparative Hokan-Coahuiltecan Studies: A Survey and Appraisal". De Gruyter.
- (1982). "El Cuitlateco". Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.
- "An Amerind Etymological Dictionary". Dept. of Anthropological Sciences Stanford University.
- (1995). "The Huelel (Esselen) language". International Journal of American Linguistics.
- (1979). "Haida and Na-Dene: A new look at the evidence". International Journal of American Linguistics.
- (1997). "American Indian Languages – The Historical Linguistics of Native America". Oxford Studies in Anthropological Linguistics, Oxford University Press..
- (1963). "Proto-Keresan Phonology". International Journal of American Linguistics.
- Kimball, Geoffry. (2005). "Native Languages of the Southeastern United States". University of Nebraska Press.
- (1956). "Natchez and the Muskogean languages". Language.
- [http://cuentame.inegi.org.mx/hipertexto/todas_lenguas.htm Lenguas indígenas y hablantes de 3 años y más, 2020] {{Webarchive. link. (2016-03-03 INEGI. Censo de Población y Vivienda 2020.)
- (1983). "Areal and Genetic linguistic affiliations of the Salinan". Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics.
- "La situación sociolingüística de la lengua seri en 2006". lengamer.org.
- (1997). "The Takelma Verb: Towards Proto-Takelma-Kalapuyan". International Journal of American Linguistics.
- (1990). "A grammatical sketch of Timucua". International Journal of American Linguistics.
- Frawley, William. (2003). "International encyclopedia of linguistics". Oxford University Press.
- Pierite, Joseph. 1964. Letter to Mary Haas. ''Mary R. Haas Papers''. Mss.Ms.Coll.94. American Philosophical Society Library. Philadelphia.
- (2001). "The Languages of Native North America". Cambridge University Press.
- (2001). "The Languages of Native North America". Cambridge University Press.
- (2001). "The Languages of Native North America". Cambridge University Press.
- (1996). "Handbook of North American Indians: Languages".
- (2014). "The Languages of Native America:Historical and Comparative Assessment". University of Texas Press.
- Van der Voort, Hein. 2005. Kwaza in a comparative perspective. ''International Journal of American Linguistics'' 71: 365–412.
- (2004). "The languages of the Andes". Cambridge University Press.
- (2007). "South America". Routledge.
- Hammarström, Harald. (2010). "The status of the least documented language families in the world". Language Documentation & Conservation.
- Dixon, R. M. W.. (1999). "The Amazonian languages". Cambridge University Press Cambridge.
- "Diccionario etnolingüístico y guía bibliográfica de los pueblos indígenas sudamericanos. CANDOSHI".
- "Tomo II: Amazonia – Canichana". Centre for Language Studies-Radboud University.
- "Tomo II: Amazonia – Cayubaba". Centre for Language Studies-Radboud University.
- "Tomo I: Ámbito andino – Mosetén y Chimane (Tsimane')". Centre for Language Studies-Radboud University.
- "Tomo III: Oriente – Chiquitano". Centre for Language Studies-Radboud University.
- (2008). "Topicalizando Macro-Jê". Nectar.
- "Cofan".
- (1985). "South American Indian Languages: Retrospect and Prospect". University of Texas Press.
- "Yaté".
- (2012). "Classification of the Indigenous Languages of South America: A Comprehensive Guide". De Gruyter.
- "Aspectos culturais (não linguísticos) dos povos falantes de línguas do tronco Macro-Jê-Roteiro para discussão no IX Encontro Macro-Jê".
- (2023). "Amazonian Languages: Language Isolates. Volume I: Aikanã to Kandozi-Chapra". Walter de Gruyter.
- (2012). "Classification of the Indigenous Languages of South America: A Comprehensive Guide". De Gruyter.
- "Documenting Manoki (Mỹky), an isolate of Brazilian Amazonia {{!}} Endangered Languages Archive".
- "Tomo II: Amazonia – Itonama". Centre for Language Studies-Radboud University.
- Kaufman, Terrence. 1994. The native languages of South America. In: Christopher Moseley and R. E. Asher (eds.), ''Atlas of the World's Languages'', 59–93. London: Routledge.
- "Tomo I: Ámbito andino – Leco". Centre for Language Studies-Radboud University.
- (2006). "Los mapuches y su lengua". Centro de Estudios Públicos.
- (2013). "La hipótesis de parentesco Guaicurú-Mataguayo: estado actual de la cuestión". Revista Brasileira de Linguística Antropológica.
- (1950). "Handbook of South American Indians". Government Printing Office: Smithsonian Institution, Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin.
- Campbell, Lyle. (2012). "The Indigenous Languages of South America". De Gruyter Mouton.
- "Tomo II: Amazonia – Movima". Centre for Language Studies-Radboud University.
- (2008). "El Munichi: Un idioma que se extingue". Instituto Linguistico de Verano.
- "Glottolog 5.2 - Mure".
- (2004). "The Languages of the Andes". Cambridge University Press.
- (1999). "The Amazonian Languages". Cambridge University Press.
- Loukotka, Čestmír. (1968). "Classification of South American Indian languages". UCLA Latin American Center.
- "Un nuevo análisis fonológico del Gününa Yajüch". Asociación de Investigadores en Lengua Quechua.
- (1992). "La familia lingüística tehuelche". Revista Patagónica.
- (1990). "Amazonian Linguistics Studies in Lowland South American Languages". University of Texas Press.
- "Glottolog 5.2 - Ramanos".
- Serke, Anna K.. (2022). "A description of Taruma phonology". Universitat Leiden.
- Kaufman, Terrence. (1994). The native languages of South America. In C. Mosley & R. E. Asher (Eds.), ''Atlas of the world's languages'' (pp. 46–76). London: Routledge.
- (May 2021). ""Línguas Indígenas no Brasil: urgência de ações para que sobrevivam." Paper presented at the round table: "A situação atual das línguas indígenas brasileiras", no IX ELESI – Encontro sobre Leitura e Escrita em Sociedades Indígenas (Porto Seguro, BA, 22 a 26 de outubro de 2012). Publicada em: Anari Braz Bomfim & Francisco Vanderlei F. da Costa (orgs), Revitalização de língua indígena e educação escolar indígena inclusiva (Salvador: Egba, 2014, p. 93-117).".
- "Glottolog 5.2 - Tuxá".
- (2006). "A Grammar of Urarina". De Gruyter.
- Kaufman, Terrence. (1990). Language history in South America: What we know and how to know more. In D. L. Payne (Ed.), ''Amazonian linguistics: Studies in lowland South American languages'' (pp. 13–67). Austin: University of Texas Press. {{ISBN. 0-292-70414-3.
- (2010). "CAMINANTES DE LA SELVA". Grupo Internacional de Trabajo sobre Asuntos Indígenas (IWGIA).
- (31 May 2019). "In Chile's remote south, the last speaker of an ancient language fights to keep it alive". Reuters.
- (2004). "The languages of the Andes". Cambridge University Press.
- "Tomo III: Oriente – Yurakare". Centre for Language Studies-Radboud University.
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about Language isolate — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report