Surf Wiki
Save to docs
general/2011-uci-track-cycling-world-championships

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

2011 UCI Track Cycling World Championships – Women's scratch

FieldValue
nameWomen's scatch race
imageJersey rainbow.svg
image_captionRainbow jersey
image_size150px
series2011 UCI Track Cycling World Championships
date26 March 2011
stages1
distance10
unitkm
typemedals
firstMarianne Vos
first_natNetherlands
secondKatherine Bates
second_natAustralia
thirdDanielle King
third_natUnited Kingdom
previous2010
next2012

The Women's scratch at the 2011 UCI Track Cycling World Championships was held on March 26. Nineteen athletes participated in the contest. The competition consisted of 40 laps, making a total of 10 km.

Results

The race was held at 17:20.

RankNameNationLaps down
Marianne VosNetherlands
Katherine BatesAustralia
Danielle King
4Els Belmans
5Aksana Papko
6Małgorzata Wojtyra
7Giorgia BronziniItaly
8Anastasia ChulkovaRussia
9Sofía Arreola NavarroMexico
10Lucie Záleská
11Elke GebhardtGermany
12Débora GálvezSpain
13Diao Xiao Juan
14Fatehah Mustapa
15Jennie ReedUnited States
16Alžbeta Pavlendová
17Yoanka González
18Pascale JeulandFrance
19Paola MuñozChina

References

References

  1. "Start list".
  2. "Final Results".
Info: Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

2011-uci-track-cycling-world-championships uci-track-cycling-world-championships-–-women's-scratch 2011-in-women's-track-cycling
Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about 2011 UCI Track Cycling World Championships – Women's scratch — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report