Skip to content
Surf Wiki
Save to docs
sports

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

2003–04 ULEB Cup

Basketball tournament


Basketball tournament

FieldValue
prevseason[2002–03](2002-03-uleb-cup)
nextseason[2004–05](2004-05-uleb-cup)
titleULEB Cup
t_bg#212A6B
t_color#FFFFFF; border:#F21A22 1px solid;
season2003–04
championsISR **Hapoel Jerusalem**
1st title
runners_upESP Real Madrid
teams36 (competition proper)
finals_MVPKelly McCartyfinals_MVP_n = RUS
finals_MVP_linkEuroCup Basketball Finals MVP
PIR_leaderPriest Lauderdalepir = 28.0pir_n = BUL
top_scorerRasheed Brokenboroughppg = 26.6ppg_n = USA
rebounds_leaderGeert Hamminkrpg = 11.5rpg_n = NED
assists_leaderIvan Tomasapg = 4.8apg_n = CRO

1st title The 2003–04 ULEB Cup was the second season of the second-tier level European professional club basketball competition, EuroCup Basketball, organized by the Euroleague Basketball Company. The EuroCup is the European-wide league level that is one tier below the EuroLeague level. Thirty-six teams participated in thus expanded edition, including 7 league champions. The final was held on April 13, in Charleroi, Belgium, between Real Madrid and Hapoel Jerusalem, the latter winning it by a score of 83–72.

Team allocation

For the first time teams from Israel, Lithuania, Greece, Latvia, Bulgaria, Poland, Austria and England joined the competition which was undisputedly considered now the 2nd tier of European club basketball. Three out of the 36 teams were domestic champions.

Teams

CountryTeamsClubs (ranking in national league)
ESP Spain6Adecco Estudiantes (4th)
GER Germany4Telekom Bonn (1st)
SCG Serbia & Montenegro4Reflex (2nd)
CRO Croatia3Split CO (1st)
FRA France3Le Mans (3rd)
ITA Italy3Breil Milano (5th)
BEL Belgium2Spirou (1st)
GRE Greece2Ionikos Egnatia Bank (8th)
NED Netherlands2Demon Ricoh Astronauts (2nd)
AUT Austria1Superfund Bulls (1st)
BUL Bulgaria1Lukoil Academic (1st)
ENG England1Brighton Bears (2nd)
ISR Israel1Hapoel Jerusalem (8th)
LAT Latvia1Ventspils (1st)
LTU Lithuania1Lietuvos rytas (2nd)
POL Poland1Prokom Trefl Sopot (2nd)

Format

The 2003–04 ULEB Cup featured a total of 36 teams, divided into six groups of six. The round-robin group stage was followed by knock-out stages. The regular season began in November 2003.

Regular season

All 36 teams in 6 groups played a round-robin competition, home and away. Two teams from each group advanced to the knockout stage (eighth-finals). Four teams with best third place records in their respective groups also advanced to the knockout stage.

Eighth-finals

The winners from the eighthfinals advanced to the quarterfinals. The matches were played as two games, home and away. The match winners were determined by point differential.

Quarterfinals

The winners from the quarterfinals advanced to the semifinals. The matches were played as two games, home and away. The match winners were determined by point differential.

Semifinals

The winners from the semifinals advanced to the finals. The matches were played as two games, home and away. The match winners were determined by point differential.

Final

The match was played as one game.

Regular season

Top two places in each group, plus highest-ranked third-place team, advance to Top 16
TeamPldWLPFPADiff
1.ITA Breil Milano1082787684
2.ESP Real Madrid1073804728
3.BUL Lukoil Academic1073855828
4.GER Opel Skyliners1064786715
5.CRO Zagreb1028776882
6.NED Demon Ricoh Astronauts10010656827

Group B

TeamPldWLPFPADiff
1.ESP Caprabo Lleida1082796729
2.ESP Auna Gran Canaria1073770670
3.GER RheinEnergie Köln1064740785
4.CRO Zadar1055773734
5.SCG Atlas1037748774
6.AUT Superfund Bulls1019710845

|}

TeamPldWLPFPADiff
1.ITA Metis Varese1073844770
2.LAT Ventspils1073811772
3.BEL Spirou1064756759
4.SCG Crvena zvezda1055819815
5.ESP Etosa Alicante1037769820
6.FRA Gravelines-Dunkerque1028705768

Group D

TeamPldWLPFPADiff
1.SCG Reflex1091806714
2.ISR Hapoel Jerusalem1064833800
3.ESP DKV Joventut1064801781
4.BEL Go Pass Verviers-Pepinster1037755779
5.ITA Carisbo Virtus Bologna1037769816
6.GER Telekom Bonn1037747815

|}

TeamPldWLPFPADiff
1.ESP Adecco Estudiantes1091833728
2.GRE Makedonikos1064778786
3.FRA Le Mans1055791773
4.SCG Budućnost1055820835
5.NED EiffelTowers Nijmegen1037818832
6.GER Energy Braunschweig1028769855

Group F

TeamPldWLPFPADiff
1.LTU Lietuvos rytas1082786660
2.POL Prokom Trefl Sopot1073790696
3.ENG Brighton Bears1046791807
4.CRO Split CO1046792868
5.FRA Cholet1046762817
6.GRE Ionikos Egnatia Bank1037794867

|}

Elimination rounds

Bracket

|score-width=25

||GRE Makedonikos|89|58|ESP Caprabo Lleida|63|90 ||BEL Spirou|56|91|ESP Adecco Estudiantes|74|84 ||ESP Real Madrid|87|61|ESP Auna Gran Canaria|68|63 ||GER RheinEnergie Köln|81|62|ITA Metis Varese|70|81 ||LAT Ventspils|68|89|SCG Reflex|79|95 ||ESP DKV Joventut|78|69|ITA Breil Milano|62|81 ||ISR Hapoel Jerusalem|77|82|POL Prokom Trefl Sopot|67|86 ||BUL Lukoil Academic|77|78|LTU Lietuvos rytas|80|105

||ESP Caprabo Lleida|82|68|ESP Adecco Estudiantes|73|96 ||ESP Real Madrid|68|62|ITA Metis Varese|67|57 ||SCG Reflex|81|79|ESP DKV Joventut|73|83 ||ISR Hapoel Jerusalem|79|80|LTU Lietuvos rytas|72|81

||ESP Adecco Estudiantes|75|73|ESP Real Madrid|83|82 ||SCG Reflex|70|76|ISR Hapoel Jerusalem|69|79

||ESP Real Madrid|72||ISR Hapoel Jerusalem|83|| Source: ULEB Cup

Top 16

|}

Quarterfinals

|}

Semifinals

|}

Final

April 13, Spiroudome, Charleroi |}

2003–04 ULEB Cup Champions
ISR
**Hapoel Jerusalem**
**1st title**

Finals MVP

  • United States Kelly McCarty (Hapoel Jerusalem)
Info: Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about 2003–04 ULEB Cup — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report