From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
1981–82 NASL indoor season
Indoor soccer league season
Indoor soccer league season
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| competition | North American Soccer League |
| 1981–82 indoor season | |
| season | 1981–82 |
| num_teams | 13 |
| winners | San Diego Sockers |
| premiers | Edmonton Drillers |
| matches | 117 |
| league topscorer | Juli Veee |
| (51 goals) | |
| total goals | 1392 |
| highest attendance | 19,398 |
| (Tampa Bay @ Chicago) | |
| average attendance | 6,202 |
| prevseason | 1980–81 |
| nextseason | 1983 |
1981–82 indoor season (51 goals) (Tampa Bay @ Chicago)
The 1981–82 season was the North American Soccer League's third indoor soccer season.
Overview
Thirteen of a possible 14 NASL teams participated. Fort Lauderdale was the only non-participant in the 18-game regular season. The Los Angeles Aztecs and the Minnesota Kicks had been scheduled to participate but were unable to do so, due to mounting financial issues. By early December both teams had folded. Other changes in the indoor structure included the separating of the teams into two conferences, each with two divisions. The Atlantic Conference contained the East and Central Divisions, while the Pacific Conference held the West and Northwest Divisions. During the regular season teams played eighteen matches within their conference only. Four teams from each conference advanced to the playoffs, which included the two division winners, along with the two non-division winners with the best won-loss record. The championship series was broadcast live on ESPN. The San Diego Sockers won the championship with a two-game finals sweep of the Tampa Bay Rowdies. This was the Sockers' first ever NASL title. Juli Veee of San Diego won both the regular season and playoff MVP awards.
Map of clubs
necks](tulsa-roughnecks-1978-1984)**}}
quakes](san-jose-earthquakes-1974-1988)**}}
Regular season
W = Wins, L = Losses, GB = Games behind 1st place, % = Winning percentage, GF = Goals for, GA = Goals against
Atlantic Conference
| East Division | W | L | GB | % | GF | GA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Montreal Manic | 9 | 9 | – | .500 | 93 | 97 |
| Toronto Blizzard | 8 | 10 | 1 | .444 | 86 | 96 |
| Jacksonville Tea Men | 7 | 11 | 2 | .389 | 86 | 106 |
| New York Cosmos | 6 | 12 | 3 | .333 | 102 | 123 |
| Central Division | W | L | GB | % | GF | GA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chicago Sting | 12 | 6 | – | .667 | 139 | 117 |
| Tampa Bay Rowdies | 11 | 7 | 1 | .611 | 121 | 113 |
| Tulsa Roughnecks | 10 | 8 | 2 | .556 | 128 | 103 |
Pacific Conference
| West Division | W | L | GB | % | GF | GA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| San Diego Sockers | 10 | 8 | – | .556 | 147 | 110 |
| Portland Timbers | 7 | 11 | 3 | .389 | 86 | 103 |
| San Jose Earthquakes | 5 | 13 | 5 | .278 | 83 | 141 |
| Northwest Division | W | L | GB | % | GF | GA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edmonton Drillers | 13 | 5 | – | .722 | 133 | 92 |
| Vancouver Whitecaps | 10 | 8 | 3 | .556 | 93 | 94 |
| Seattle Sounders | 9 | 9 | 4 | .500 | 95 | 97 |
NASL All-Stars
First team
| Pacific Conference | date=February 2022}} | Atlantic Conference |
|---|---|---|
| Volkmar Gross, San Diego | G | Jürgen Stars, Tampa Bay |
| Alan Hudson, Seattle | D | Barry Wallace, Tulsa |
| Martin Donnelly, San Diego | D | Mike Connell, Tampa Bay |
| Jan Goossens, Edmonton | F | Tatu, Tampa Bay |
| Kai Haaskivi, Edmonton | F | Karl-Heinz Granitza, Chicago |
| Juli Veee, San Diego | F | Gordon Hill, Montreal |
Second team
| Pacific Conference | Position | Atlantic Conference |
|---|---|---|
| John Baretta, Edmonton | G | Blagoje Tamindžić, Toronto |
| Bernie James, Edmonton | D | Derek Spalding, Chicago |
| Gert Wieczorkowski, San Diego | D | John Gorman, Tampa Bay |
| Dale Mitchell, Portland | F | Pato Margetic, Chicago |
| Carl Valentine, Vancouver | F | Laurie Abrahams, Tulsa |
| Jean Willrich, San Diego | F | Ingo Peter, Chicago |
Playoffs
Bracket
Best-of-3 Best-of-3 Best-of-3 | score-width=25 | RD1-seed1=P1 | RD1-team1=Edmonton Drillers | RD1-score1-1=8 | RD1-score1-2=12 | RD1-score1-3= – | RD1-seed2=P4 | RD1-team2=Seattle Sounders | RD1-score2-1=6 | RD1-score2-2=4 | RD1-score2-3= – | RD1-seed3=P2 | RD1-team3=San Diego Sockers | RD1-score3-1=4 | RD1-score3-2=8 | RD1-score3-3= – | RD1-seed4=P3 | RD1-team4=Vancouver Whitecaps | RD1-score4-1= 3 | RD1-score4-2= 4 | RD1-score4-3= – | RD1-seed5=A1 | RD1-team5=Chicago Sting | RD1-score5-1= 4 | RD1-score5-2='7'''''(OT) | RD1-score5-3= 1 | RD1-seed6=A4 | RD1-team6=Tulsa Roughnecks | RD1-score6-1=5 | RD1-score6-2=6 | RD1-score6-3= 3 | RD1-seed7=A2 | RD1-team7=Montreal Manic | RD1-score7-1=7 | RD1-score7-2=3 | RD1-score7-3= 1 | RD1-seed8=A3 | RD1-team8=Tampa Bay Rowdies | RD1-score8-1= '8'''''(OT) | RD1-score8-2= 2 | RD1-score8-3= '2'''''(3OT) | RD2-seed1=P1 | RD2-team1=Edmonton Drillers | RD2-score1-1= 2 | RD2-score1-2= 3 | RD2-score1-3= – | RD2-seed2=P2 | RD2-team2=San Diego Sockers | RD2-score2-1=8 | RD2-score2-2=12 | RD2-score2-3= – | RD2-seed3= A4 | RD2-team3=Tulsa Roughnecks | RD2-score3-1= 4 | RD2-score3-2=4 | RD2-score3-3= 0 | RD2-seed4=A3 | RD2-team4=Tampa Bay Rowdies | RD2-score4-1= 5 | RD2-score4-2= 3 | RD2-score4-3= 1 | RD3-seed1=P2 | RD3-team1=San Diego Sockers | RD3-score1-1=9 | RD3-score1-2=10 | RD3-score1-3= – | RD3-seed2=A3 | RD3-team2=Tampa Bay Rowdies | RD3-score2-1=7 | RD3-score2-2=5 | RD3-score2-3= –
1st round
If a playoff series is tied after two games, a 15 minute, tie breaker mini-game is played.
| Higher seed | Lower seed | Game 1 | Game 2 | Mini-game |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attendance | ||||
| Edmonton Drillers | - | Seattle Sounders | 8–6 | 12–4 |
| San Diego Sockers | - | Vancouver Whitecaps | 4–3 | 8–4 |
| Montreal Manic | - | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 7–8 (OT) | 3–2 |
| Chicago Sting | - | Tulsa Roughnecks | 4–5 | 7–6 (OT) |
Semi-finals
| Higher seed | Lower seed | Game 1 | Game 2 | Mini-game |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attendance | ||||
| Tampa Bay Rowdies | - | Tulsa Roughnecks | 5–4 | 3–4 |
| Edmonton Drillers | - | San Diego Sockers | #2–8 | 3–12 |
Championship finals
| *Higher seed | Lower seed | Game 1 | Game 2 | Mini-game |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attendance | ||||
| Tampa Bay Rowdies | - | San Diego Sockers | 7–9 | 5–10 |
Championship match reports
Veee Coker Hilkes Veee Deyna Coker Willrich Willrich Roe Pérez McLeod Pérez Gruber Gruber McLeod Tatu Zequinha Roberts Veee Deyna Deyna Fernandez Hilkes Willrich Coker Willrich Veee 1981–82 NASL Indoor Champions: San Diego Sockers
Postseason awards
- Most Valuable Player: Juli Veee, San Diego
- Playoff MVP: Juli Veee, San Diego
References
References
- Beard, Randy. (March 5, 1982). "Veee: Future of soccer is indoors". The Evening Independent.
- (November 5, 1981). "NASL to proceed with season sans three". Ellensburg Daily Record.
- (November 5, 1981). "NASL cuts indoor entries". The Spokesman-Review.
- Brockmann, John. (December 5, 1981). "Rowdies Indoor Opener With Manic Is A Sellout". Sarasota Herald-Tribune.
- eddiebear60. (June 26, 2016). "San Diego Sockers vs Tampa Bay Rowdies, 1982 NASL Indoor Finals, Game 1".
- eddiebear60. (March 23, 2013). "San Diego Sockers vs Tampa Bay Rowdies, 1982 NASL Indoor Finals, Game 2".
- Reeves, Dave. (March 9, 1982). "Sockers sock Rowdies". Lakeland Ledger.
- (February 2022)
- "All-League Teams - Indoor Soccer Hall of Fame".
- Scheiber, Dave. (March 2, 1982). "Rowdies give Tulsa the boot". St. Petersburg Times.
- Flanagan, Mike. (March 3, 1982). "Sockers soared after they took indoor seriously". The Evening Independent.
- (March 2, 1982). "Drillers come up empty". The Evening Independent.
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about 1981–82 NASL indoor season — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report