Owain Danwyn

Quality 0.50 · 1 view · Updated 2 months ago

King of Rhos in the mid-5th century

title: "Owain Danwyn" type: doc version: 1 created: 2026-02-28 author: "Wikipedia contributors" status: active scope: public tags: ["5th-century-welsh-monarchs", "historical-figures-as-candidates-of-king-arthur", "monarchs-of-rhos"] description: "King of Rhos in the mid-5th century" topic_path: "general/5th-century-welsh-monarchs" source: "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Owain_Danwyn" license: "CC BY-SA 4.0" wikipedia_page_id: 0 wikipedia_revision_id: 0

::summary King of Rhos in the mid-5th century ::

Owain Danwyn (fl. 440) was a king of Rhos in Gwynedd, northwestern Wales, in the mid-5th century. He was the son of Einion Yrth ap Cunedda and the father of Cynlas Goch, probably the Cuneglasus excoriated by Gildas. Very little is known of his life. Graham Phillips and Martin Keatman proposed a theory that he was the historical figure behind the legend of King Arthur.

History

Owain Danwyn (Old Welsh Dantguin, also spelled Ddanwyn, Ddantgwyn, etc., meaning "White Tooth"), is known from several medieval genealogies of the kings of Rhos. Most of these concur that he was the son of Einion Yrth ap Cunedda and grandson of Cunedda, founder of the Gwynedd dynasty in North Wales. His brother was Cadwallon Lawhir ap Einion, known from the Gwynedd pedigrees. Owain was the father of Cynlas Goch, who is identified with the prince named Cuneglasus who Gildas castigated for his various sins in De Excidio et Conquestu Britanniae. According to the Bonedd y Saint, a genealogy of British saints, Owain was also the father of the saints Einion Frenin, Seiriol and Meirion, and in some versions, Hawystl Gloff.

According to Gildas, Maelgwn, the son of Owain's brother Cadwallon, took the throne of Gwynedd by murdering an uncle. Peter Bartrum suggests this may have been Owain, though he notes that Gildas' term avunculus typically refers to a maternal uncle.

Arthurian identification

Writers Graham Phillips and Martin Keatman proposed that Owain Danwyn was the historical basis for the legendary King Arthur. This theory is based partly on their interpretation of the British power structure in the 5th century and interpretations of names and epithets associated with Owain's family. According to Phillips and Keatman, "Arthur" was Owain's honorific title, meaning "Bear", and his capital was Viroconium in Shropshire, England.

Charles T. Wood commented that their thesis lacked conclusive proof but noted that their book was "always accurate in its use of sources and seldom wildly farfetched in the conclusions it draws". Rodney Castleden criticized the assumptions Phillips and Keatman based their conclusions on.

References

References

  1. Bartrum, Peter. (1993). "A Welsh Classical Dictionary: People in History and Legend up to about A.D. 1000". [[National Library of Wales]].
  2. Bartrum, Peter. (1993). "A Welsh Classical Dictionary: People in History and Legend up to about A.D. 1000". [[National Library of Wales]].
  3. Bartrum, Peter. (1993). "A Welsh Classical Dictionary: People in History and Legend up to about A.D. 1000". [[National Library of Wales]].
  4. Graham Phillips and Martin Keatman; ''King Arthur: The True Story'', Century, 1992.
  5. (Fall 1995). "Reviewed Works: ''From Scythia to Camelot: A Radical Reassessment of the Legends of King Arthur, the Knights of the Round Table and the Holy Grail'', by C. Scott Littleton and Linda A. Malcor; and ''King Arthur: The True Story'' by Graham Phillips and Martin Keatman". [[Arthuriana]].
  6. Castleden, Rodney. (2003). "King Arthur: The Truth Behind the Legend". Routledge.

::callout[type=info title="Wikipedia Source"] This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page. ::

5th-century-welsh-monarchshistorical-figures-as-candidates-of-king-arthurmonarchs-of-rhos