Our Stolen Future

1996 book by Theo Colborn, Dianne Dumanoski and John Peterson Myers


title: "Our Stolen Future" type: doc version: 1 created: 2026-02-28 author: "Wikipedia contributors" status: active scope: public tags: ["1996-non-fiction-books", "endocrinology"] description: "1996 book by Theo Colborn, Dianne Dumanoski and John Peterson Myers" topic_path: "general/1996-non-fiction-books" source: "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Our_Stolen_Future" license: "CC BY-SA 4.0" wikipedia_page_id: 0 wikipedia_revision_id: 0

::summary 1996 book by Theo Colborn, Dianne Dumanoski and John Peterson Myers ::

::data[format=table title="Infobox book"]

FieldValue
nameOur Stolen Future: Are We Threatening Our Fertility, Intelligence, and Survival? A Scientific Detective Story
imageOur Stolen Future.jpg
authorTheo Colborn
Dianne Dumanoski
John Peterson Myers
countryUnited States
languageEnglish
subjectEndocrine disruptors, public health
publisherDutton
release_date1996
pages306
isbn978-0-525-93982-5
congressRA1224.2.C65
oclc33246122
::

| name = Our Stolen Future: Are We Threatening Our Fertility, Intelligence, and Survival? A Scientific Detective Story | title_orig = | image = Our Stolen Future.jpg | caption = | author = Theo Colborn Dianne Dumanoski John Peterson Myers | cover_artist = | country = United States | language = English | series = | subject = Endocrine disruptors, public health | genre = | publisher = Dutton | release_date = 1996 | pages = 306 | isbn = 978-0-525-93982-5 | dewey = | congress = RA1224.2.C65 | oclc = 33246122 | followed_by =

Our Stolen Future: Are We Threatening Our Fertility, Intelligence, and Survival? A Scientific Detective Story is a 1996 book by Theo Colborn, Dianne Dumanoski, and John Peterson Myers. The book chronicles the development of the endocrine disruptor hypothesis by Colborn. Though written for the popular press in narrative form, the book contains a substantial amount of scientific evidence. A foreword from then Vice President Al Gore increased the book's visibility. It ultimately influenced government policy through congressional hearings and helped foster the development of a research and regulation initiative within the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

The authors also started a website which continues to monitor and report on endocrine disruptor scientific research.

Thousands of scientific articles have since been published on endocrine disruption, demonstrating the availability of grant money for research on the hypothesis raised by Our Stolen Future. For example, a symposium at the 2007 American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) meeting explored the contribution of endocrine disruption to obesity and metabolic disorder. As is often the case, there is strong animal evidence but few epidemiological tests of predictions based on the animal experiments.

A 2006 analysis of Centers for Disease Control (CDC) data found an extraordinary increase in risk to type II diabetes as a function of exposure to persistent organic pollutants (POPs), in particular synthetic organic chemicals such as organohalogens.

References

References

  1. "Shortcuts to recent important studies".
  2. (2006). "A Strong Dose-Response Relation Between Serum Concentrations of Persistent Organic Pollutants and Diabetes: Results from the National Health and Examination Survey 1999-2002". Diabetes Care.

::callout[type=info title="Wikipedia Source"] This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page. ::

1996-non-fiction-booksendocrinology