Lixtor

---

title: "Lixtor" type: doc version: 1 created: 2026-02-28 author: "Wikipedia contributors" status: active scope: public tags: ["online-auction-websites", "online-marketplaces-of-new-zealand", "privately-held-companies-of-new-zealand", "internet-properties-established-in-2005", "new-zealand-companies-established-in-2005"] description: "New Zealand internet auction website" topic_path: "geography/new-zealand" source: "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lixtor" license: "CC BY-SA 4.0" wikipedia_page_id: 0 wikipedia_revision_id: 0

::summary New Zealand internet auction website ::

::data[format=table title="Infobox company"]

Field	Value
logo	Lixtor-Logo.png
type	Privately held company
foundation	2005
location_city	Birkenhead, Auckland
location_country	NZ
industry	Internet-auction
revenue	Not Available (2008)
num_employees	less than 10
homepage	http://www.lixtor.co.nz/
::

| logo = Lixtor-Logo.png | type = Privately held company | foundation = 2005 | location_city = Birkenhead, Auckland | location_country = NZ | industry = Internet-auction | revenue = Not Available (2008) | num_employees = less than 10 | homepage = http://www.lixtor.co.nz/ Lixtor is an internet auction website operating in New Zealand since 2005, as a free alternative to Trade Me or Facebook Marketplace.

Lixtor's business model is substantially different from its rival site Trade Me as it tries to operate its business on advertising revenue rather than charging users on listing fees and success fee.

Controversy

On 6 November 2008, the National Business Review reported on an article that Lixtor has been legally-threatened by Trade Me over "copyright infringement" on their "Privacy Policy" and "Terms and Conditions". However, Lixtor stated that it was carried out by Trade Me to "intimidate" Lixtor because Trade Me was threatened by Lixtor's "no fee" business model.

Following this dispute with Trade Me, Lixtor listed their auction site for sale on Trade Me on 17 November 2008, with the starting bid $100,000,000. The listing was listed with the option to support Plunket by rounding up the success fee. However the auction was disabled by the Trade Me administrators hours after the auction.

Nonetheless, Lixtor re-listed the auction minutes after their listing was disabled by Trade Me moderators, but this second listing was also removed hours later. No more listings were reported after this, possibly due to Trade Me's policy to suspend the "suspicious" members.

On 20 November 2008, a community newspaper The Aucklander also reported that Trade Me's lawyers asked Lixtor to remove their "Terms and Conditions".

On 3 February 2009, in the wake of the emerging New Zealand copyright law Section 92a, New Zealand Creative Freedom Foundation published an article which stated that Lixtor vs. Trade Me case is a good example of how the new section 92a in the New Zealand copyright law could be "misused", if passed.

References

References

1. Kloeten, Niko. (6 November 2008). "TradeMe trying to 'intimidate', says auction rival". [[National Business Review]].
2. [http://www.lixtor.co.nz/help/about-lixtor.aspx Lixtor.co.nz] – ''About Lixtor''
3. [http://www.trademe.co.nz/Business-farming-industry/Businesses-for-sale/Internet-technology/auction-188370102.htm TradeMe]{{dead link. (January 2018)
4. link. (16 February 2012 – ''Lixtor is FOR SALE for $100,000,000 on TradeMe'')
5. (November 2018)
6. (January 2018)
7. [http://www.geekzone.co.nz/freitasm/3927 Mauricio Freitas] – ''Trade Me closing accounts?''
8. [https://presspix.nzherald.co.nz/presspix/control/detail?productId=201108AKLSWlixtor4.JPG The Aucklander] – ''Newbie takes on TradeMe''
9. "Guilt Upon Accusation: New Zealand Businesses". Creative Freedom NZ.

::callout[type=info title="Wikipedia Source"] This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page. ::