Impunity

Quality 0.50 · 2 views · Updated 2 months ago

Ability to not be punished or face legal consequences

title: "Impunity" type: doc version: 1 created: 2026-02-28 author: "Wikipedia contributors" status: active scope: public tags: ["human-rights", "punishment", "legal-terminology", "international-law", "legal-immunity", "impunity"] description: "Ability to not be punished or face legal consequences" topic_path: "law" source: "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impunity" license: "CC BY-SA 4.0" wikipedia_page_id: 0 wikipedia_revision_id: 0

::summary Ability to not be punished or face legal consequences ::

Impunity is the ability to act with exemption from punishments, losses, or other negative consequences. In the international law of human rights, impunity is failure to bring perpetrators of human rights violations to justice and, as such, itself constitutes a denial of the victims' right to justice and redress. Impunity is especially common in countries which lack the tradition of rule of law, or suffer from pervasive corruption, or contain entrenched systems of patronage, or where the judiciary is weak or members of the security forces are protected by special jurisdictions or immunities. Impunity is sometimes considered a form of denialism of historical crimes.

Examples

The Armenian genocide was fueled by impunity for the perpetrators of earlier massacres of Armenians, such as the 1890s Hamidian massacres. After the genocide, the Treaty of Sèvres required Turkey to allow the return of refugees and enable them to recover their properties. However, Turkey did not allow the return of refugees and nationalized all Armenian properties. A secret annex to the Treaty of Lausanne granted immunity to the perpetrators of the Armenian genocide and put an end to the effort to prosecute Ottoman war criminals. Hardly anyone was prosecuted for the systematic murder of hundreds of thousands of Armenians. According to historian Stefan Ihrig, the failure to intervene and hold perpetrators accountable made the genocide the "double original sin" of the twentieth century.

Human rights principles

The amended Set of Principles for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights Through Action to Combat Impunity, submitted to the United Nations Commission on Human Rights on 8 February 2005, defines impunity as: ::quote

::

The First Principle of that same document states that: ::quote Impunity arises from a failure by States to meet their obligations to investigate violations; to take appropriate measures in respect of the perpetrators, particularly in the area of justice, by ensuring that those suspected of criminal responsibility are prosecuted, tried and duly punished; to provide victims with effective remedies and to ensure that they receive reparation for the injuries suffered; to ensure the inalienable right to know the truth about violations; and to take other necessary steps to prevent a recurrence of violations. ::

Truth commissions are frequently established by nations emerging from periods marked by human rights violations – coups d'état, military dictatorships, civil wars, etc. – in order to cast light on the events of the past. While such mechanisms can assist in the ultimate prosecution of crimes and punishment of the guilty, they have often been criticised for perpetuating impunity by enabling violators to seek protection of concurrently adopted amnesty laws.

The primary goal of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, adopted on 17 July 1998 and entered into force on 1 July 2002, is "to put an end to impunity for the perpetrators" [...] "of the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole".

References

References

  1. "Free Dictionary". Free Dictionary.
  2. (2018). "Denial in Other Forms". Genocide Studies and Prevention.
  3. (2003). "The History of the Armenian Genocide: Ethnic Conflict from the Balkans to Anatolia to the Caucasus". Berghahn Books.
  4. (2011). "The Taboo within the Taboo: The Fate of 'Armenian Capital' at the End of the Ottoman Empire". European Journal of Turkish Studies. Social Sciences on Contemporary Turkey.
  5. (1996). "The Letter of the Law: The Scope of the International Legal Obligation to Prosecute Human Rights Crimes". Law and Contemporary Problems.
  6. (2010). "Crimes Against Humanity: The Case for a Specialized Convention". Washington University Global Studies Law Review.
  7. (1998). "The Historical and Legal Interconnections Between the Armenian Genocide and the Jewish Holocaust: From Impunity to Retributive Justice". Yale Journal of International Law.
  8. (1999). "Impunity- Inertia, Inaction, and Invalidity: A Literature Review". Boston University International Law Journal.
  9. (2011). "The Armenian Genocide : International Legal and Political Avenues for Turkey's Responsibility". Université de Sherbrooke.
  10. (2016). "[[Justifying Genocide: Germany and the Armenians from Bismarck to Hitler]]". Harvard University Press.
  11. "Principles for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights Through Action to Combat Impunity". Derechos.org.
  12. [http://ictj.org/publication/what-next-international-justice "What Next for International Justice?"]''International Center for Transitional Justice''
  13. "Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court".

::callout[type=info title="Wikipedia Source"] This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page. ::

human-rightspunishmentlegal-terminologyinternational-lawlegal-immunityimpunity