General-purpose technology
Technologies that can affect an entire economy at large scale
title: "General-purpose technology" type: doc version: 1 created: 2026-02-28 author: "Wikipedia contributors" status: active scope: public tags: ["technological-change", "economic-growth"] description: "Technologies that can affect an entire economy at large scale" topic_path: "philosophy" source: "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General-purpose_technology" license: "CC BY-SA 4.0" wikipedia_page_id: 0 wikipedia_revision_id: 0
::summary Technologies that can affect an entire economy at large scale ::
General-purpose technologies (GPTs) are technologies that can affect an entire economy (usually at a national or global level). GPTs have the potential to drastically alter societies through their impact on pre-existing economic and social structures. The archetypal examples of GPTs are the steam engine, electricity, and information technology. Other examples include the railroad, interchangeable parts, electronics, material handling, mechanization, control theory (automation), the automobile, the computer, the Internet, medicine, and artificial intelligence, in particular generative pre-trained transformers.
In economics, it is theorized that initial adoption of a new GPT within an economy may, before improving productivity, actually decrease it, due to: time required for development of new infrastructure; learning costs; and, obsolescence of old technologies and skills. This can lead to a "productivity J-curve" as unmeasured intangible assets are built up and then harvested. Impending timeframe to utilize the latent benefits of the new technology is deemed a trade-off. Spin-out firms/inventors from organizations that had developed GPTs play an important role in developing applications for GPTs. However, it has been observed that the level of cumulative innovation in GPTs diminishes as more spin-outs into application development occur.
Historical GPT according to Lipsey and Carlaw
Economists Richard Lipsey and Kenneth Carlaw suggest that there have only been 24 technologies in history that can be classified as true GPTs. They define a transforming GPT according to the four criteria listed below:
- is a single, recognisable generic technology
- initially has much scope for improvement but comes to be widely used across the economy
- has many different uses
- creates many spillover effects Since their book, more GPTs have been added for the 21st century.
A GPT can be a product, a process or an organisational system.
Foundational
The earliest technologies mentioned by Lipsey and Carlaw occur before the Neolithic period and have not been cast as GPTs, however, they are innovations that the other 24 rely upon. ::data[format=table]
| Classification | Date |
|---|---|
| Spoken Language | process |
| Clothing | product |
| Mastery of fire | process |
| Coil pottery | product |
| Weapons (sharp-edged tools) | product |
| :: |
Expanded list of 25 technologies
::data[format=table]
Steam engine increased labor productivity annually by 0.34%; IT by 0.6% (1995–2005); robotics by 0.36% (1993–2007).
GPT in military and defense-related procurement
In his book, Is War Necessary for Economic Growth?: Military Procurement and Technology Development, Vernon W. Ruttan, Regents Professor Emeritus in the Department of Applied Economics at the University of Minnesota, examines the impact of military and defense-related procurement on U.S. technology development. Ruttan identifies the development of six general-purpose technologies:
- Interchangeable parts and mass production
- Military and commercial aircraft
- Nuclear energy
- Computers and semi-conductors
- The Internet
- The space industries
Based on his reading of the histories of these technologies, Ruttan finds that military and defense-related procurement has been a major source of technology development. He believes that the current technological landscape would look very different in the absence of military and defense-related contributions to commercial technology development. However, from his research, Ruttan determines that commercial technology development would have occurred in the absence of military procurement but more slowly, e.g., the aircraft, computer, and Internet industries. He cites nuclear power as an example of a general-purpose technology that would not have developed in the absence of military and defense-related procurement.
References
References
- Landes, David S.. (1976). "The Unbound Prometheus: Technological Change and Industrial Development in Western Europe from ...". At the University Press.
- Rosenberg, Nathan. (1982). "Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics". Cambridge University Press.
- (1995-01-01). "General purpose technologies 'Engines of growth'?". Journal of Econometrics.
- (2016-09-01). "ICT as a general-purpose technology: The productivity of ICT in the United States revisited". Information Economics and Policy.
- (2021). "The Productivity J-Curve: How Intangibles Complement General Purpose Technologies". American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics.
- Shimizu, Hiroshi. (2019). "General purpose technology, spin-out, and innovation: technological development of laser diodes in the United States and Japan". Springer.
- Lipsey, Richard. (2005). "Economic Transformations: General Purpose Technologies and Long-Term Economic Growth". Oxford University Press.
- (16 June 2015). "Robots Seem to be Improving Productivity, Not Costing Jobs". Harvard Business Review.
- Ruttan, Vernon. (2006). "Is War Necessary for Economic Growth?: Military Procurement and Technology Development". Oxford University Press.
::callout[type=info title="Wikipedia Source"] This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page. ::