Eumetazoa

Quality 0.50 · 4 views · Updated 2 months ago

Basal animal clade as a sister group of the Porifera

title: "Eumetazoa" type: doc version: 1 created: 2026-02-28 author: "Wikipedia contributors" status: active scope: public tags: ["animal-taxa", "subkingdoms", "ediacaran-first-appearances"] description: "Basal animal clade as a sister group of the Porifera" topic_path: "general/animal-taxa" source: "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eumetazoa" license: "CC BY-SA 4.0" wikipedia_page_id: 0 wikipedia_revision_id: 0

::summary Basal animal clade as a sister group of the Porifera ::

| fossil_range = Ediacaran - Present | image = Epitheliozoa collage.png | taxon = Eumetazoa | authority = Buetschli, 1910 | subdivision_ranks = Subdivisions | subdivision =

Eumetazoa (), also known as Epitheliozoa or Histozoa, is a proposed basal animal subkingdom as a sister group of Porifera (sponges). The basal eumetazoan clades are the Ctenophora and the ParaHoxozoa. Placozoa is now also seen as a eumetazoan in the ParaHoxozoa. The competing hypothesis is the Myriazoa clade. The subkingdom Parazoa and Agnotozoa are the other taxa, and agnotozoa may be fake or even nonexistent at studies. Parazoa or Agnotozoa are a main sister group to eumetazoans, forming clade Blastozoa/Diploblastozoa. Alternatively, Parazoa was considered as a sister group to Agnotozoa (now considered polyphyletic). Several other extinct or obscure life forms, such as Iotuba and Thectardis, appear to have emerged in the group. Characteristics of eumetazoans include true tissues organized into germ layers, the presence of neurons and muscles, and an embryo that goes through a gastrula stage.

Some phylogenists once speculated the sponges and eumetazoans evolved separately from different single-celled organisms, which would have meant that the animal kingdom does not form a clade (a complete grouping of all organisms descended from a common ancestor). However, genetic studies and some morphological characteristics, like the common presence of choanocytes, now unanimously support a common origin.

Traditionally, eumetazoans are a major group of animals in the Five Kingdoms classification of Lynn Margulis and K. V. Schwartz, comprising the Radiata and Bilateria – all animals except the sponges.

Evolutionary origins

It has been suggested that one type of molecular clock and one approach to interpretation of the fossil record both place the evolutionary origins of eumetazoa in the Ediacaran. However, the earliest eumetazoans may not have left a clear impact on the fossil record and other interpretations of molecular clocks suggest the possibility of an earlier origin. The discoverers of Vernanimalcula describe it as the fossil of a bilateral triploblastic animal that appeared at the end of the Marinoan glaciation prior to the Ediacaran period, implying an even earlier origin for eumetazoans. Various ediacaran organisms have been tentatively classified as eumetazoans. But so far, very few Ediacaran organisms have been identified as definite eumetazoans like- Kimberella, Haootia and Dickinsonia. Ediacaran fossils preserve very little details so identifying one as an animal with true tissue is very difficult. Many extinct phyla have been proposed by many researchers that may fall under the clade. These are Proarticulata, Trilobozoa and Petalonamae. The inclusion of these within eumetazoa as well as the position of these within the clade is highly debated and sometimes considered speculative. The proarticulates are considered as stem bilaterians by most authors. Together the three phyla are grouped as the grade Vendobionta.The petalonamids are often considered as early diverging animals before animals with true tissue organisation started to appear.

References==

References

  1. (2024). "Flourishing chancelloriids from the Cambrian Kaili Biota of South China". Historical Biology.
  2. Fedonkin, M. A. (1990). Systematic description of Vendian Metazoa. In: Sokolov, B. S. & Iwanowski, A. B. (eds), The Vendian System: Historical–Geological and Paleontological Foundation, Vol. 1. Springer, pp. 71–120. Fedonkin describes trilobozoans as coelenterate-like organisms, implying eumetazoan affinities.
  3. [[Ray Lankester. Lankester, Ray]] (1877). "Notes on the Embryology and classification of the Animal kingdom: comprising a revision of speculations relative to the origin and significance of the germ-layers". ''Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science'' (N.S.), No. 68: 399–454.
  4. Beklemishev, V. L. ''The basis of the comparative anatomy of the invertebrates'' [''Основы сравнительной анатомии беспозвоночных'']. 1st ed., 1944; 2nd ed., 1950; 3rd ed. (2 vols.), 1964. English translation, 1969, [https://archive.org/details/principlesofcomp0002bekl]. Akademia Nauk, Moscow, Leningrad.
  5. Ax, Peter. (2012-12-06). "Multicellular Animals: A new Approach to the Phylogenetic Order in Nature". Springer Science & Business Media.
  6. Ulrich, W.. (1950). "Moderne Biologie. Festschrift zum 60. Geburtstag von Hans Nachtsheim". Peters.
  7. (2017). "Improved Modeling of Compositional Heterogeneity Supports Sponges as Sister to All Other Animals". Current Biology.
  8. (15 December 2015). "Genomic data do not support comb jellies as the sister group to all other animals". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
  9. (3 April 2017). "A Large and Consistent Phylogenomic Dataset Supports Sponges as the Sister Group to All Other Animals". Current Biology.
  10. Giribet, Gonzalo. (1 October 2016). "Genomics and the animal tree of life: conflicts and future prospects". Zoologica Scripta.
  11. (2018-10-30). "Support for a clade of Placozoa and Cnidaria in genes with minimal compositional bias". eLife.
  12. (2023-05-17). "Ancient gene linkages support ctenophores as sister to other animals". Nature.
  13. (1999). "Hox clusters: Size doesn't matter". Nature.
  14. (April 2009). "Phylogenomics revives traditional views on deep animal relationships". Current Biology.
  15. link. (2009-03-22 . Retrieved February 2, 2006)
  16. (July 2005). "Origin of the Eumetazoa: testing ecological predictions of molecular clocks against the Proterozoic fossil record". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A..
  17. (March 2005). "Molecular clocks do not support the Cambrian explosion". Molecular Biology and Evolution.
  18. (9 July 2004). "Small bilaterian fossils from 40 to 55 million years before the Cambrian". Science.
  19. Ivantsov, A. Yu. (2021). "Proarticulates—an extinct phylum of soft-bodied metazoans, or a group of vendobionts par excellence?" ''Symmetry''. '''13'''(2): 160. [https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/13/2/160 Full text]. doi:10.3390/sym13020160.

::callout[type=info title="Wikipedia Source"] This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page. ::

animal-taxasubkingdomsediacaran-first-appearances