Agnotology

Quality 0.50 · 2 views · Updated 2 months ago

Study of culturally induced ignorance or doubt

title: "Agnotology" type: doc version: 1 created: 2026-02-28 author: "Wikipedia contributors" status: active scope: public tags: ["2000s-neologisms", "cognitive-inertia", "doubt", "error", "ignorance", "interdisciplinary-subfields-of-sociology"] description: "Study of culturally induced ignorance or doubt" topic_path: "general/2000s-neologisms" source: "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agnotology" license: "CC BY-SA 4.0" wikipedia_page_id: 0 wikipedia_revision_id: 0

::summary Study of culturally induced ignorance or doubt ::

::figure[src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6c/Inhofe_holding_snowball.jpg" caption="url-status=live }}"] ::

Within the sociology of knowledge, agnotology (formerly agnatology) is the study of deliberate, culturally cultivated ignorance or doubt, typically to sell a product, influence opinion, or win favour, particularly through the publication of inaccurate or misleading scientific data (i.e. disinformation). More generally, the term includes the condition where more knowledge of a subject creates greater uncertainty.

Stanford University professor Robert N. Proctor cites the Tobacco industry playbook to manufacture doubt about the adverse health effects of tobacco use as a prime example. David Dunning of Cornell University warns that powerful interests exploit the internet to "propagate ignorance".

Active agents of culturally cultivated ignorance include mass media, corporations, and government agencies, operating through secrecy and suppression of information, document destruction, and selective memory. Passive causes include structural information bubbles, such as those produced by racial or class divisions, characterized by limited and selective access to information. Agnotology also focuses on how and why diverse knowledge does not "come to be", or is ignored or delayed. For example, knowledge about plate tectonics was censored and delayed for at least a decade because some evidence remained classified military information related to undersea warfare.

The availability of large amounts of knowledge may allow people to cherry-pick information (whether factual or not) that reinforces their beliefs, a practice known as confirmation bias, and ignore inconvenient knowledge by consuming repetitive or fact-free entertainment. Evidence conflicts on how television affects viewers.

Origins

::quote

::

| title = | quote = | source = Isaac Asimov, 1980 |align = right |width = 400px |border = 1px |fontsize = 100% |bgcolor = #fafafa |title_bg = #fafafa |title_fnt = #202060 |qalign = left |salign = right The term was coined in 1992 by linguist and social historian Iain Boal, at the request of Stanford University professor Robert N. Proctor. The word is based on the Neoclassical Greek word agnōsis (ἄγνωσις, 'not knowing'; cf. Attic Greek , 'unknown' and -logia (-λογία). The term "agnotology" first appeared in print in a footnote in Stanford University professor Proctor's 1995 book, The Cancer Wars: How Politics Shapes What We Know and Don't Know About Cancer:Historians and philosophers of science have tended to treat ignorance as an ever-expanding vacuum into which knowledge is sucked – or even, as Johannes Kepler once put it, as the mother who must die for science to be born. Ignorance, though, is more complex than this. It has a distinct and changing political geography that is often an excellent indicator of the politics of knowledge. We need a political agnotology to complement our political epistemologies.In a 2001 interview about his lapidary work with agate, Proctor used the term to describe his research "only half jokingly" as "agnotology". He connected the topics by noting the lack of geologic knowledge and study of agate since its first known description by Theophrastus in 300 BC, relative to the extensive research on other rocks and minerals such as diamonds, asbestos, granite, and coal. He said agate was a "victim of scientific disinterest," the same "structured apathy" he called "the social construction of ignorance". He was later quoted as calling it "agnotology, the study of ignorance," in a 2003 The New York Times story on medical historians who testify as expert witnesses.

In 2004, Londa Schiebinger, an historian and the then new director of the Institute for Research on Women and Gender (IRWG), argued that agnotology questions why humans do not know important information and that it could be an "outcome of cultural and political struggle". In 2004, Schiebinger offered a more precise definition in a paper on 18th-century voyages of scientific discovery and gender relations, and contrasted it with epistemology, the theory of knowledge, saying that the latter questions how humans know while the former questions why humans do not know: "Ignorance is often not merely the absence of knowledge but an outcome of cultural and political struggle." Proctor co-organized events with Schiebinger, his wife and fellow professor of science history. In 2008, they published an anthology entitled Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance which "provides a new theoretical perspective to broaden traditional questions about 'how we know' to ask: Why don't we know what we don't know?" They locate agnotology within the field of epistemology.

Examples

Proctor offers some examples where agnotology may explain instances of unnatural ignorance. These include the lack of Nakba education in the United States and the obscurity of Penn State's official ties to the United States Marine Corps. The fossil fuel industry used agnotological techniques in its campaign against the scientific consensus on climate change. It became the focus of the 2010 book Merchants of Doubt by Naomi Oreskes and Erik M. Conway. Oil companies paid teams of scientists to downplay its effects.

Michael Betancourt used agnotology in a critical assessment of political economy in a 2010 article and book. His analysis focused on the housing bubble as well as the 1980 to 2008 period. Betancourt argued that this political economy should be termed "agnotologic capitalism", claiming that the systematic production and maintenance of ignorance enabled a "bubble economy" that allowed the economy to function. In his view, the role of affective labor is to create/maintain agnotologic views that enable the maintenance of the capitalist status quo. This is done by proffering counters to every fact, creating contention and confusion that is difficult to resolve. This confusion reduces dissent by deenergizing its motivating alienation and thus its potential to address weaknesses that may trigger collapse.

Related concepts

Agnoiology

Main article: Agnoiology

From the same Greek roots, agnoiology refers either to "the science or study of ignorance, which determines its quality and conditions" or "the doctrine concerning those things of which we are necessarily ignorant," describing a branch of philosophy studied by James Frederick Ferrier in the 19th century.

Ainigmology

Anthropologist Glenn Stone points out that some examples of agnotology (such as work promoting tobacco use) do not actually create a lack of knowledge so much as they create confusion. As a more accurate term Stone suggested "ainigmology", from the Greek root ainigma (as in 'enigma'), referring to riddles or to language that obscures the true meaning of a story.

Cognitronics

An emerging scientific discipline that connects to agnotology is cognitronics, which aims to explain distortions in perception caused by the information society and globalization and cope with these distortions.

Unknowledge

Irvin C. Schick distinguishes unknowledge from ignorance, using the example of "terra incognita" in early maps in which mapmakers marked unexplored territories with that or similar labels, which provided "potential objects of Western political and economic attention."

References

References

  1. Cama, Timothy. (2015-02-26). "Inhofe hurls snowball on Senate floor".
  2. Barrett, Ted. (February 27, 2015). "Inhofe brings snowball on Senate floor as evidence globe is not warming".
  3. (20 January 2016). "NASA, NOAA Analyses Reveal Record-Shattering Global Warm Temperatures in 2015". NASA.
  4. (26 February 2015). "Republican Senate environment chief uses snowball as prop in climate rant". The Guardian.
  5. Kreye, Andrian. (2007). "We Will Overcome Agnotology (The Cultural Production Of Ignorance)". [[Edge.org.
  6. Palmer, Barbara. (4 October 2005). "Conference to explore the social construction of ignorance". Stanford News Service.
  7. Kreye, Andrian. (17 May 2010). "Polonium in Zigaretten : Müll in der Kippe (Polonium in cigarettes : Garbage in the butt)". [[Sueddeutsche Zeitung]].
  8. Kenyon, Georgina. (6 January 2016). "The man who studies the spread of ignorance". [[BBC Future]].
  9. Knobloch-Westerwick. (2009). "Study: Americans choose media messages that agree with their views". Sage.
  10. (5 November 2006). "A Systematic Review for the Effects of Television Viewing by Infants and Preschoolers". Pediatrics.
  11. (6 April 2020). "George Pyle: It can be hard to know whom to trust. And easy to know whom not to.". The Salt Lake Tribune.
  12. Proctor, Robert N.. (2008). "Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance". Stanford University Press.
  13. (15 December 2016). "Agnotology: understanding our ignorance".
  14. Arenson, Karen W.. (22 August 2006). "What Organizations Don't Want to Know Can Hurt". The New York Times.
  15. "Stanford History Department : Robert N. Proctor". Stanford University.
  16. Brown, Nancy Marie. (September 2001). "The Agateer". Research Penn State.
  17. Cohen, Patricia. (14 June 2003). "History for Hire in Industry Lawsuits". [[The New York Times]].
  18. (13 October 2004). "IRWG director hopes to create 'go to' center for gender studies". Stanford News Service.
  19. Schiebinger, L.. (2004). "Feminist History of Colonial Science". Hypatia.
  20. "Agnatology: The Cultural Production of Ignorance".
  21. "Agnotology: The Cultural Production of Ignorance".
  22. Proctor, Robert N.. (2008). "Agnotology: The making and unmaking of ignorance".
  23. (2010). "Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming". Bloomsbury Press.
  24. (2016). "Law and the Management of Disasters: The Challenge of Resilience". Taylor & Francis.
  25. Betancourt, Michael. (2010). "Immaterial Value and Scarcity in Digital Capitalism". CTheory, Theory Beyond the Codes: tbc002.
  26. Betancourt, Michael. (2015). "The critique of digital capitalism : an analysis of the political economy of digital culture and technology". [[Punctum Books]].
  27. {{cite EB1911
  28. (1913). "Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary". G & C. Merriam Co..
  29. "James Frederick Ferrier".
  30. Stone, Glenn Davis. (2014). "Bioinsecurity and vulnerability". School for Advanced Research Press.
  31. Rueckert, Ulrich. (2020). "NANO-CHIPS 2030". Springer.
  32. "THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE on COGNITONICS: The Science about the Human Being in the Digital World".
  33. Schick, İrvin Cemil. (1999). "The erotic margin : sexuality and spatiality in alteritist discourse". Verso.

::callout[type=info title="Wikipedia Source"] This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page. ::

2000s-neologismscognitive-inertiadoubterrorignoranceinterdisciplinary-subfields-of-sociology